这是另一种递归算法。

这段代码只使用了Array。shift和递归，这意味着它可以在Internet Explorer 6+中运行。如果你有任何疑问，你可以访问我的GitHub页面。

(function(root, factory) {
  if (typeof exports === 'object') {
    return module.exports = factory();
  } else if (typeof define === 'function' && define.amd) {
    return define(factory);
  } else {
    return root.compareVer = factory();
  }
})(this, function() {
  'use strict';
  var _compareVer;
  _compareVer = function(newVer, oldVer) {
    var VER_RE, compareNum, isTrue, maxLen, newArr, newLen, newMatch, oldArr, oldLen, oldMatch, zerofill;
    VER_RE = /(\d+\.){1,9}\d+/;
    if (arguments.length !== 2) {
      return -100;
    }
    if (typeof newVer !== 'string') {
      return -2;
    }
    if (typeof oldVer !== 'string') {
      return -3;
    }
    newMatch = newVer.match(VER_RE);
    if (!newMatch || newMatch[0] !== newVer) {
      return -4;
    }
    oldMatch = oldVer.match(VER_RE);
    if (!oldMatch || oldMatch[0] !== oldVer) {
      return -5;
    }
    newVer = newVer.replace(/^0/, '');
    oldVer = oldVer.replace(/^0/, '');
    if (newVer === oldVer) {
      return 0;
    } else {
      newArr = newVer.split('.');
      oldArr = oldVer.split('.');
      newLen = newArr.length;
      oldLen = oldArr.length;
      maxLen = Math.max(newLen, oldLen);
      zerofill = function() {
        newArr.length < maxLen && newArr.push('0');
        oldArr.length < maxLen && oldArr.push('0');
        return newArr.length !== oldArr.length && zerofill();
      };
      newLen !== oldLen && zerofill();
      if (newArr.toString() === oldArr.toString()) {
        if (newLen > oldLen) {
          return 1;
        } else {
          return -1;
        }
      } else {
        isTrue = -1;
        compareNum = function() {
          var _new, _old;
          _new = ~~newArr.shift();
          _old = ~~oldArr.shift();
          _new > _old && (isTrue = 1);
          return _new === _old && newArr.length > 0 && compareNum();
        };
        compareNum();
        return isTrue;
      }
    }
  };
  return _compareVer;
});

好吧，我希望这段代码能帮助到一些人。

下面是测试。

console.log(compareVer("0.0.2","0.0.1"));//1
console.log(compareVer("0.0.10","0.0.1")); //1
console.log(compareVer("0.0.10","0.0.2")); //1
console.log(compareVer("0.9.0","0.9")); //1
console.log(compareVer("0.10.0","0.9.0")); //1
console.log(compareVer("1.7", "1.07")); //1
console.log(compareVer("1.0.07", "1.0.007")); //1

console.log(compareVer("0.3","0.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("0.0.3","0.0.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("0.0.3.0","0.0.3.0")); //0
console.log(compareVer("00.3","0.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("00.3","00.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("01.0.3","1.0.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("1.0.3","01.0.3")); //0

console.log(compareVer("0.2.0","1.0.0")); //-1
console.log(compareVer('0.0.2.2.0',"0.0.2.3")); //-1
console.log(compareVer('0.0.2.0',"0.0.2")); //-1
console.log(compareVer('0.0.2',"0.0.2.0")); //-1
console.log(compareVer("1.07", "1.7")); //-1
console.log(compareVer("1.0.007", "1.0.07")); //-1

console.log(compareVer()); //-100
console.log(compareVer("0.0.2")); //-100
console.log(compareVer("0.0.2","0.0.2","0.0.2")); //-100
console.log(compareVer(1212,"0.0.2")); //-2
console.log(compareVer("0.0.2",1212)); //-3
console.log(compareVer('1.abc.2',"1.0.2")); //-4
console.log(compareVer('1.0.2',"1.abc.2")); //-5

下面是一个版本，它对版本字符串进行排序，而不分配任何子字符串或数组。由于它分配的对象更少，GC要做的工作也就更少。

有一对分配(允许重用getVersionPart方法)，但是如果您对性能非常敏感，您可以扩展它以完全避免分配。

const compareVersionStrings : (a: string, b: string) => number = (a, b) =>
{
    var ia = {s:a,i:0}, ib = {s:b,i:0};
    while (true)
    {
        var na = getVersionPart(ia), nb = getVersionPart(ib);

        if (na === null && nb === null)
            return 0;
        if (na === null)
            return -1;
        if (nb === null)
            return 1;
        if (na > nb)
            return 1;
        if (na < nb)
            return -1;
    }
};

const zeroCharCode = '0'.charCodeAt(0);

const getVersionPart = (a : {s:string, i:number}) =>
{
    if (a.i >= a.s.length)
        return null;

    var n = 0;
    while (a.i < a.s.length)
    {
        if (a.s[a.i] === '.')
        {
            a.i++;
            break;
        }

        n *= 10;
        n += a.s.charCodeAt(a.i) - zeroCharCode;
        a.i++;
    }
    return n;
}

