比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
当前回答
另一个Shell参数分析器(ASAP)
符合POSIX,无getopt
我受到@bronson相对简单的回答的启发,并试图改进它(不增加太多复杂性)。结果如下:
使用-n[arg]、-abn[arg],--name[arg]和--name=arg样式中的任意一种选项;参数可以按任何顺序出现,循环后$@中只留下位置参数;使用--强制将剩余的参数视为位置参数;检测无效选项和缺少的参数;不依赖于getopt或外部工具(一个功能使用简单的sed命令);便携式,紧凑,可读性强,具有独立功能。
# Convenience functions.
usage_error () { echo >&2 "$(basename $0): $1"; exit 2; }
assert_argument () { test "$1" != "$EOL" || usage_error "$2 requires an argument"; }
# One loop, nothing more.
if [ "$#" != 0 ]; then
EOL=$(printf '\1\3\3\7')
set -- "$@" "$EOL"
while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do
opt="$1"; shift
case "$opt" in
# Your options go here.
-f|--flag) flag='true';;
-n|--name) assert_argument "$1" "$opt"; name="$1"; shift;;
# Arguments processing. You may remove any unneeded line after the 1st.
-|''|[!-]*) set -- "$@" "$opt";; # positional argument, rotate to the end
--*=*) set -- "${opt%%=*}" "${opt#*=}" "$@";; # convert '--name=arg' to '--name' 'arg'
-[!-]?*) set -- $(echo "${opt#-}" | sed 's/\(.\)/ -\1/g') "$@";; # convert '-abc' to '-a' '-b' '-c'
--) while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do set -- "$@" "$1"; shift; done;; # process remaining arguments as positional
-*) usage_error "unknown option: '$opt'";; # catch misspelled options
*) usage_error "this should NEVER happen ($opt)";; # sanity test for previous patterns
esac
done
shift # $EOL
fi
# Do something cool with "$@"... \o/
注:我知道。。。二进制模式为0x01030307的参数可能会破坏逻辑。但是,如果有人在命令行中传递这样的参数,他们应该得到它。
其他回答
我想提供我的选项解析版本,它允许以下内容:
-s p1
--stage p1
-w somefolder
--workfolder somefolder
-sw p1 somefolder
-e=hello
也允许这样做(可能不需要):
-s--workfolder p1 somefolder
-se=hello p1
-swe=hello p1 somefolder
您必须在使用前决定是否在选项上使用=。这是为了保持代码干净。
while [[ $# > 0 ]]
do
key="$1"
while [[ ${key+x} ]]
do
case $key in
-s*|--stage)
STAGE="$2"
shift # option has parameter
;;
-w*|--workfolder)
workfolder="$2"
shift # option has parameter
;;
-e=*)
EXAMPLE="${key#*=}"
break # option has been fully handled
;;
*)
# unknown option
echo Unknown option: $key #1>&2
exit 10 # either this: my preferred way to handle unknown options
break # or this: do this to signal the option has been handled (if exit isn't used)
;;
esac
# prepare for next option in this key, if any
[[ "$key" = -? || "$key" == --* ]] && unset key || key="${key/#-?/-}"
done
shift # option(s) fully processed, proceed to next input argument
done
我已经编写了一个bash助手来编写一个不错的bash工具
项目主页:https://gitlab.mbedsys.org/mbedsys/bashopts
例子:
#!/bin/bash -ei
# load the library
. bashopts.sh
# Enable backtrace dusplay on error
trap 'bashopts_exit_handle' ERR
# Initialize the library
bashopts_setup -n "$0" -d "This is myapp tool description displayed on help message" -s "$HOME/.config/myapprc"
# Declare the options
bashopts_declare -n first_name -l first -o f -d "First name" -t string -i -s -r
bashopts_declare -n last_name -l last -o l -d "Last name" -t string -i -s -r
