基于enum的单例

一个老问题的现代视角

这种方法通过利用Java的保证来实现单例，即任何enum值在Java程序中只实例化一次，并且enum为线程安全提供了隐式支持。由于Java枚举值是全局可访问的，因此它们可以作为单例使用。

public enum Singleton {
    SINGLETON; 
    public void method() { }
}

这是如何工作的呢?好吧，代码的第二行可以被认为是这样的:

public final static Singleton SINGLETON = new Singleton(); 

我们得到了早期初始化的单例。

记住，因为这是一个枚举，你总是可以通过Singleton访问实例。单例也是:

Singleton s = Singleton.SINGLETON;

优势

To prevent creating other instances of singleton during deserialization use enum based singleton because serialization of enum is taken care by JVM. Enum serialization and deserialization work differently than for normal java objects. The only thing that gets serialized is the name of the enum value. During the deserialization process, the enum valueOf method is used with the deserialized name to get the desired instance. Enum based singleton allows to protect itself from reflection attacks. The enum type actually extends the java Enum class. The reason that reflection cannot be used to instantiate objects of enum type is that the java specification disallows and that rule is coded in the implementation of the newInstance method of the Constructor class, which is usually used for creating objects via reflection:

if ((clazz.getModifiers() & Modifier.ENUM) != 0)
    throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cannot reflectively create enum objects");

Enum不应该被克隆，因为每个值必须只有一个实例。 所有单例实现中最简洁的代码。

缺点

The enum based singleton does not allow lazy initialization. If you changed your design and wanted to convert your singleton to multiton, enum would not allow this. The multiton pattern is used for the controlled creation of multiple instances, which it manages through the use of a map. Rather than having a single instance per application (e.g. the java.lang.Runtime) the multiton pattern instead ensures a single instance per key. Enum appears only in Java 5 so you can not use it in the prior version.

单例模式有几种实现方式，每一种都有优缺点。

急装单件 双重检查锁定单例 初始化-按需holder习语 基于enum的单例

详细的描述每个都太啰嗦了，所以我只是放了一个链接到一篇好文章-所有你想知道的关于Singleton

Enum继承Object类和抽象类Enum的所有方法。所以你可以使用它的方法来反射、多线程、序列化、可比性等等。如果你只是声明一个静态常量而不是Enum，你就不能。除此之外，Enum的值也可以传递给DAO层。

下面是要演示的示例程序。

public enum State {

    Start("1"),
    Wait("1"),
    Notify("2"),
    NotifyAll("3"),
    Run("4"),
    SystemInatilize("5"),
    VendorInatilize("6"),
    test,
    FrameworkInatilize("7");

    public static State getState(String value) {
        return State.Wait;
    }

    private String value;
    State test;

    private State(String value) {
        this.value = value;
    }

    private State() {
    }

    public String getValue() {
        return value;
    }

    public void setCurrentState(State currentState) {
        test = currentState;
    }

    public boolean isNotify() {
        return this.equals(Notify);
    }
}

public class EnumTest {

    State test;

    public void setCurrentState(State currentState) {
        test = currentState;
    }

    public State getCurrentState() {
        return test;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println(State.test);
        System.out.println(State.FrameworkInatilize);
        EnumTest test=new EnumTest();
        test.setCurrentState(State.Notify);
        test. stateSwitch();
    }

    public void stateSwitch() {
        switch (getCurrentState()) {
        case Notify:
            System.out.println("Notify");
            System.out.println(test.isNotify());
            break;
        default:
            break;
        }
    }
}

Something none of the other answers have covered that make enums particularly powerful are the ability to have template methods. Methods can be part of the base enum and overridden by each type. And, with the behavior attached to the enum, it often eliminates the need for if-else constructs or switch statements as this blog post demonstrates - where enum.method() does what originally would be executed inside the conditional. The same example also shows the use of static imports with enums as well producing much cleaner DSL like code.

其他一些有趣的特性包括枚举提供equals()、toString()和hashCode()的实现，并实现Serializable和Comparable。

我强烈推荐Bruce Eckel的《Thinking in Java》第4版，它用了整整一章来讨论这个主题。特别具有启发性的例子是将石头剪子布(即RoShamBo)游戏作为枚举。

而不是做一堆const int声明

您可以将它们都分组在一个enum中

所以它们都是由它们所属的共同群体组织起来的

为什么要使用编程语言的特性?我们有语言的原因是

程序员以计算机可以使用的形式有效而正确地表达算法。 维护人员理解他人编写的算法并正确地进行更改。

枚举提高了正确性和可读性的可能性，而无需编写大量的样板文件。如果你愿意写样板文件，那么你可以“模拟”枚举:

public class Color {
    private Color() {} // Prevent others from making colors.
    public static final Color RED = new Color();
    public static final Color AMBER = new Color();
    public static final Color GREEN = new Color();
}

