这对我来说很好。

<Button Command="{Binding Connect}" 
        CommandParameter="{Binding ElementName=MyPasswordBox}"/>

我做过这样的事情:

XAML:

<PasswordBox x:Name="NewPassword" PasswordChanged="NewPassword_PasswordChanged"/>
<!--change tablenameViewSource: yours!-->
<Grid DataContext="{StaticResource tablenameViewSource}" Visibility="Hidden">
        <TextBox x:Name="Password" Text="{Binding password, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</Grid>

C#:

private void NewPassword_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        try
        {
           //change tablenameDataTable: yours! and tablenameViewSource: yours!
           tablenameDataTable.Rows[tablenameViewSource.View.CurrentPosition]["password"] = NewPassword.Password;
        }
        catch
        {
            this.Password.Text = this.NewPassword.Password;
        }
    }

这对我很管用!

我在这里发布了一个GIST，它是一个可绑定的密码框。

using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;

namespace CustomControl
{
    public class BindablePasswordBox : Decorator
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// The password dependency property.
        /// </summary>
        public static readonly DependencyProperty PasswordProperty;

        private bool isPreventCallback;
        private RoutedEventHandler savedCallback;

        /// <summary>
        /// Static constructor to initialize the dependency properties.
        /// </summary>
        static BindablePasswordBox()
        {
            PasswordProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
                "Password",
                typeof(string),
                typeof(BindablePasswordBox),
                new FrameworkPropertyMetadata("", FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.BindsTwoWayByDefault, new PropertyChangedCallback(OnPasswordPropertyChanged))
            );
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Saves the password changed callback and sets the child element to the password box.
        /// </summary>
        public BindablePasswordBox()
        {
            savedCallback = HandlePasswordChanged;

            PasswordBox passwordBox = new PasswordBox();
            passwordBox.PasswordChanged += savedCallback;
            Child = passwordBox;
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// The password dependency property.
        /// </summary>
        public string Password
        {
            get { return GetValue(PasswordProperty) as string; }
            set { SetValue(PasswordProperty, value); }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Handles changes to the password dependency property.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="d">the dependency object</param>
        /// <param name="eventArgs">the event args</param>
        private static void OnPasswordPropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs eventArgs)
        {
            BindablePasswordBox bindablePasswordBox = (BindablePasswordBox) d;
            PasswordBox passwordBox = (PasswordBox) bindablePasswordBox.Child;

            if (bindablePasswordBox.isPreventCallback)
            {
                return;
            }

            passwordBox.PasswordChanged -= bindablePasswordBox.savedCallback;
            passwordBox.Password = (eventArgs.NewValue != null) ? eventArgs.NewValue.ToString() : "";
            passwordBox.PasswordChanged += bindablePasswordBox.savedCallback;
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Handles the password changed event.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="sender">the sender</param>
        /// <param name="eventArgs">the event args</param>
        private void HandlePasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs eventArgs)
        {
            PasswordBox passwordBox = (PasswordBox) sender;

            isPreventCallback = true;
            Password = passwordBox.Password;
            isPreventCallback = false;
        }
    }
}

这个实现略有不同。通过绑定ViewModel中的属性将PasswordBox传递给View。它不使用任何命令参数。ViewModel对视图保持无知。 我有一个VB VS 2010项目，可以从SkyDrive下载。WPF MVVM PassWordBox Example.zip

我在WPF MVVM应用程序中使用PasswordBox的方式非常简单，对我来说工作得很好。

基本上你创建了一个公共只读属性，视图可以绑定到PasswordBox(实际控件):

Private _thePassWordBox As PasswordBox
Public ReadOnly Property ThePassWordBox As PasswordBox
    Get
        If IsNothing(_thePassWordBox) Then _thePassWordBox = New PasswordBox
        Return _thePassWordBox
    End Get
End Property

我使用了一个支持字段来完成属性的自我初始化。

然后从Xaml中绑定ContentControl或Control Container的内容:

 <ContentControl Grid.Column="1" Grid.Row="1" Height="23" Width="120" Content="{Binding Path=ThePassWordBox}" HorizontalAlignment="Center" VerticalAlignment="Center" />

从那里你可以完全控制密码盒。我还使用PasswordAccessor(只是一个字符串的函数)返回密码值时，做登录或任何其他你想要的密码。在这个例子中，我在通用用户对象模型中有一个公共属性。 例子:

Public Property PasswordAccessor() As Func(Of String)

