“On Error Resume Next”是某种错误处理

Python是一种不切实际的、令人讨厌的语言(我仍然可以读到一些关于我早期代码的注释，抱怨它)，而c++是唯一真正的面向对象语言。

我错得太离谱了，到现在还觉得羞愧。

用汇编语言进行优化=重写。

When I first really understood assembly (coming from BASIC) it seemed that the only way to make code run faster was to rewrite it in assembly. Took quite a few years to realize that compilers can be very good at optimization and especially with CPUs with branch prediction etc they can probably do a better job than a human can do in a reasonable amount of time. Also that spending time on optimizing the algorithm is likely to give you a better win than spending time converting from a high to a low level language. Also that premature optimization is the root of all evil...

我写的所有东西在可预见的未来都会失败。

并不是说一切最终都不会崩溃，而是在我的编程教育早期，当我发现try. catch块…我把所有的东西都包在里面....有些事情，如果失败了，将代表比我的程序处理的更大的问题(例如，北极和南极互换了位置)。

作为一名老的过程式程序员，当我第一次开始为一个业余项目用Java编程时，我并不真正理解OO。编写了大量的代码，却没有真正理解接口的意义，试图通过将所有东西都强制放到继承层次结构中来最大化代码重用——当一个层次结构无法容纳清理时，希望Java具有多重继承。我的代码成功了，但我现在对早期的东西感到畏缩。

When I started reading about dynamic languages and trying to figure out a good one to learn, reading about Python's significant whitespace turned me off - I was convinced that I would hate that. But when I eventually learned Python, it became something I really like. We generally make the effort in whatever language to have consistent indent levels, but get nothing for it in return (other than the visual readability). In Python, I found that I wasn't doing any more effort than I had before with regard to indent levels, and Python handled what I'd been having to use braces or whatever for in other languages. It makes Python feel cleaner to me now.

c++在本质上比所有其他语言都要好。

这是我在大学前几年从一个朋友那里收到的。我带着它很长一段时间(我现在脸红了)。只有在与它一起工作了2年左右之后，我才能看到它们的裂缝是什么。

没有人，也没有什么事是完美的，总有改进的空间。