代码审查是浪费时间。

从一家完全可选的公司搬到一家强制性的公司(甚至是被审计的)，我逐渐明白了它们的用处。对代码有另一双眼睛，即使是最琐碎的部分，也可以:

A)当你搞砸了一些琐碎的事情时，避免你的尴尬(例如，在我之前的工作中，一个琐碎的代码审查可以防止我们向客户发送数百封垃圾邮件)

B)可以教给你你一开始不知道的东西(我在我目前的工作中学习了新的库——不可避免的是在一家大公司，有人已经偶然发现了你的问题，并做了更好的解决工作——这只是知道在哪里寻找的问题)

C)至少要确保除了你自己之外还有其他人知道事情是如何运作的。

最后，我对我在这里提交的代码比我以前的工作更满意，尽管那时我认为我什么都知道:)

像Python或Ruby这样的动态类型语言不太适合用于大型项目。

在正式发布之前，没有缺陷是可能的。

这绝对不是真的，即使P2缺陷有时也会被打开。

与自动化相结合的编程优雅是老式测试的充分替代品。

My co-workers were/are producing supposedly bad code because they sucked/suck. It took me a while to learn that I should first check what really happened. Most of the times, bad code was caused by lack of management, customers who didn't want to check what they really wanted and started changing their minds like there's no tomorrow, or other circunstances out of anyone's control, like economic crysis. Customers demand "for yesterday" features because they are stupid: Not really. It's about communication. If someone tells them it everything can really be done in 1 week, guess what? they'll want it in 1 week. "Never change code that works". This is not a good thing IMO. You obviously don't have to change what's really working. However, if you never change a piece of code because it's supposedly working and it's too complex to change, you may end up finding out that code isn't really doing what it's supposed to do. Eg: I've seen a sales commission calculation software doing wrong calculations for two years because nobody wanted to maintain the software. Nobody at sales knew about it. The formula was so complex they didn't really know how to check the numbers.

我一直认为，要成为一名优秀的程序员，必须了解系统的所有内部工作原理。我很羞愧，因为在开始编码之前，我不知道关于这门语言的一切，比如它的库、模式、代码片段。 我不再那么天真了。