bashopts_declare -n display_name -l display-name -t string -d "Display name" -e "\$first_name \$last_name"
bashopts_declare -n age -l number -d "Age" -t number
bashopts_declare -n email_list -t string -m add -l email -d "Email adress"
# Parse arguments
bashopts_parse_args "$@"
# Process argument
bashopts_process_args
将提供帮助:
NAME:
./example.sh - This is myapp tool description displayed on help message
USAGE:
[options and commands] [-- [extra args]]
OPTIONS:
-h,--help Display this help
-n,--non-interactive true Non interactive mode - [$bashopts_non_interactive] (type:boolean, default:false)
-f,--first "John" First name - [$first_name] (type:string, default:"")
-l,--last "Smith" Last name - [$last_name] (type:string, default:"")
--display-name "John Smith" Display name - [$display_name] (type:string, default:"$first_name $last_name")
--number 0 Age - [$age] (type:number, default:0)
--email Email adress - [$email_list] (type:string, default:"")
享受:)
我使用optget和optgets的组合来解析带或不带参数的短选项和长选项,甚至是非选项(不带-或-的选项):
# catch wrong options and move non-options to the end of the string
args=$(getopt -l "$opt_long" "$opt_short" "$@" 2> >(sed -e 's/^/stderr/g')) || echo -n "Error: " && echo "$args" | grep -oP "(?<=^stderr).*" && exit 1
mapfile -t args < <(xargs -n1 <<< "$(echo "$args" | sed -E "s/(--[^ ]+) /\1=/g")" )
set -- "${args[@]}"
# parse short and long options
while getopts "$opt_short-:" opt; do
...
done
# remove all parsed options from $@
shift $((OPTIND-1)
这样,我就可以使用$opt_verbose这样的变量访问所有选项,而非选项可以通过默认变量$1、$2等访问:
echo "help:$opt_help"
echo "file:$opt_file"
echo "verbose:$opt_verbose"
echo "long_only:$opt_long_only"
echo "short_only:$opt_s"
echo "path:$1"
echo "mail:$2"
其中一个主要特点是,我能够以完全随机的顺序传递所有选项和非选项:
# $opt_file $1 $2 $opt_... $opt_... $opt_...
# /demo.sh --file=file.txt /dir info@example.com -V -h --long_only=yes -s
help:1
file:file.txt
verbose:1
long_only:yes
short_only:1
path:/dir
mail:info@example.com
更多详情:https://stackoverflow.com/a/74275254/318765
这里有一个getopts,它用最少的代码实现解析,并允许您在一种情况下使用eval和substring定义要提取的内容。
基本上eval“local key='val'”
function myrsync() {
local backup=("${@}") args=(); while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do k="$1";
case "$k" in
---sourceuser|---sourceurl|---targetuser|---targeturl|---file|---exclude|---include)
eval "local ${k:3}='${2}'"; shift; shift # Past two arguments
;;
*) # Unknown option
args+=("$1"); shift; # Past argument only
;;
esac
done; set -- "${backup[@]}" # Restore $@
echo "${sourceurl}"
}
在这里,将变量声明为局部变量,而不是全局变量。
调用为:
myrsync ---sourceurl http://abc.def.g ---sourceuser myuser ...
${k:3}基本上是一个从键中删除第一个---的子字符串。
getopt()/getopts()是一个很好的选项。从此处复制:
“getopt”的简单用法如下小脚本所示:
#!/bin/bash
echo "Before getopt"
for i
do
echo $i
done
args=`getopt abc:d $*`
set -- $args
echo "After getopt"
for i
do
echo "-->$i"
done
我们所说的是,-b、 -c或-d将被允许,但-c后面跟着一个参数(“c:”表示)。如果我们称之为“g”并尝试:
bash-2.05a$ ./g -abc foo
Before getopt
-abc
foo
After getopt
-->-a
-->-b
-->-c
-->foo
-->--
我们从两个参数开始“getopt”将选项和每个人都有自己的论点。它也是添加了“--”。