Java中唯一的chucknorrisexception应该是OutOfMemoryError和StackOverflowError。

实际上，您可以“捕获”它们，这意味着在抛出异常时将执行catch(OutOfMemoryError ex)，但该块将自动将异常重新抛出给调用者。

我不认为公共类ChuckNorrisError extends Error可以解决这个问题，但是你可以尝试一下。我没有找到关于扩展错误的文档

你可以把ChuckNorris隐藏起来，也可以把他封装起来，也可以把他吞下去……

try {doChuckAction();} catch(ChuckNorrisException cne){/*做其他事情*/}

在这种例外情况下，显然必须使用System.exit(Integer.MIN_VALUE);从构造函数中，因为如果抛出这样的异常，就会发生这种情况;)

Two fundamental problems with exception handling in Java are that it uses the type of an exception to indicate whether action should be taken based upon it, and that anything which takes action based upon an exception (i.e. "catch"es it) is presumed to resolve the underlying condition. It would be useful to have a means by which an exception object could decide which handlers should execute, and whether the handlers that have executed so far have cleaned things up enough for the present method to satisfy its exit conditions. While this could be used to make "uncatchable" exceptions, two bigger uses would be to (1) make exceptions which will only be considered handled when they're caught by code that actually knows how to deal with them, and (2) allow for sensible handling of exceptions which occur in a finally block (if a FooException during a finally block during the unwinding of a BarException, both exceptions should propagate up the call stack; both should be catchable, but unwinding should continue until both have been caught). Unfortunately, I don't think there would be any way to make existing exception-handling code work that way without breaking things.

不。Java中的所有异常都必须成为Java .lang的子类。虽然这可能不是一个好的实践，但你可以像这样捕获每种类型的异常:

try {
    //Stuff
} catch ( Throwable T ){
    //Doesn't matter what it was, I caught it.
}

有关更多信息，请参阅java.lang.Throwable文档。

如果您试图避免检查异常(必须显式处理的异常)，那么您将希望继承Error或RuntimeException类。

任何代码都可以捕获Throwable。所以不，无论你创建什么异常都会是Throwable的子类并且会被捕获。