假设我有一个左外连接，如下所示:
from f in Foo
join b in Bar on f.Foo_Id equals b.Foo_Id into g
from result in g.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new { Foo = f, Bar = result }
如何使用扩展方法表达相同的任务?如。
Foo.GroupJoin(Bar, f => f.Foo_Id, b => b.Foo_Id, (f,b) => ???)
.Select(???)
当前回答
由于这似乎是使用方法(扩展)语法的左外连接的事实上的SO问题，我想我应该在当前选择的答案之外添加一个替代方案(至少在我的经验中)，这是我更常见的答案
// Option 1: Expecting either 0 or 1 matches from the "Right"
// table (Bars in this case):
var qry = Foos.GroupJoin(
Bars,
foo => foo.Foo_Id,
bar => bar.Foo_Id,
(f,bs) => new { Foo = f, Bar = bs.SingleOrDefault() });
// Option 2: Expecting either 0 or more matches from the "Right" table
// (courtesy of currently selected answer):
var qry = Foos.GroupJoin(
Bars,
foo => foo.Foo_Id,
bar => bar.Foo_Id,
(f,bs) => new { Foo = f, Bars = bs })
.SelectMany(
fooBars => fooBars.Bars.DefaultIfEmpty(),
(x,y) => new { Foo = x.Foo, Bar = y });
要使用一个简单的数据集来显示差异(假设我们是根据值本身进行连接):
List<int> tableA = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3 };
List<int?> tableB = new List<int?> { 3, 4, 5 };
// Result using both Option 1 and 2. Option 1 would be a better choice
// if we didn't expect multiple matches in tableB.
{ A = 1, B = null }
{ A = 2, B = null }
{ A = 3, B = 3 }
List<int> tableA = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3 };
List<int?> tableB = new List<int?> { 3, 3, 4 };
// Result using Option 1 would be that an exception gets thrown on
// SingleOrDefault(), but if we use FirstOrDefault() instead to illustrate:
{ A = 1, B = null }
{ A = 2, B = null }
{ A = 3, B = 3 } // Misleading, we had multiple matches.
// Which 3 should get selected (not arbitrarily the first)?.
// Result using Option 2:
{ A = 1, B = null }
{ A = 2, B = null }
{ A = 3, B = 3 }
{ A = 3, B = 3 }
选项2对于典型的左外连接定义是正确的，但正如我前面提到的，根据数据集的不同，它通常是不必要的复杂。
其他回答
由于这似乎是使用方法(扩展)语法的左外连接的事实上的SO问题，我想我应该在当前选择的答案之外添加一个替代方案(至少在我的经验中)，这是我更常见的答案
// Option 1: Expecting either 0 or 1 matches from the "Right"
// table (Bars in this case):
var qry = Foos.GroupJoin(
Bars,
foo => foo.Foo_Id,
bar => bar.Foo_Id,
(f,bs) => new { Foo = f, Bar = bs.SingleOrDefault() });
// Option 2: Expecting either 0 or more matches from the "Right" table
// (courtesy of currently selected answer):
var qry = Foos.GroupJoin(
Bars,
foo => foo.Foo_Id,
bar => bar.Foo_Id,
(f,bs) => new { Foo = f, Bars = bs })
.SelectMany(
fooBars => fooBars.Bars.DefaultIfEmpty(),
(x,y) => new { Foo = x.Foo, Bar = y });
要使用一个简单的数据集来显示差异(假设我们是根据值本身进行连接):
List<int> tableA = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3 };
List<int?> tableB = new List<int?> { 3, 4, 5 };
// Result using both Option 1 and 2. Option 1 would be a better choice
// if we didn't expect multiple matches in tableB.
{ A = 1, B = null }
{ A = 2, B = null }
{ A = 3, B = 3 }
List<int> tableA = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3 };
List<int?> tableB = new List<int?> { 3, 3, 4 };
// Result using Option 1 would be that an exception gets thrown on
// SingleOrDefault(), but if we use FirstOrDefault() instead to illustrate:
{ A = 1, B = null }
{ A = 2, B = null }
{ A = 3, B = 3 } // Misleading, we had multiple matches.
// Which 3 should get selected (not arbitrarily the first)?.
// Result using Option 2:
{ A = 1, B = null }
{ A = 2, B = null }
{ A = 3, B = 3 }
{ A = 3, B = 3 }
选项2对于典型的左外连接定义是正确的，但正如我前面提到的，根据数据集的不同，它通常是不必要的复杂。
将Marc Gravell的答案转换为一个扩展方法，我做了以下工作。
internal static IEnumerable<Tuple<TLeft, TRight>> LeftJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey>(
this IEnumerable<TLeft> left,
IEnumerable<TRight> right,
Func<TLeft, TKey> selectKeyLeft,
Func<TRight, TKey> selectKeyRight,
TRight defaultRight = default(TRight),
IEqualityComparer<TKey> cmp = null)
{
return left.GroupJoin(
right,
selectKeyLeft,
selectKeyRight,
(x, y) => new Tuple<TLeft, IEnumerable<TRight>>(x, y),
cmp ?? EqualityComparer<TKey>.Default)
.SelectMany(
x => x.Item2.DefaultIfEmpty(defaultRight),
(x, y) => new Tuple<TLeft, TRight>(x.Item1, y));
}
Marc Gravell的答案变成了一个支持IQueryable<T>接口的扩展方法，并添加了对c# 8.0 NRT的支持，如下所示:
#nullable enable
using LinqKit;
using LinqKit.Core;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
...
/// <summary>
/// Left join queryable. Linq to SQL compatible. IMPORTANT: any Includes must be put on the source collections before calling this method.
/// </summary>
public static IQueryable<TResult> LeftJoin<TOuter, TInner, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TOuter> outer,
IQueryable<TInner> inner,
Expression<Func<TOuter, TKey>> outerKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TInner, TKey>> innerKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TOuter, TInner?, TResult>> resultSelector)
{
return outer
.AsExpandable()
.GroupJoin(
inner,
outerKeySelector,
innerKeySelector,
(outerItem, innerItems) => new { outerItem, innerItems })
.SelectMany(
joinResult => joinResult.innerItems.DefaultIfEmpty(),
(joinResult, innerItem) =>
resultSelector.Invoke(joinResult.outerItem, innerItem));
}
对我来说更简单。
var appuser = appUsers.GroupJoin(trackLogin, u => u.Id, ur => ur.UserId, (u, ur) => new { u = u, ur = ur })
.Select( m => new { m.u.Id, m.u.Email, m.u.IsSuperUser, m.u.RoleId,
LastLogin = m.ur.Select(t => t.LastLogin).FirstOrDefault()}).ToList();
你可以创建这样的扩展方法:
public static IEnumerable<TResult> LeftOuterJoin<TSource, TInner, TKey, TResult>(this IEnumerable<TSource> source, IEnumerable<TInner> other, Func<TSource, TKey> func, Func<TInner, TKey> innerkey, Func<TSource, TInner, TResult> res)
{
return from f in source
join b in other on func.Invoke(f) equals innerkey.Invoke(b) into g
from result in g.DefaultIfEmpty()
select res.Invoke(f, result);
}
