像Python或Ruby这样的动态类型语言不太适合用于大型项目。

您无法诊断生产中的“间歇性错误”。重新启动服务器是解决这个问题的唯一方法。

也许在我早期的ASP编码中更真实。但是有很多很好的分析工具可以发现内存泄漏和其他奇怪的问题。Perfmon还提供了许多良好的诊断数据。另外，您应该在应用程序中编写诊断日志。

我从没想过我会成为一名专业程序员，我以为我会从事电子工作。但最终，编程更容易，薪水也更高，所以最初的副业变成了我的主要工作。

我很早就开始学习编程了。那时我14岁左右。我有各种疯狂的想法，但不要问我准确的时间，因为那是很久以前的事了。

Ok, so, I believed for a while that if you use the term synchronize in Java, then Java solves this nasting synchronizing thing for you I believed for at least half a year, likely more, that static typing would improve performance. I believed that freeing something would return memory back to the OS. I believed that malloc calls boil down to checking if there is enough free space on the OS, so malloc would be inexpensive. I thought a long while that Java was built with all the benefits and flaws of the other languages in mind, into a "perfect blend" that would take the best properties of the other languages and reject the mistakes. I vastly overestimated the number of cases where LinkedLists outperform ArrayLists. I thought that NP-hardness was a proof that no INSTANCE could be solved efficiently, which is trivially false, for a while. I thought that finding the best flight-plan on travel agency web sites would take so long because of the "Travelling Salesman Problem", as I proudly chuckled to my relatives (when I was small, alright?!)

还能想出更多。不知道我坚持了多久。对不起。

PS: 啊，好吧，这个被清除得并不慢，但我看到新手时不时地这样做，所以我想你可能会感兴趣:我还认为要存储不确定数量的东西，你需要为每个东西声明一个新变量。所以我要创建变量a1 a2 a3…，而不是使用一个变量a，我将它声明为一个向量。

我以为这将是一场过山车之旅，里面有飞驰的汽车、放荡的女人、私人飞机和大胆的冒险。等着瞧吧，直到我得到那个职业顾问....

私有成员变量是实例私有的，而不是类私有的。