在windows通用应用程序

你可以将此代码与属性“Password”一起使用，并与modelView绑定

<密码框 x：uid=“密码框” 密码=“{绑定服务员.密码，模式=双向}” 名称=“txt密码” 水平对齐=“拉伸” 边距=“50，200，50，0” 垂直对齐=“顶部”/>

使用附加行为和ICommand发送一个SecureString到视图模型

在实现MVVM时，代码隐藏并没有错。MVVM是一种架构模式，旨在将视图与模型/业务逻辑分离。MVVM描述了如何以可重复的方式(模式)实现这一目标。它不关心实现细节，比如如何构造或实现视图。它只是画出边界，并根据这个模式的术语定义什么是视图，视图模型和什么是模型。

MVVM不关心语言(XAML或c#)或编译器(部分类)。独立于语言是设计模式的强制性特征——它必须与语言无关。

However, code-behind has some draw backs like making your UI logic harder to understand, when it is wildly distributed between XAML and C#. But most important implementing UI logic or objects like templates, styles, triggers, animations etc in C# is very complex and ugly/less readable than using XAML. XAML is a markup language that uses tags and nesting to visualize object hierarchy. Creating UI using XAML is very convenient. Although there are situations where you are fine choosing to implement UI logic in C# (or code-behind). Handling the PasswordBox is one example.

因此，在代码背后通过处理PasswordBox来处理PasswordBox。PasswordChanged没有违反MVVM模式。

一个明显的违规是将控件(PasswordBox)传递给视图模型。许多解决方案都推荐这样做，例如，将PasswordBox的实例作为ICommand传递。CommandParameter添加到视图模型。这显然是一个非常糟糕和不必要的建议。

如果你不关心使用c#，只是想保持你的代码文件干净，或者只是想封装一个行为/UI逻辑，你总是可以使用附加属性并实现附加行为。

与臭名昭著的支持绑定纯文本密码的广泛传播帮助器(非常糟糕的反模式和安全风险)相反，此行为使用ICommand将密码作为SecureString发送到视图模型，每当PasswordBox抛出PasswordBox时。PasswordChanged事件。

MainWindow.xaml

<Window>
  <Window.DataContext>
    <ViewModel />
  </Window.DataContext>

  <PasswordBox PasswordBox.Command="{Binding VerifyPasswordCommand}" />
</Window>

ViewModel.cs

public class ViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
  public ICommand VerifyPasswordCommand => new RelayCommand(VerifyPassword);

  public void VerifyPassword(object commadParameter)
  {
    if (commandParameter is SecureString secureString)
    {
      IntPtr valuePtr = IntPtr.Zero;
      try
      {
        valuePtr = Marshal.SecureStringToGlobalAllocUnicode(value);
        string plainTextPassword = Marshal.PtrToStringUni(valuePtr);

        // Handle plain text password. 
        // It's recommended to convert the SecureString to plain text in the model, when really needed.
      } 
      finally 
      {
        Marshal.ZeroFreeGlobalAllocUnicode(valuePtr);
      }
    }
  }
}

PasswordBox.cs

// Attached behavior
class PasswordBox : DependencyObject
{
  #region Command attached property

  public static readonly DependencyProperty CommandProperty =
    DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
      "Command",
      typeof(ICommand),
      typeof(PasswordBox),
      new PropertyMetadata(default(ICommand), PasswordBox.OnSendPasswordCommandChanged));

  public static void SetCommand(DependencyObject attachingElement, ICommand value) =>
    attachingElement.SetValue(PasswordBox.CommandProperty, value);

  public static ICommand GetCommand(DependencyObject attachingElement) =>
    (ICommand) attachingElement.GetValue(PasswordBox.CommandProperty);

  #endregion

  private static void OnSendPasswordCommandChanged(
    DependencyObject attachingElement,
    DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
  {
    if (!(attachingElement is System.Windows.Controls.PasswordBox passwordBox))
    {
      throw new ArgumentException("Attaching element must be of type 'PasswordBox'");
    }

    if (e.OldValue != null)
    {
      return;
    }

    WeakEventManager<object, RoutedEventArgs>.AddHandler(
      passwordBox,
      nameof(System.Windows.Controls.PasswordBox.PasswordChanged),
      SendPassword_OnPasswordChanged);
  }

  private static void SendPassword_OnPasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
  {
    var attachedElement = sender as System.Windows.Controls.PasswordBox;
    SecureString commandParameter = attachedElement?.SecurePassword;
    if (commandParameter == null || commandParameter.Length < 1)
    {
      return;
    }

