YAML和JSON之间有什么不同,特别是考虑到以下事情?
性能(编码/解码时间) 内存消耗 表达清晰 库可用性,易用性(我更喜欢C)
我打算在我们的嵌入式系统中使用这两个中的一个来存储配置文件。
相关:
应该使用YAML还是JSON来存储Perl数据?
YAML和JSON之间有什么不同,特别是考虑到以下事情?
性能(编码/解码时间) 内存消耗 表达清晰 库可用性,易用性(我更喜欢C)
我打算在我们的嵌入式系统中使用这两个中的一个来存储配置文件。
相关:
应该使用YAML还是JSON来存储Perl数据?
当前回答
GIT 和 YAML
其他答案都很好。先读这些。但是我还要加上另一个有时使用YAML的原因:git。
越来越多的编程项目使用git存储库进行分发和归档。而且,虽然git回购的历史记录可以同样存储JSON和YAML文件,但用于跟踪和显示文件更改的“diff”方法是面向行的。由于YAML被迫面向行,因此YAML文件中的任何小更改都更容易被人看到。
当然,JSON文件确实可以通过对字符串/键进行排序和添加缩进来“变得漂亮”。但这不是默认的,我很懒。
就我个人而言,我通常使用JSON进行系统到系统的交互。我经常将YAML用于配置文件、静态文件和跟踪文件。(我通常也避免添加YAML关系锚。生命太短暂,没有时间去寻找循环。)
此外,如果速度和空间真的是一个问题,我都不用。你可能想看看BSON。
其他回答
由于这个问题现在在搜索YAML和JSON时非常突出,值得注意的是两者之间一个很少被引用的区别:许可证。JSON声称拥有一个JSON用户必须遵守的许可(包括法律上模棱两可的“应使用代表善,而不是恶”)。YAML没有这样的许可声明,这可能是一个重要的区别(对您的律师来说,如果不是对您来说)。
差异:
YAML, depending on how you use it, can be more readable than JSON JSON is often faster and is probably still interoperable with more systems It's possible to write a "good enough" JSON parser very quickly Duplicate keys, which are potentially valid JSON, are definitely invalid YAML. YAML has a ton of features, including comments and relational anchors. YAML syntax is accordingly quite complex, and can be hard to understand. It is possible to write recursive structures in yaml: {a: &b [*b]}, which will loop infinitely in some converters. Even with circular detection, a "yaml bomb" is still possible (see xml bomb). Because there are no references, it is impossible to serialize complex structures with object references in JSON. YAML serialization can therefore be more efficient. In some coding environments, the use of YAML can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
观察:
Python programmers are generally big fans of YAML, because of the use of indentation, rather than bracketed syntax, to indicate levels. Many programmers consider the attachment of "meaning" to indentation a poor choice. If the data format will be leaving an application's environment, parsed within a UI, or sent in a messaging layer, JSON might be a better choice. YAML can be used, directly, for complex tasks like grammar definitions, and is often a better choice than inventing a new language.
I find both YAML and JSON to be very effective. The only two things that really dictate when one is used over the other for me is one, what the language is used most popularly with. For example, if I'm using Java, Javascript, I'll use JSON. For Java, I'll use their own objects, which are pretty much JSON but lacking in some features, and convert it to JSON if I need to or make it in JSON in the first place. I do that because that's a common thing in Java and makes it easier for other Java developers to modify my code. The second thing is whether I'm using it for the program to remember attributes, or if the program is receiving instructions in the form of a config file, in this case I'll use YAML, because it's very easily human read, has nice looking syntax, and is very easy to modify, even if you have no idea how YAML works. Then, the program will read it and convert it to JSON, or whatever is preferred for that language. In the end, it honestly doesn't matter. Both JSON and YAML are easily read by any experienced programmer.
从技术上讲,YAML提供了比JSON多得多的东西(YAML v1.2是JSON的超集):
评论 锚和继承- 3个相同项目的例子: item1: &anchor_name 名称:测试 title:测试标题 第二条:* anchor_name item3: < <: * anchor_name #你可以添加额外的东西。 ...
大多数情况下,人们不会使用这些额外的功能,主要的区别是YAML使用缩进,而JSON使用括号。这使得YAML(对于训练有素的眼睛)更加简洁和可读。
选择哪一个?
YAML额外的特性和简洁的符号使它成为配置文件(非用户提供的文件)的好选择。 JSON有限的特性、广泛的支持和更快的解析使其成为互操作性和用户提供数据的绝佳选择。
有时候你不需要在两者之间做出选择。
例如,在围棋中,你可以同时拥有这两者:
type Person struct {
Name string `json:"name" yaml:"name"`
Age int `json:"age" yaml:"age"`
}