function compare(versionA: string | undefined, versionB: string | undefined, operator: string = '>') {
    if (versionA === undefined || versionB === undefined) {
        return false
    }
    const listA = versionA.split('.')
    const listB = versionB.split('.')
    let a = []
    let b = []
    for (let i = 0; i < listA.length; i++) {
        a.push(parseInt(listA[i].replace(/\D/g, ''), 10))
        b.push(parseInt(listB[i].replace(/\D/g, ''), 10))
    }

    for (let i = 0; i < listA.length; i++) {
        switch (operator) {
            case '>':
            case '>=':
                if (a[i] === b[i]) {
                    continue
                }
                if (a[i] > b[i]) {
                    return true
                }
                if (a[i] < b[i]) {
                    return false
                }
                break
            case '<':
            case '<=':
                if (a[i] === b[i]) {
                    continue
                }
                if (a[i] > b[i]) {
                    return false
                }
                if (a[i] < b[i]) {
                    return true
                }
                break
            case '=':
               if (a[i] > b[i]) {
                   return false
               }
               if (a[i] < b[i]) {
                   return false
               }
               break
        }
    }
    switch (operator) {
        case '>':
            return false
        case '<':
            return false
        case '=':
        case '>=':
        case '<=':
            return true
    }
}

你可以遍历每个以句点分隔的字符并将其转换为int类型:

var parts = versionString.split('.');

for (var i = 0; i < parts.length; i++) {
  var value = parseInt(parts[i]);
  // do stuffs here.. perhaps build a numeric version variable?
}

我喜欢@mar10的版本，尽管从我的角度来看，有误用的可能(如果版本与Semantic Versioning文档兼容，似乎不是这样，但如果使用了一些“构建号”，则可能是这样):

versionCompare( '1.09', '1.1');  // returns 1, which is wrong:  1.09 < 1.1
versionCompare('1.702', '1.8');  // returns 1, which is wrong: 1.702 < 1.8

这里的问题是，在某些情况下，版本号的子数字被删除了后面的零(至少我最近在使用不同的软件时看到的)，这类似于数字的有理数部分，因此:

5.17.2054 > 5.17.2
5.17.2 == 5.17.20 == 5.17.200 == ... 
5.17.2054 > 5.17.20
5.17.2054 > 5.17.200
5.17.2054 > 5.17.2000
5.17.2054 > 5.17.20000
5.17.2054 < 5.17.20001
5.17.2054 < 5.17.3
5.17.2054 < 5.17.30

但是，第一个(或第一个和第二个)版本子号始终被视为它实际等于的整数值。

如果你使用这种版本控制，你可以只改变例子中的几行:

// replace this:
p1 = parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);
p2 = parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);
// with this:
p1 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v1parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);
p2 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v2parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);

因此，除了第一个子数字外，每个子数字都将作为浮点数进行比较，因此09和1将相应地变成0.09和0.1，并以这种方式进行正确比较。2054和3将变成0.2054和0.3。

那么，完整的版本是(归功于@mar10):

/** Compare two dotted version strings (like '10.2.3').
 * @returns {Integer} 0: v1 == v2, -1: v1 < v2, 1: v1 > v2
 */
function versionCompare(v1, v2) {
    var v1parts = ("" + v1).split("."),
        v2parts = ("" + v2).split("."),
        minLength = Math.min(v1parts.length, v2parts.length),
        p1, p2, i;
    // Compare tuple pair-by-pair. 
    for(i = 0; i < minLength; i++) {
        // Convert to integer if possible, because "8" > "10".
        p1 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v1parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);;
        p2 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v2parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);
        if (isNaN(p1)){ p1 = v1parts[i]; } 
        if (isNaN(p2)){ p2 = v2parts[i]; } 
        if (p1 == p2) {
            continue;
        }else if (p1 > p2) {
            return 1;
        }else if (p1 < p2) {
            return -1;
        }
        // one operand is NaN
        return NaN;
    }
    // The longer tuple is always considered 'greater'
    if (v1parts.length === v2parts.length) {
        return 0;
    }
    return (v1parts.length < v2parts.length) ? -1 : 1;
}

注:这是比较慢的，但也可以考虑重用相同的比较函数来操作字符串实际上是字符数组的事实:

 function cmp_ver(arr1, arr2) {
     // fill the tail of the array with smaller length with zeroes, to make both array have the same length
     while (min_arr.length < max_arr.length) {
         min_arr[min_arr.lentgh] = '0';
     }
     // compare every element in arr1 with corresponding element from arr2, 
     // but pass them into the same function, so string '2054' will act as
     // ['2','0','5','4'] and string '19', in this case, will become ['1', '9', '0', '0']
     for (i: 0 -> max_length) {
         var res = cmp_ver(arr1[i], arr2[i]);
         if (res !== 0) return res;
     }
 }

现在我们可以使用Intl了。Collator API现在创建数值比较器。浏览器支持是相当不错的，但在撰写本文时，Node.js还不支持。

const semverCompare = new Intl。Collator("en"， {numeric: true}).compare; const版本=[1.0.1,“1.10.2”,“1.1.1”,‘1.10.1’,‘1.5.10’,‘2.10.0’,‘2.0.1’); console.log (versions.sort (semverCompare)) const example2 =(“1.0”,“1.0.1”,“2.0”,“2.0.0.1”,“2.0.1”); console.log (example2.sort (semverCompare))