我正在对初级(也许是高级)软件工程师所犯的常见错误和错误假设进行一些研究。
你坚持时间最长、最终被纠正的假设是什么?
例如，我误解了整数的大小不是标准的，而是取决于语言和目标。说起来有点尴尬，但事实就是这样。
坦率地说;你有什么坚定的信念?你大概坚持了多长时间?它可以是关于一种算法、一种语言、一个编程概念、测试，或者任何关于编程、编程语言或计算机科学的东西。
当前回答
我知道要编写一个合适的web应用程序，当我必须设计在所有浏览器上都能运行的东西时，我很清楚这一点。
其他回答
C/ c++中if语句的求值顺序是特定于编译器的。所以写作:
if (pointer != NULL) && (pointer->doSomething())
是不安全的，因为可以交换求值顺序。我最近发现(在多年的谎言之后)，它是ANSI-C规范的一部分，您可以保证订单和它的完全安全。
詹姆斯
My co-workers were/are producing supposedly bad code because they sucked/suck. It took me a while to learn that I should first check what really happened. Most of the times, bad code was caused by lack of management, customers who didn't want to check what they really wanted and started changing their minds like there's no tomorrow, or other circunstances out of anyone's control, like economic crysis. Customers demand "for yesterday" features because they are stupid: Not really. It's about communication. If someone tells them it everything can really be done in 1 week, guess what? they'll want it in 1 week. "Never change code that works". This is not a good thing IMO. You obviously don't have to change what's really working. However, if you never change a piece of code because it's supposedly working and it's too complex to change, you may end up finding out that code isn't really doing what it's supposed to do. Eg: I've seen a sales commission calculation software doing wrong calculations for two years because nobody wanted to maintain the software. Nobody at sales knew about it. The formula was so complex they didn't really know how to check the numbers.
每个人都想为一个问题写出最好的、最合适的代码……
理解指针和递归是非常困难的。
VB6中的Integers与。net大小不同。
VB6可以进行位级操作。
专业程序员制作没有bug的软件。
常见的错误假设:“代码质量是次要的”。 更糟糕的假设是:“代码质量一点都不重要。”
代码质量是一个非常宽泛的概念。我在这里已经详细讨论过了。
