random.choice的加权版本

我需要写一个加权版的random。选择(列表中的每个元素有不同的被选择的概率)。这是我想到的:

def weightedChoice(choices):
    """Like random.choice, but each element can have a different chance of
    being selected.

    choices can be any iterable containing iterables with two items each.
    Technically, they can have more than two items, the rest will just be
    ignored.  The first item is the thing being chosen, the second item is
    its weight.  The weights can be any numeric values, what matters is the
    relative differences between them.
    """
    space = {}
    current = 0
    for choice, weight in choices:
        if weight > 0:
            space[current] = choice
            current += weight
    rand = random.uniform(0, current)
    for key in sorted(space.keys() + [current]):
        if rand < key:
            return choice
        choice = space[key]
    return None

这个函数对我来说太复杂了，而且很丑。我希望这里的每个人都能提供一些改进的建议或其他方法。对我来说，效率没有代码的整洁和可读性重要。

当前回答

通解:

import random
def weighted_choice(choices, weights):
    total = sum(weights)
    treshold = random.uniform(0, total)
    for k, weight in enumerate(weights):
        total -= weight
        if total < treshold:
            return choices[k]

2013-06-09 15:26:44

其他回答

假设你有

items = [11, 23, 43, 91] 
probability = [0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.1]

你有一个函数，它生成一个介于[0,1)之间的随机数(我们可以在这里使用random.random())。现在求概率的前缀和

prefix_probability=[0.2,0.5,0.9,1]

现在，我们只需取一个0-1之间的随机数，然后使用二分搜索来查找该数字在prefix_probability中的位置。这个索引就是你的答案

代码是这样的

return items[bisect.bisect(prefix_probability,random.random())]

2022-11-29 07:35:14

一种方法是随机化所有权重的总和，然后使用这些值作为每个变量的极限点。以下是作为生成器的粗略实现。

def rand_weighted(weights):
    """
    Generator which uses the weights to generate a
    weighted random values
    """
    sum_weights = sum(weights.values())
    cum_weights = {}
    current_weight = 0
    for key, value in sorted(weights.iteritems()):
        current_weight += value
        cum_weights[key] = current_weight
    while True:
        sel = int(random.uniform(0, 1) * sum_weights)
        for key, value in sorted(cum_weights.iteritems()):
            if sel < value:
                break
        yield key

2017-11-22 17:22:51

def weighted_choice(choices):
   total = sum(w for c, w in choices)
   r = random.uniform(0, total)
   upto = 0
   for c, w in choices:
      if upto + w >= r:
         return c
      upto += w
   assert False, "Shouldn't get here"

2010-09-09 19:08:40

为random.choice()提供一个预先加权的列表:

解决方案和测试:

import random

options = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
weights = [1, 2, 5, 2]

weighted_options = [[opt]*wgt for opt, wgt in zip(options, weights)]
weighted_options = [opt for sublist in weighted_options for opt in sublist]
print(weighted_options)

# test

counts = {c: 0 for c in options}
for x in range(10000):
    counts[random.choice(weighted_options)] += 1

for opt, wgt in zip(options, weights):
    wgt_r = counts[opt] / 10000 * sum(weights)
    print(opt, counts[opt], wgt, wgt_r)

输出:

['a', 'b', 'b', 'c', 'c', 'c', 'c', 'c', 'd', 'd']
a 1025 1 1.025
b 1948 2 1.948
c 5019 5 5.019
d 2008 2 2.008

2019-10-02 18:37:14

我看了指向的其他线程，并在我的编码风格中提出了这种变化，这返回了用于计数的索引，但返回字符串很简单(注释返回替代):

import random
import bisect

try:
    range = xrange
except:
    pass

def weighted_choice(choices):
    total, cumulative = 0, []
    for c,w in choices:
        total += w
        cumulative.append((total, c))
    r = random.uniform(0, total)
    # return index
    return bisect.bisect(cumulative, (r,))
    # return item string
    #return choices[bisect.bisect(cumulative, (r,))][0]

# define choices and relative weights
choices = [("WHITE",90), ("RED",8), ("GREEN",2)]

tally = [0 for item in choices]

n = 100000
# tally up n weighted choices
for i in range(n):
    tally[weighted_choice(choices)] += 1

print([t/sum(tally)*100 for t in tally])

2011-04-08 18:33:51

random.choice的加权版本

推荐文章

最新文章

标签