我在看Pluralsight关于React的课程,老师说道具不应该被改变。我现在正在读一篇关于道具vs.国家的文章(uberVU/react-guide),它说

道具和状态更改都会触发呈现更新。

文章后面说:

Props(属性的缩写)是组件的配置,如果可以的话,是它的选项。它们是从上面接收的,是不可变的。

所以道具可以改变,但它们应该是不可变的? 什么时候应该使用道具,什么时候应该使用状态? 如果你有一个React组件需要的数据,它应该通过道具或设置在React组件通过getInitialState?


当前回答

我们可以改变states的值但我们不能改变props的值,或者我们可以说props是不可变的而states是可变的

其他回答

React组件使用state来读取/写入内部变量,这些变量可以通过以下方式更改/突变:

this.setState({name: 'Lila'})

React props是一个特殊的对象,允许程序员从父组件中获取变量和方法到子组件中。

它有点像房子的门窗。道具也是不可变的子组件不能改变/更新他们。

当父组件更改道具时,有几个方法可以帮助监听。

Basically, props and state are two ways the component can know what and how to render. Which part of the application state belongs to state and which to some top-level store, is more related to your app design, than to how React works. The simplest way to decide, IMO, is to think, whether this particular piece of data is useful for application as a whole, or it's some local information. Also, it's important to not duplicate state, so if some piece of data can be calculated from props - it should calculated from props.

For example, let's say you have some dropdown control (which wraps standart HTML select for custom styling), which can a) select some value from list, and b) be opened or closed (i.e., the options list displayed or hidden). Now, let's say your app displays a list of items of some sort and your dropdown controls filter for list entries. Then, it would be best to pass active filter value as a prop, and keep opened/closed state local. Also, to make it functional, you would pass an onChange handler from parent component, which would be called inside dropdown element and send updated information (new selected filter) to the store immediately. On the other hand, opened/closed state can be kept inside dropdown component, because the rest of the application doesn't really care if the control is opened, until user actually changes it value.

下面的代码是不完全工作,它需要css和处理下拉单击/模糊/改变事件,但我想保持示例最小。希望这有助于理解其中的区别。

const _store = {
    items: [
    { id: 1, label: 'One' },
    { id: 2, label: 'Two' },
    { id: 3, label: 'Three', new: true },
    { id: 4, label: 'Four', new: true },
    { id: 5, label: 'Five', important: true },
    { id: 6, label: 'Six' },
    { id: 7, label: 'Seven', important: true },
    ],
  activeFilter: 'important',
  possibleFilters: [
    { key: 'all', label: 'All' },
    { key: 'new', label: 'New' },
    { key: 'important', label: 'Important' }
  ]
}

function getFilteredItems(items, filter) {
    switch (filter) {
    case 'all':
        return items;

    case 'new':
        return items.filter(function(item) { return Boolean(item.new); });

    case 'important':
        return items.filter(function(item) { return Boolean(item.important); });

    default:
        return items;
  }
}

const App = React.createClass({
  render: function() {
    return (
            <div>
            My list:

            <ItemList   items={this.props.listItems} />
          <div>
            <Dropdown 
              onFilterChange={function(e) {
                _store.activeFilter = e.currentTarget.value;
                console.log(_store); // in real life, some action would be dispatched here
              }}
              filterOptions={this.props.filterOptions}
              value={this.props.activeFilter}
              />
          </div>
        </div>
      );
  }
});

const ItemList = React.createClass({
  render: function() {
    return (
      <div>
        {this.props.items.map(function(item) {
          return <div key={item.id}>{item.id}: {item.label}</div>;
        })}
      </div>
    );
  }
});

const Dropdown = React.createClass({
    getInitialState: function() {
    return {
        isOpen: false
    };
  },

  render: function() {
    return (
        <div>
            <select 
            className="hidden-select" 
          onChange={this.props.onFilterChange}
          value={this.props.value}>
            {this.props.filterOptions.map(function(option) {
            return <option value={option.key} key={option.key}>{option.label}</option>
          })}
        </select>

        <div className={'custom-select' + (this.state.isOpen ? ' open' : '')} onClick={this.onClick}>
            <div className="selected-value">{this.props.activeFilter}</div>
          {this.props.filterOptions.map(function(option) {
            return <div data-value={option.key} key={option.key}>{option.label}</div>
          })}
        </div>
      </div>
    );
  },

  onClick: function(e) {
    this.setState({
        isOpen: !this.state.isOpen
    });
  }
});

ReactDOM.render(
  <App 
    listItems={getFilteredItems(_store.items, _store.activeFilter)} 
    filterOptions={_store.possibleFilters}
    activeFilter={_store.activeFilter}
    />,
  document.getElementById('root')
);

在React中,道具和状态之间有一些关键的区别。道具是不可变的——一旦设置好,就不能更改。另一方面,状态可以在任何时候改变。道具也从父组件传递给子组件,而状态是单个组件的局部状态。

用户在应用程序的某个地方输入了一些数据。

在其中输入数据的组件应该在其状态中拥有该数据,因为它需要在数据输入期间操作和更改它 在应用程序的其他任何地方,数据都应该作为道具传递给所有其他组件

所以,是的,道具是在变化的,但它们是从“源头”改变的,然后简单地从那里向下流动。所以道具在接收它们的组件的上下文中是不可变的。

例如,在一个参考数据屏幕上,用户编辑一个供应商列表将在状态下管理它,然后会有一个操作,导致更新的数据保存在ReferenceDataState中,它可能比AppState低一级,然后这个供应商列表将作为道具传递给所有需要使用它的组件。

亲子交流,只需传递道具即可。

使用state在控制器视图中存储当前页面所需的数据。

使用道具将数据和事件处理程序传递给你的子组件。

这些列表应该有助于指导您在组件中处理数据。

道具

是不可变的 它可以让React进行快速参考检查 用于从视图控制器向下传递数据 顶级组件 有更好的表现 使用它将数据传递给子组件

状态

是否应该在视图控制器中进行管理 顶级组件 是可变的 表现更差 不应该从子组件访问 用道具把它传下去

For communication between two components that don't have a parent-child relationship, you can set up your own global event system. Subscribe to events in componentDidMount(), unsubscribe in componentWillUnmount(), and call setState() when you receive an event. Flux pattern is one of the possible ways to arrange this. - https://facebook.github.io/react/tips/communicate-between-components.html What Components Should Have State? Most of your components should simply take some data from props and render it. However, sometimes you need to respond to user input, a server request or the passage of time. For this you use state. Try to keep as many of your components as possible stateless. By doing this you'll isolate the state to its most logical place and minimize redundancy, making it easier to reason about your application. A common pattern is to create several stateless components that just render data, and have a stateful component above them in the hierarchy that passes its state to its children via props. The stateful component encapsulates all of the interaction logic, while the stateless components take care of rendering data in a declarative way. - https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/interactivity-and-dynamic-uis.html#what-components-should-have-state What Should Go in State? State should contain data that a component's event handlers may change to trigger a UI update. In real apps this data tends to be very small and JSON-serializable. When building a stateful component, think about the minimal possible representation of its state, and only store those properties in this.state. Inside of render() simply compute any other information you need based on this state. You'll find that thinking about and writing applications in this way tends to lead to the most correct application, since adding redundant or computed values to state means that you need to explicitly keep them in sync rather than rely on React computing them for you. - https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/interactivity-and-dynamic-uis.html#what-should-go-in-state