在用户对象中，密码字符串属性是只读的，没有任何备份存储。它只是从PasswordBox返回Password。 例子:

Public ReadOnly Property PassWord As String
    Get
        Return If((PasswordAccessor Is Nothing), String.Empty, PasswordAccessor.Invoke())
    End Get
End Property

然后在ViewModel中，我确保Accessor被创建并设置为PasswordBox。密码属性:

Public Sub New()
    'Sets the Accessor for the Password Property
    SetPasswordAccessor(Function() ThePassWordBox.Password)
End Sub

Friend Sub SetPasswordAccessor(ByVal accessor As Func(Of String))
    If Not IsNothing(VMUser) Then VMUser.PasswordAccessor = accessor
End Sub

当我需要密码字符串说登录，我只是得到用户对象密码属性，真正调用函数抓取密码并返回它，然后实际的密码不存储在用户对象。 例如:将在ViewModel中

Private Function LogIn() as Boolean
    'Make call to your Authentication methods and or functions. I usally place that code in the Model
    Return AuthenticationManager.Login(New UserIdentity(User.UserName, User.Password)
End Function

That should do it. The ViewModel doesn't need any knowledge of the View's Controls. The View just binds to the Property in the ViewModel, not any different than the View Binding to an image or other resource. In this case that resource(Property) just happens to be a usercontrol. It allows for testing as the ViewModel creates and owns the Property and the Property is independent of the View. As for security I don't know how good this implementation is. But by using a Function the value is not stored in the Property itself just accessed by the Property.

不幸的是，我没有足够的代表来评论另一个答案:( 只是想继续“史蒂夫在指挥官”的回答。 更新他的“PasswordChanged”事件如下，如果你在一个视图上有多个PasswordBox，通过使用sender的Name属性，可以为所有的PasswordBox使用相同的PasswordChanged事件。可能有更好的方法来做到这一点，如果有任何理由不这样做，请告诉我:)

private void PasswordBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        if (sender is PasswordBox) { 
        if (this.DataContext != null)

        { ((dynamic)this.DataContext).GetType().GetProperty(((PasswordBox)sender).Name).SetValue((dynamic)this.DataContext, ((PasswordBox)sender).Password, null); }
    }
    }

也许我遗漏了一些东西，但似乎大多数解决方案都把事情复杂化了，并且忽略了安全实践。

此方法不违反MVVM模式，并保持完全的安全性。是的，从技术上讲，它是后面的代码，但它只不过是一个“特殊情况”绑定。ViewModel仍然没有视图实现的知识，在我看来，如果你试图将PasswordBox传递到ViewModel，它就会知道。

Code Behind !=自动违反MVVM。这完全取决于你怎么处理它。在这种情况下，我们只是手动编码绑定，所以它都被认为是UI实现的一部分，因此是ok的。

在ViewModel中，只是一个简单的属性。我把它设置为“只写”，因为无论出于什么原因，都不需要从ViewModel外部检索它，但它并不一定要这样。注意，它是一个SecureString，而不仅仅是一个字符串。

public SecureString SecurePassword { private get; set; }

在xaml中，您设置了PasswordChanged事件处理程序。

<PasswordBox PasswordChanged="PasswordBox_PasswordChanged"/>

在后面的代码中:

private void PasswordBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
    if (this.DataContext != null)
    { ((dynamic)this.DataContext).SecurePassword = ((PasswordBox)sender).SecurePassword; }
}

使用这种方法，您的密码始终保持在SecureString中，因此提供了最大的安全性。如果你真的不关心安全性，或者你需要为需要它的下游方法提供明文密码(注意:大多数需要密码的。net方法也支持SecureString选项，所以你可能真的不需要明文密码，即使你认为你需要)，你可以只使用password属性。是这样的:

(ViewModel财产)

public string Password { private get; set; }

(代码后面)

private void PasswordBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
    if (this.DataContext != null)
    { ((dynamic)this.DataContext).Password = ((PasswordBox)sender).Password; }
}

如果你想保持事物的强类型，你可以用ViewModel的接口代替(动态的)强制转换。但实际上，“正常的”数据绑定也不是强类型的，所以这不是什么大问题。

private void PasswordBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
    if (this.DataContext != null)
    { ((IMyViewModel)this.DataContext).Password = ((PasswordBox)sender).Password; }
}

所以最好的是-你的密码是安全的，你的ViewModel就像任何其他属性一样有一个属性，你的View是自包含的，不需要外部引用。