我有以下for循环，当我使用splice()删除一个项目时，我得到'seconds'是未定义的。我可以检查它是否未定义，但我觉得可能有一种更优雅的方式来做到这一点。他们的愿望是简单地删除一个项目，然后继续前进。
for (i = 0, len = Auction.auctions.length; i < len; i++) {
auction = Auction.auctions[i];
Auction.auctions[i]['seconds'] --;
if (auction.seconds < 0) {
Auction.auctions.splice(i, 1);
}
}
当前回答
举两个例子:
一个例子
// Remove from Listing the Items Checked in Checkbox for Delete
let temp_products_images = store.state.c_products.products_images
if (temp_products_images != null) {
for (var l = temp_products_images.length; l--;) {
// 'mark' is the checkbox field
if (temp_products_images[l].mark == true) {
store.state.c_products.products_images.splice(l,1); // THIS WORKS
// this.$delete(store.state.c_products.products_images,l); // THIS ALSO WORKS
}
}
}
两个例子
// Remove from Listing the Items Checked in Checkbox for Delete
let temp_products_images = store.state.c_products.products_images
if (temp_products_images != null) {
let l = temp_products_images.length
while (l--)
{
// 'mark' is the checkbox field
if (temp_products_images[l].mark == true) {
store.state.c_products.products_images.splice(l,1); // THIS WORKS
// this.$delete(store.state.c_products.products_images,l); // THIS ALSO WORKS
}
}
}
其他回答
Auction.auctions = Auction.auctions.filter(function(el) {
return --el["seconds"] > 0;
});
为什么在.splice上浪费CPU周期?该操作必须一次又一次地执行整个循环以删除数组中的一个元素。
为什么不只是在一个循环中使用传统的2个旗帜?
Const元素= [1,5,5,3,5,2,4]; Const remove = 5 I = 0 For(令j = 0;J < elements.length;j + +) { If(元素[j] !==删除){ 元素[i] =元素[j] 我+ + ｝ ｝ 元素。长度= I
尝试在循环时将数组中继到newArray:
var auctions = Auction.auctions;
var auctionIndex;
var auction;
var newAuctions = [];
for (
auctionIndex = 0;
auctionIndex < Auction.auctions.length;
auctionIndex++) {
auction = auctions[auctionIndex];
if (auction.seconds >= 0) {
newAuctions.push(
auction);
}
}
Auction.auctions = newAuctions;
这是这个简单线性时间问题的一个简单线性时间解。
当我运行这个代码片段时，n = 100万，每次调用filterInPlace()需要0.013到0.016秒。一个二次解(例如，公认的答案)将需要它的一百万倍左右。
// Remove from array every item such that !condition(item). function filterInPlace(array, condition) { var iOut = 0; for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) if (condition(array[i])) array[iOut++] = array[i]; array.length = iOut; } // Try it out. A quadratic solution would take a very long time. var n = 1*1000*1000; console.log("constructing array..."); var Auction = {auctions: []}; for (var i = 0; i < n; ++i) { Auction.auctions.push({seconds:1}); Auction.auctions.push({seconds:2}); Auction.auctions.push({seconds:0}); } console.log("array length should be "+(3*n)+": ", Auction.auctions.length) filterInPlace(Auction.auctions, function(auction) {return --auction.seconds >= 0; }) console.log("array length should be "+(2*n)+": ", Auction.auctions.length) filterInPlace(Auction.auctions, function(auction) {return --auction.seconds >= 0; }) console.log("array length should be "+n+": ", Auction.auctions.length) filterInPlace(Auction.auctions, function(auction) {return --auction.seconds >= 0; }) console.log("array length should be 0: ", Auction.auctions.length)
注意，这只是修改原始数组，而不是创建一个新数组;这样做是有好处的，例如，在数组是程序的单一内存瓶颈的情况下;在这种情况下，您不希望创建另一个相同大小的数组，即使是临时的。
删除参数
oldJson=[{firstName:'s1',lastName:'v1'},
{firstName:'s2',lastName:'v2'},
{firstName:'s3',lastName:'v3'}]
newJson = oldJson.map(({...ele}) => {
delete ele.firstName;
return ele;
})
它删除和创建新的数组，因为我们在每个对象上使用展开运算符，所以原始数组对象也不会受到损害