    ICommand sendCommand = GetCommand(attachedElement);
    sendCommand?.Execute(commandParameter);
  }
}

我想我应该把我的解决方案放在一起，因为这是一个很常见的问题……拥有大量的选择总是一件好事。

I simply wrapped a PasswordBox in a UserControl and implemented a DependencyProperty to be able to bind. I'm doing everything I can to avoid storing any clear text in the memory, so everything is done through a SecureString and the PasswordBox.Password property. During the foreach loop, each character does get exposed, but it's very brief. Honestly, if you're worried about your WPF application to be compromised from this brief exposure, you've got bigger security issues that should be handled.

这样做的好处是你没有违反任何MVVM规则，即使是“最纯粹的”规则，因为这是一个UserControl，所以它允许有代码隐藏。当你使用它时，你可以在View和ViewModel之间进行纯通信，而你的VideModel不知道View的任何部分或密码的来源。只要确保你在ViewModel中绑定到SecureString。

BindablePasswordBox.xaml

<UserControl x:Class="BK.WPF.CustomControls.BindanblePasswordBox"
             xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
             xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" 
             xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008" 
             mc:Ignorable="d" d:DesignHeight="22" d:DesignWidth="150">
    <PasswordBox x:Name="PswdBox"/>
</UserControl>

BindablePasswordBox.xaml.cs(版本1 -不支持双向绑定)

using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Security;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;

namespace BK.WPF.CustomControls
{
    public partial class BindanblePasswordBox : UserControl
    {
        public static readonly DependencyProperty PasswordProperty =
            DependencyProperty.Register("Password", typeof(SecureString), typeof(BindanblePasswordBox));

        public SecureString Password
        {
            get { return (SecureString)GetValue(PasswordProperty); }
            set { SetValue(PasswordProperty, value); }
        }

        public BindanblePasswordBox()
        {
            InitializeComponent();
            PswdBox.PasswordChanged += PswdBox_PasswordChanged;
        }

        private void PswdBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
        {
            var secure = new SecureString();
            foreach (var c in PswdBox.Password)
            {
                secure.AppendChar(c);
            }
            Password = secure;
        }
    }
}

版本1的用法:

<local:BindanblePasswordBox Width="150" HorizontalAlignment="Center"
                            VerticalAlignment="Center"
                            Password="{Binding Password, Mode=OneWayToSource}"/>

BindablePasswordBox.xaml.cs(版本2 -支持双向绑定)

public partial class BindablePasswordBox : UserControl
{
    public static readonly DependencyProperty PasswordProperty =
        DependencyProperty.Register("Password", typeof(SecureString), typeof(BindablePasswordBox),
        new PropertyMetadata(PasswordChanged));

    public SecureString Password
    {
        get { return (SecureString)GetValue(PasswordProperty); }
        set { SetValue(PasswordProperty, value); }
    }

    public BindablePasswordBox()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
        PswdBox.PasswordChanged += PswdBox_PasswordChanged;
    }

    private void PswdBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        var secure = new SecureString();
        foreach (var c in PswdBox.Password)
        {
            secure.AppendChar(c);
        }
        if (Password != secure)
        {
            Password = secure;
        }
    }

    private static void PasswordChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
    {
        var pswdBox = d as BindablePasswordBox;
        if (pswdBox != null && e.NewValue != e.OldValue)
        {
            var newValue = e.NewValue as SecureString;
            if (newValue == null)
            {
                return;
            }

            var unmanagedString = IntPtr.Zero;
            string newString;
            try
            {
                unmanagedString = Marshal.SecureStringToGlobalAllocUnicode(newValue);
                newString = Marshal.PtrToStringUni(unmanagedString);
            }
            finally
            {
                Marshal.ZeroFreeGlobalAllocUnicode(unmanagedString);
            }

            var currentValue = pswdBox.PswdBox.Password;
            if (currentValue != newString)
            {
                pswdBox.PswdBox.Password = newString;
            }
        }
    }
}

版本2的用途:

<local:BindanblePasswordBox Width="150" HorizontalAlignment="Center"
                            VerticalAlignment="Center"
                            Password="{Binding Password, Mode=TwoWay}"/>

正如你所看到的，我绑定到密码，但也许它绑定到静态类..

