如果你有一个加权字典而不是一个列表，你可以这样写

items = { "a": 10, "b": 5, "c": 1 } 
random.choice([k for k in items for dummy in range(items[k])])

注意(k, k范围的虚拟物品(物品[k])]产生这个列表(' a ', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' c ', ' b ', ' b ', ' b ', ' b ', ' b ']

将权重排列成a 累积分布。 使用random.random()来选择一个随机的 浮点0.0 <= x < total。 搜索 用等分法进行分布。二等分的 如http://docs.python.org/dev/library/bisect.html#other-examples中的示例所示。

from random import random
from bisect import bisect

def weighted_choice(choices):
    values, weights = zip(*choices)
    total = 0
    cum_weights = []
    for w in weights:
        total += w
        cum_weights.append(total)
    x = random() * total
    i = bisect(cum_weights, x)
    return values[i]

>>> weighted_choice([("WHITE",90), ("RED",8), ("GREEN",2)])
'WHITE'

如果需要做出多个选择，可以将其分成两个函数，一个用于构建累积权重，另一个用于对随机点进行等分。

我看了指向的其他线程，并在我的编码风格中提出了这种变化，这返回了用于计数的索引，但返回字符串很简单(注释返回替代):

import random
import bisect

try:
    range = xrange
except:
    pass

def weighted_choice(choices):
    total, cumulative = 0, []
    for c,w in choices:
        total += w
        cumulative.append((total, c))
    r = random.uniform(0, total)
    # return index
    return bisect.bisect(cumulative, (r,))
    # return item string
    #return choices[bisect.bisect(cumulative, (r,))][0]

# define choices and relative weights
choices = [("WHITE",90), ("RED",8), ("GREEN",2)]

tally = [0 for item in choices]

n = 100000
# tally up n weighted choices
for i in range(n):
    tally[weighted_choice(choices)] += 1

print([t/sum(tally)*100 for t in tally])

粗糙的，但可能足够:

import random
weighted_choice = lambda s : random.choice(sum(([v]*wt for v,wt in s),[]))

这有用吗?

# define choices and relative weights
choices = [("WHITE",90), ("RED",8), ("GREEN",2)]

# initialize tally dict
tally = dict.fromkeys(choices, 0)

# tally up 1000 weighted choices
for i in xrange(1000):
    tally[weighted_choice(choices)] += 1

print tally.items()

打印:

[('WHITE', 904), ('GREEN', 22), ('RED', 74)]

假设所有权重都是整数。它们的和不一定是100，我这么做只是为了让测试结果更容易理解。(如果权重是浮点数，则将它们都乘以10，直到所有权重>= 1。)

weights = [.6, .2, .001, .199]
while any(w < 1.0 for w in weights):
    weights = [w*10 for w in weights]
weights = map(int, weights)

这取决于你想对分布进行多少次抽样。

假设要对分布进行K次抽样。当n是分布中的项数时，每次使用np.random.choice()的时间复杂度为O(K(n + log(n)))。

在我的例子中，我需要对相同的分布进行多次采样，阶数为10^3其中n阶数为10^6。我使用了下面的代码，它预先计算了累积分布，并在O(log(n))中对其进行采样。总体时间复杂度为O(n+K*log(n))。

import numpy as np

n,k = 10**6,10**3

# Create dummy distribution
a = np.array([i+1 for i in range(n)])
p = np.array([1.0/n]*n)

cfd = p.cumsum()
for _ in range(k):
    x = np.random.uniform()
    idx = cfd.searchsorted(x, side='right')
    sampled_element = a[idx]

我不喜欢它们的语法。我只想具体说明这些项目是什么以及每项的权重是多少。我意识到我可以用随机。选项，但我很快就写了下面的类。

import random, string
from numpy import cumsum

class randomChoiceWithProportions:
    '''
    Accepts a dictionary of choices as keys and weights as values. Example if you want a unfair dice:


    choiceWeightDic = {"1":0.16666666666666666, "2": 0.16666666666666666, "3": 0.16666666666666666
    , "4": 0.16666666666666666, "5": .06666666666666666, "6": 0.26666666666666666}
    dice = randomChoiceWithProportions(choiceWeightDic)

    samples = []
    for i in range(100000):
        samples.append(dice.sample())

    # Should be close to .26666
    samples.count("6")/len(samples)

    # Should be close to .16666
    samples.count("1")/len(samples)
    '''
    def __init__(self, choiceWeightDic):
        self.choiceWeightDic = choiceWeightDic
        weightSum = sum(self.choiceWeightDic.values())
        assert weightSum == 1, 'Weights sum to ' + str(weightSum) + ', not 1.'
        self.valWeightDict = self._compute_valWeights()

    def _compute_valWeights(self):
        valWeights = list(cumsum(list(self.choiceWeightDic.values())))
        valWeightDict = dict(zip(list(self.choiceWeightDic.keys()), valWeights))
        return valWeightDict

    def sample(self):
        num = random.uniform(0,1)
        for key, val in self.valWeightDict.items():
            if val >= num:
                return key