比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
当前回答
while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
case "$1" in
-n) name="$2"; shift 2;;
-p) pidfile="$2"; shift 2;;
-l) logfile="$2"; shift 2;;
--name=*) name="${1#*=}"; shift 1;;
--pidfile=*) pidfile="${1#*=}"; shift 1;;
--logfile=*) logfile="${1#*=}"; shift 1;;
--name|--pidfile|--logfile) echo "$1 requires an argument" >&2; exit 1;;
-*) echo "unknown option: $1" >&2; exit 1;;
*) handle_argument "$1"; shift 1;;
esac
done
此解决方案:
句柄-n arg和--name=arg允许在末尾使用参数如果有任何拼写错误,则显示正常错误兼容,不使用抨击可读,不需要在循环中维护状态
其他回答
while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
case "$1" in
-n) name="$2"; shift 2;;
-p) pidfile="$2"; shift 2;;
-l) logfile="$2"; shift 2;;
--name=*) name="${1#*=}"; shift 1;;
--pidfile=*) pidfile="${1#*=}"; shift 1;;
--logfile=*) logfile="${1#*=}"; shift 1;;
--name|--pidfile|--logfile) echo "$1 requires an argument" >&2; exit 1;;
-*) echo "unknown option: $1" >&2; exit 1;;
*) handle_argument "$1"; shift 1;;
esac
done
此解决方案:
句柄-n arg和--name=arg允许在末尾使用参数如果有任何拼写错误,则显示正常错误兼容,不使用抨击可读,不需要在循环中维护状态
当我尝试这个问题时,上面的答案似乎有点bug——这是我发现更强大的解决方案:
boolean_arg=""
arg_with_value=""
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]
do
key="$1"
case $key in
-b|--boolean-arg)
boolean_arg=true
shift
;;
-a|--arg-with-value)
arg_with_value="$2"
shift
shift
;;
-*)
echo "Unknown option: $1"
exit 1
;;
*)
arg_num=$(( $arg_num + 1 ))
case $arg_num in
1)
first_normal_arg="$1"
shift
;;
2)
second_normal_arg="$1"
shift
;;
*)
bad_args=TRUE
esac
;;
esac
done
# Handy to have this here when adding arguments to
# see if they're working. Just edit the '0' to be '1'.
if [[ 0 == 1 ]]; then
echo "first_normal_arg: $first_normal_arg"
echo "second_normal_arg: $second_normal_arg"
echo "boolean_arg: $boolean_arg"
echo "arg_with_value: $arg_with_value"
exit 0
fi
if [[ $bad_args == TRUE || $arg_num < 2 ]]; then
echo "Usage: $(basename "$0") <first-normal-arg> <second-normal-arg> [--boolean-arg] [--arg-with-value VALUE]"
exit 1
fi
我写了一个脚本,可以帮助轻松解析命令行参数https://github.com/unfor19/bargs
示例
$ bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
Name: Willy
Age: 99
Gender: male
Location: chocolate-factory
$ bash example.sh -n Meir --gender male
[ERROR] Required argument: age
Usage: bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
--person_name | -n [Willy] What is your name?
--age | -a [Required]
--gender | -g [Required]
--location | -l [chocolate-factory] insert your location
$ bash example.sh -h
Usage: bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
--person_name | -n [Willy] What is your name?
--age | -a [Required]
--gender | -g [Required]
--location | -l [chocolate-factory] insert your location
getopts非常有用,如果您首先安装了它,然后您打算在同一平台上运行它。例如,OSX和Linux在这方面的表现不同。
这里有一个(非getopts)解决方案,它支持等于、非等于和布尔标志。例如,您可以通过以下方式运行脚本:
./script --arg1=value1 --arg2 value2 --shouldClean
# parse the arguments.
COUNTER=0
ARGS=("$@")
while [ $COUNTER -lt $# ]
do
arg=${ARGS[$COUNTER]}
let COUNTER=COUNTER+1
nextArg=${ARGS[$COUNTER]}
if [[ $skipNext -eq 1 ]]; then
echo "Skipping"
skipNext=0
continue
fi
argKey=""
argVal=""
if [[ "$arg" =~ ^\- ]]; then
# if the format is: -key=value
if [[ "$arg" =~ \= ]]; then
argVal=$(echo "$arg" | cut -d'=' -f2)
argKey=$(echo "$arg" | cut -d'=' -f1)
skipNext=0
# if the format is: -key value
elif [[ ! "$nextArg" =~ ^\- ]]; then
argKey="$arg"
argVal="$nextArg"
skipNext=1
# if the format is: -key (a boolean flag)
elif [[ "$nextArg" =~ ^\- ]] || [[ -z "$nextArg" ]]; then
argKey="$arg"
argVal=""
skipNext=0
fi
# if the format has not flag, just a value.
else
argKey=""
argVal="$arg"
skipNext=0
fi
case "$argKey" in
--source-scmurl)
SOURCE_URL="$argVal"
;;
--dest-scmurl)
DEST_URL="$argVal"
;;
--version-num)
VERSION_NUM="$argVal"
;;
-c|--clean)
CLEAN_BEFORE_START="1"
;;
-h|--help|-help|--h)
showUsage
exit
;;
esac
done
另一个Shell参数分析器(ASAP)
符合POSIX,无getopt
我受到@bronson相对简单的回答的启发,并试图改进它(不增加太多复杂性)。结果如下:
使用-n[arg]、-abn[arg],--name[arg]和--name=arg样式中的任意一种选项;参数可以按任何顺序出现,循环后$@中只留下位置参数;使用--强制将剩余的参数视为位置参数;检测无效选项和缺少的参数;不依赖于getopt或外部工具(一个功能使用简单的sed命令);便携式,紧凑,可读性强,具有独立功能。
# Convenience functions.
usage_error () { echo >&2 "$(basename $0): $1"; exit 2; }
assert_argument () { test "$1" != "$EOL" || usage_error "$2 requires an argument"; }
# One loop, nothing more.
if [ "$#" != 0 ]; then
EOL=$(printf '\1\3\3\7')
set -- "$@" "$EOL"
while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do
opt="$1"; shift
case "$opt" in
# Your options go here.
-f|--flag) flag='true';;
-n|--name) assert_argument "$1" "$opt"; name="$1"; shift;;
# Arguments processing. You may remove any unneeded line after the 1st.
-|''|[!-]*) set -- "$@" "$opt";; # positional argument, rotate to the end
--*=*) set -- "${opt%%=*}" "${opt#*=}" "$@";; # convert '--name=arg' to '--name' 'arg'
-[!-]?*) set -- $(echo "${opt#-}" | sed 's/\(.\)/ -\1/g') "$@";; # convert '-abc' to '-a' '-b' '-c'
--) while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do set -- "$@" "$1"; shift; done;; # process remaining arguments as positional
-*) usage_error "unknown option: '$opt'";; # catch misspelled options
*) usage_error "this should NEVER happen ($opt)";; # sanity test for previous patterns
esac
done
shift # $EOL
fi
# Do something cool with "$@"... \o/
注:我知道。。。二进制模式为0x01030307的参数可能会破坏逻辑。但是,如果有人在命令行中传递这样的参数,他们应该得到它。