302 FOUND和307 TEMPORARY REDIRECT HTTP响应之间的区别是什么?
W3规范似乎表明它们都用于临时重定向,并且都不能缓存,除非响应特别允许。
302 FOUND和307 TEMPORARY REDIRECT HTTP响应之间的区别是什么?
W3规范似乎表明它们都用于临时重定向,并且都不能缓存,除非响应特别允许。
当前回答
301: permanent redirect: the URL is old and should be replaced. Browsers will cache this. Example usage: URL moved from /register-form.html to signup-form.html. The method will change to GET, as per RFC 7231: "For historical reasons, a user agent MAY change the request method from POST to GET for the subsequent request." 302: temporary redirect. Only use for HTTP/1.0 clients. This status code should not change the method, but browsers did it anyway. The RFC says: "Many pre-HTTP/1.1 user agents do not understand [303]. When interoperability with such clients is a concern, the 302 status code may be used instead, since most user agents react to a 302 response as described here for 303." Of course, some clients may implement it according to the spec, so if interoperability with such ancient clients is not a real concern, 303 is better for consistent results. 303: temporary redirect, changing the method to GET. Example usage: if the browser sent POST to /register.php, then now load (GET) /success.html. 307: temporary redirect, repeating the request identically. Example usage: if the browser sent a POST to /register.php, then this tells it to redo the POST at /signup.php. 308: permanent redirect, repeating the request identically. Where 307 is the "no method change" counterpart of 303, this 308 status is the "no method change" counterpart of 301.
RFC 7231(从2014年开始)可读性很强,不会过于冗长。如果你想知道确切的答案,这本书是推荐阅读的。其他一些答案使用了1999年的RFC 2616,但没有任何变化。
RFC 7238指定308状态。它被认为是实验性的,但在2016年已经被所有主要浏览器支持。
其他回答
301: permanent redirect: the URL is old and should be replaced. Browsers will cache this. Example usage: URL moved from /register-form.html to signup-form.html. The method will change to GET, as per RFC 7231: "For historical reasons, a user agent MAY change the request method from POST to GET for the subsequent request." 302: temporary redirect. Only use for HTTP/1.0 clients. This status code should not change the method, but browsers did it anyway. The RFC says: "Many pre-HTTP/1.1 user agents do not understand [303]. When interoperability with such clients is a concern, the 302 status code may be used instead, since most user agents react to a 302 response as described here for 303." Of course, some clients may implement it according to the spec, so if interoperability with such ancient clients is not a real concern, 303 is better for consistent results. 303: temporary redirect, changing the method to GET. Example usage: if the browser sent POST to /register.php, then now load (GET) /success.html. 307: temporary redirect, repeating the request identically. Example usage: if the browser sent a POST to /register.php, then this tells it to redo the POST at /signup.php. 308: permanent redirect, repeating the request identically. Where 307 is the "no method change" counterpart of 303, this 308 status is the "no method change" counterpart of 301.
RFC 7231(从2014年开始)可读性很强,不会过于冗长。如果你想知道确切的答案,这本书是推荐阅读的。其他一些答案使用了1999年的RFC 2616,但没有任何变化。
RFC 7238指定308状态。它被认为是实验性的,但在2016年已经被所有主要浏览器支持。
区别在于重定向POST, PUT和DELETE请求,以及服务器对用户代理行为的期望(RFC 2616):
注意:RFC 1945和RFC 2068指定不允许客户端这样做 更改重定向上的方法 请求。然而,大多数现有用户 代理实现将302视为 这是303响应,执行一个 GET Location字段值 不管最初的请求是什么 方法。状态代码是303和307 已添加的服务器,希望 明确地说明是哪一种 的反应是预期的 客户端。
另外,请阅读维基百科关于30x重定向代码的文章。
302 is temporary redirect, which is generated by the server whereas 307 is internal redirect response generated by the browser. Internal redirect means that redirect is done automatically by browser internally, basically the browser alters the entered url from http to https in get request by itself before making the request so request for unsecured connection is never made to the internet. Whether browser will alter the url to https or not depends upon the hsts preload list that comes preinstalled with the browser. You can also add any site which support https to the list by entering the domain in the hsts preload list of your own browser which is at chrome://net-internals/#hsts.One more thing website domains can be added by their owners to preload list by filling up the form at https://hstspreload.org/ so that it comes preinstalled in browsers for every user even though I mention you can do particularly for yourself also.
Let me explain with an example: I made a get request to http://www.pentesteracademy.com which supports only https and I don't have that domain in my hsts preload list on my browser as site owner has not registered for it to come with preinstalled hsts preload list. GET request for unsecure version of the site is redirected to secure version(see http header named location for that in response in above image). Now I add the site to my own browser preload list by adding its domain in Add hsts domain form at chrome://net-internals/#hsts, which modifies my personal preload list on my chrome browser.Be sure to select include subdomains for STS option there. Let's see the request and response for the same website now after adding it to hsts preload list. you can see the internal redirect 307 there in response headers, actually this response is generated by your browser not by server. Also HSTS preload list can help prevent users reach the unsecure version of site as 302 redirect are prone to mitm attacks. Hope I somewhat helped you understand more about redirects.
307和302之间的唯一区别是307保证在重定向请求发出时方法和主体不会被更改。对于302,一些旧客户端错误地将方法更改为GET:使用非GET方法和302的行为在Web上是不可预测的,而使用307的行为是可预测的。对于GET请求,它们的行为是相同的。
参考文献:307临时重定向
307内部重定向的一个很好的例子是当谷歌Chrome遇到一个HTTP调用到一个域,它知道需要严格的传输安全。
浏览器使用与原始调用相同的方法无缝重定向。