它是一个附加属性。这种属性可以应用于任何类型的DependencyObject，而不仅仅是声明它的类型。因此，尽管它是在PasswordHelper静态类中声明的，但它还是应用于使用它的PasswordBox。

要使用这个附加属性，你只需要将它绑定到ViewModel中的Password属性:

<PasswordBox w:PasswordHelper.Attach="True" 
         w:PasswordHelper.Password="{Binding Password}"/>

这个实现略有不同。通过绑定ViewModel中的属性将PasswordBox传递给View。它不使用任何命令参数。ViewModel对视图保持无知。 我有一个VB VS 2010项目，可以从SkyDrive下载。WPF MVVM PassWordBox Example.zip

我在WPF MVVM应用程序中使用PasswordBox的方式非常简单，对我来说工作得很好。

基本上你创建了一个公共只读属性，视图可以绑定到PasswordBox(实际控件):

Private _thePassWordBox As PasswordBox
Public ReadOnly Property ThePassWordBox As PasswordBox
    Get
        If IsNothing(_thePassWordBox) Then _thePassWordBox = New PasswordBox
        Return _thePassWordBox
    End Get
End Property

我使用了一个支持字段来完成属性的自我初始化。

然后从Xaml中绑定ContentControl或Control Container的内容:

 <ContentControl Grid.Column="1" Grid.Row="1" Height="23" Width="120" Content="{Binding Path=ThePassWordBox}" HorizontalAlignment="Center" VerticalAlignment="Center" />

从那里你可以完全控制密码盒。我还使用PasswordAccessor(只是一个字符串的函数)返回密码值时，做登录或任何其他你想要的密码。在这个例子中，我在通用用户对象模型中有一个公共属性。 例子:

Public Property PasswordAccessor() As Func(Of String)

在用户对象中，密码字符串属性是只读的，没有任何备份存储。它只是从PasswordBox返回Password。 例子:

Public ReadOnly Property PassWord As String
    Get
        Return If((PasswordAccessor Is Nothing), String.Empty, PasswordAccessor.Invoke())
    End Get
End Property

然后在ViewModel中，我确保Accessor被创建并设置为PasswordBox。密码属性:

Public Sub New()
    'Sets the Accessor for the Password Property
    SetPasswordAccessor(Function() ThePassWordBox.Password)
End Sub

Friend Sub SetPasswordAccessor(ByVal accessor As Func(Of String))
    If Not IsNothing(VMUser) Then VMUser.PasswordAccessor = accessor
End Sub

当我需要密码字符串说登录，我只是得到用户对象密码属性，真正调用函数抓取密码并返回它，然后实际的密码不存储在用户对象。 例如:将在ViewModel中

Private Function LogIn() as Boolean
    'Make call to your Authentication methods and or functions. I usally place that code in the Model
    Return AuthenticationManager.Login(New UserIdentity(User.UserName, User.Password)
End Function

That should do it. The ViewModel doesn't need any knowledge of the View's Controls. The View just binds to the Property in the ViewModel, not any different than the View Binding to an image or other resource. In this case that resource(Property) just happens to be a usercontrol. It allows for testing as the ViewModel creates and owns the Property and the Property is independent of the View. As for security I don't know how good this implementation is. But by using a Function the value is not stored in the Property itself just accessed by the Property.

不幸的是，我没有足够的代表来评论另一个答案:( 只是想继续“史蒂夫在指挥官”的回答。 更新他的“PasswordChanged”事件如下，如果你在一个视图上有多个PasswordBox，通过使用sender的Name属性，可以为所有的PasswordBox使用相同的PasswordChanged事件。可能有更好的方法来做到这一点，如果有任何理由不这样做，请告诉我:)

private void PasswordBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        if (sender is PasswordBox) { 
        if (this.DataContext != null)

        { ((dynamic)this.DataContext).GetType().GetProperty(((PasswordBox)sender).Name).SetValue((dynamic)this.DataContext, ((PasswordBox)sender).Password, null); }
    }
    }