现在你可以这样写:

Color trafficLightColor = Color.RED;

上面的样板具有与

public enum Color { RED, AMBER, GREEN };

两者都提供来自编译器的相同级别的检查帮助。样板文件只是更多的输入。但是节省大量的输入使程序员更有效率(见1)，所以这是一个值得的特性。

至少还有一个原因是值得的:

Switch语句

上面的静态最终枚举模拟没有给你的一件事是良好的开关情况。对于枚举类型，Java开关使用其变量的类型来推断枚举情况的范围，因此对于上面的枚举Color，你只需要说:

Color color = ... ;
switch (color) {
    case RED:
        ...
        break;
}

注意它不是颜色。箱子里有红色。如果你不使用enum，使用switch的命名量的唯一方法是:

public Class Color {
    public static final int RED = 0;
    public static final int AMBER = 1;
    public static final int GREEN = 2;
}

但是现在保存颜色的变量必须是int类型。漂亮的编译器检查枚举和静态最终模拟消失了。不快乐。

折衷的方法是在模拟中使用标量值成员:

public class Color {
    public static final int RED_TAG = 1;
    public static final int AMBER_TAG = 2;
    public static final int GREEN_TAG = 3;

    public final int tag;

    private Color(int tag) { this.tag = tag; } 
    public static final Color RED = new Color(RED_TAG);
    public static final Color AMBER = new Color(AMBER_TAG);
    public static final Color GREEN = new Color(GREEN_TAG);
}

Now:

Color color = ... ;
switch (color.tag) {
    case Color.RED_TAG:
        ...
        break;
}

但请注意，更多的是样板文件!

使用枚举作为单例

从上面的样板，你可以看到为什么枚举提供了一种实现单例的方法。而不是写:

public class SingletonClass {
    public static final void INSTANCE = new SingletonClass();
    private SingletonClass() {}

    // all the methods and instance data for the class here
}

然后访问它

SingletonClass.INSTANCE

我们可以说

public enum SingletonClass {
    INSTANCE;

    // all the methods and instance data for the class here
}

which gives us the same thing. We can get away with this because Java enums are implemented as full classes with only a little syntactic sugar sprinkled over the top. This is again less boilerplate, but it's non-obvious unless the idiom is familiar to you. I also dislike the fact that you get the various enum functions even though they don't make much sense for the singleton: ord and values, etc. (There's actually a trickier simulation where Color extends Integer that will work with switch, but it's so tricky that it even more clearly shows why enum is a better idea.)

线程安全

只有在没有锁定的情况下惰性地创建单例时，线程安全才会成为潜在的问题。

public class SingletonClass {
    private static SingletonClass INSTANCE;
    private SingletonClass() {}
    public SingletonClass getInstance() {
        if (INSTANCE == null) INSTANCE = new SingletonClass();
        return INSTANCE;
    }

    // all the methods and instance data for the class here
}

如果许多线程同时调用getInstance，而INSTANCE仍然为空，则可以创建任意数量的实例。这很糟糕。唯一的解决方案是添加同步访问来保护变量INSTANCE。

然而，上面的静态最终代码没有这个问题。它在类加载时急切地创建实例。类加载是同步的。

enum单例实际上是惰性的，因为它直到第一次使用才初始化。Java初始化也是同步的，因此多个线程不能初始化instance的多个实例。你得到了一个惰性初始化的单例，只有很少的代码。唯一的缺点是语法相当模糊。您需要了解习惯用法或彻底理解类加载和初始化是如何工作的，才能了解发生了什么。

知道枚举就像其他具有常量字段和私有构造函数的类一样是有用的。

例如,

public enum Weekday
{
  MONDAY, TUESDAY, WEDNESDAY, THURSDAY, FRIDAY, SATURDAY, SUNDAY
} 

编译器按如下方式编译它;

class Weekday extends Enum
{
  public static final Weekday MONDAY  = new Weekday( "MONDAY",   0 );
  public static final Weekday TUESDAY = new Weekday( "TUESDAY ", 1 );
  public static final Weekday WEDNESDAY= new Weekday( "WEDNESDAY", 2 );
  public static final Weekday THURSDAY= new Weekday( "THURSDAY", 3 );
  public static final Weekday FRIDAY= new Weekday( "FRIDAY", 4 );
  public static final Weekday SATURDAY= new Weekday( "SATURDAY", 5 );
  public static final Weekday SUNDAY= new Weekday( "SUNDAY", 6 );

  private Weekday( String s, int i )
  {
    super( s, i );
  }

  // other methods...
}