我试着:
somearray = ["some", "thing"]
anotherarray = ["another", "thing"]
somearray.push(anotherarray.flatten!)
我预期的
["some", "thing", "another", "thing"]
但有
["some", "thing", nil]
我试着:
somearray = ["some", "thing"]
anotherarray = ["another", "thing"]
somearray.push(anotherarray.flatten!)
我预期的
["some", "thing", "another", "thing"]
但有
["some", "thing", nil]
当前回答
a = ["some", "thing"]
b = ["another", "thing"]
将b追加到a并将结果存储在a中:
a.push(*b)
or
a += b
在这两种情况下,a都变成:
["some", "thing", "another", "thing"]
但在前一种情况下,b的元素被追加到现有的a数组中,在后一种情况下,两个数组连接在一起,结果存储在a中。
其他回答
你可以使用+运算符!
irb(main):001:0> a = [1,2]
=> [1, 2]
irb(main):002:0> b = [3,4]
=> [3, 4]
irb(main):003:0> a + b
=> [1, 2, 3, 4]
你可以在这里阅读关于数组类的所有内容: http://ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Array.html
这里有两种方法,注意在这个例子中,第一种方法分配一个新数组(转换为somearray = somearray + anotherarray)
somearray = ["some", "thing"]
anotherarray = ["another", "thing"]
somearray += anotherarray # => ["some", "thing", "another", "thing"]
somearray = ["some", "thing"]
somearray.concat anotherarray # => ["some", "thing", "another", "thing"]
适用于Ruby版本>= 2.0但不适用于旧版本的简单方法:
irb(main):001:0> a=[1,2]
=> [1, 2]
irb(main):003:0> b=[3,4]
=> [3, 4]
irb(main):002:0> c=[5,6]
=> [5, 6]
irb(main):004:0> [*a,*b,*c]
=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
详细阐述@Pilcrow的答案,对于大型数组唯一合适的答案是concat(+),因为它速度快,并且在循环中操作时不会分配一个新对象来进行垃圾回收。
下面是基准:
require 'benchmark'
huge_ary_1 = Array.new(1_000_000) { rand(5_000_000..30_000_00) }
huge_ary_2 = Array.new(1_000_000) { rand(35_000_000..55_000_00) }
Benchmark.bm do |bm|
p '-------------------CONCAT ----------------'
bm.report { huge_ary_1.concat(huge_ary_2) }
p '------------------- PUSH ----------------'
bm.report { huge_ary_1.push(*huge_ary_2) }
end
结果:
user system total real
"-------------------CONCAT ----------------"
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.009388)
"------------------- PUSH ----------------"
example/array_concat_vs_push.rb:13:in `block (2 levels) in <main>': stack level too deep (SystemStackError)
正如你所看到的,当数组足够大时,使用push会抛出ERROR:堆栈级别太深(SystemStackError)。
(array1 + array2).uniq
这样你就可以先得到array1元素。你不会得到副本。