在这里我提供了更多的方法，这些方法在很多方面看起来都更快:

选项1:Split string on。Or [Or] Or ' Or "，颠倒过来，跳过空项。

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var parts = path.split(/\[|\]|\.|'|"/g).reverse(), name; // (why reverse? because it's usually faster to pop off the end of an array)
    while (parts.length) { name=parts.pop(); if (name) origin=origin[name]; }
    return origin;
}

选项2(最快的，除了eval):低级字符扫描(没有regex/split/等等，只是一个快速字符扫描)。 注意:该命令不支持索引引用。

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var c = '', pc, i = 0, n = path.length, name = '';
    if (n) while (i<=n) ((c = path[i++]) == '.' || c == '[' || c == ']' || c == void 0) ? (name?(origin = origin[name], name = ''):(pc=='.'||pc=='['||pc==']'&&c==']'?i=n+2:void 0),pc=c) : name += c;
    if (i==n+2) throw "Invalid path: "+path;
    return origin;
} // (around 1,000,000+/- ops/sec)

选项3:(新:选项2扩展到支持引号-有点慢，但仍然很快)

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var c, pc, i = 0, n = path.length, name = '', q;
    while (i<=n)
        ((c = path[i++]) == '.' || c == '[' || c == ']' || c == "'" || c == '"' || c == void 0) ? (c==q&&path[i]==']'?q='':q?name+=c:name?(origin?origin=origin[name]:i=n+2,name='') : (pc=='['&&(c=='"'||c=="'")?q=c:pc=='.'||pc=='['||pc==']'&&c==']'||pc=='"'||pc=="'"?i=n+2:void 0), pc=c) : name += c;
    if (i==n+2 || name) throw "Invalid path: "+path;
    return origin;
}

JSPerf： http://jsperf.com/ways-to-dereference-a-delimited-property-string/3

"eval(...)" is still king though (performance wise that is). If you have property paths directly under your control, there shouldn't be any issues with using 'eval' (especially if speed is desired). If pulling property paths "over the wire" (on the line!? lol :P), then yes, use something else to be safe. Only an idiot would say to never use "eval" at all, as there ARE good reasons when to use it. Also, "It is used in Doug Crockford's JSON parser." If the input is safe, then no problems at all. Use the right tool for the right job, that's it.

这个解决方案怎么样:

setJsonValue: function (json, field, val) {
  if (field !== undefined){
    try {
      eval("json." + field + " = val");
    }
    catch(e){
      ;
    }
  }  
}

这个，用来得到:

getJsonValue: function (json, field){
  var value = undefined;
  if (field !== undefined) {
    try {
      eval("value = json." + field);
    } 
    catch(e){
      ;
    }
  }
  return value;
};

可能有些人会认为它们不安全，但它们解析字符串的速度肯定要快得多。

React示例-使用lodash

从性能角度来看，这可能不是最有效的方法，但如果你的应用是一个庞然大物，它肯定会为你节省一些时间。特别是当您将状态数据格式与API后端紧密耦合时。

   import set from "lodash/set";  // More efficient import

    class UserProfile extends Component {

      constructor(props){
        super(props);

        this.state = {
          user: {
            account: {
              id: "",
              email: "",
              first_name: ""
            }
          }
        }
      }

       /**
       * Updates the state based on the form input
       * 
       * @param {FormUpdate} event 
       */
      userAccountFormHook(event) {
        // https://lodash.com/docs#get
        // https://lodash.com/docs#set
        const { name, value } = event.target;
        let current_state = this.state
        set(current_state, name, value)  // Magic happens here
        this.setState(current_state);
      }

    render() {
        return (
          <CustomFormInput
            label: "First Name"
            type: "text"
            placeholder: "First Name"
            name: "user.account.first_name"
            onChange: {this.userAccountFormHook}
            value: {this.state.user.account.first_name}

          />
      )
  }
}

mohamed Hamouday' Answer的扩展将填补缺失的关键

function Object_Manager(obj, Path, value, Action, strict) 
{
    try
    {
        if(Array.isArray(Path) == false)
        {
            Path = [Path];
        }

        let level = 0;
        var Return_Value;
        Path.reduce((a, b)=>{
            console.log(level,':',a, '|||',b)
            if (!strict){
              if (!(b in a)) a[b] = {}
            }


            level++;
            if (level === Path.length)
            {
                if(Action === 'Set')
                {
                    a[b] = value;
                    return value;
                }
                else if(Action === 'Get')
                {
                    Return_Value = a[b];
                }
                else if(Action === 'Unset')
                {
                    delete a[b];
                }
            } 
            else 
            {
                return a[b];
            }
        }, obj);
        return Return_Value;
    }

    catch(err)
    {
        console.error(err);
        return obj;
    }
}

例子

obja = {
  "a": {
    "b":"nom"
  }
}

// Set
path = "c.b" // Path does not exist
Object_Manager(obja,path.split('.'), 'test_new_val', 'Set', false);

// Expected Output: Object { a: Object { b: "nom" }, c: Object { b: "test_new_value" } }

受到@webjay的回答的启发: https://stackoverflow.com/a/46008856/4110122

我做了这个函数，你可以用它来获取/设置/取消设置对象中的任何值

function Object_Manager(obj, Path, value, Action) 
{
    try
    {
        if(Array.isArray(Path) == false)
        {
            Path = [Path];
        }

        let level = 0;
        var Return_Value;
        Path.reduce((a, b)=>{
            level++;
            if (level === Path.length)
            {
                if(Action === 'Set')
                {
                    a[b] = value;
                    return value;
                }
                else if(Action === 'Get')
                {
                    Return_Value = a[b];
                }
                else if(Action === 'Unset')
                {
                    delete a[b];
                }
            } 
            else 
            {
                return a[b];
            }
        }, obj);
        return Return_Value;
    }

    catch(err)
    {
        console.error(err);
        return obj;
    }
}

使用它:

 // Set
 Object_Manager(Obj,[Level1,Level2,Level3],New_Value, 'Set');

 // Get
 Object_Manager(Obj,[Level1,Level2,Level3],'', 'Get');

 // Unset
 Object_Manager(Obj,[Level1,Level2,Level3],'', 'Unset');

这可能永远都不会曝光……但不管怎样，它在这里。

将[]括号语法替换为。 继续前进。字符 删除空白字符串 找到路径(否则未定义)

(为了找到一个对象的路径，使用这个pathTo解决方案。)

// "one liner" (ES6) const deep_value = (obj, path) => path .replace(/\[|\]\.?/g, '.') .split('.') .filter(s => s) .reduce((acc, val) => acc && acc[val], obj); // ... and that's it. var someObject = { 'part1' : { 'name': 'Part 1', 'size': '20', 'qty' : '50' }, 'part2' : { 'name': 'Part 2', 'size': '15', 'qty' : '60' }, 'part3' : [ { 'name': 'Part 3A', 'size': '10', 'qty' : '20' } // ... ], 'pa[rt3' : [ { 'name': 'Part 3A', 'size': '10', 'qty' : '20' } // ... ] }; console.log(deep_value(someObject, "part1.name")); // Part 1 console.log(deep_value(someObject, "part2.qty")); // 60 console.log(deep_value(someObject, "part3[0].name")); // Part 3A console.log(deep_value(someObject, "part3[0].....name")); // Part 3A - invalid blank paths removed console.log(deep_value(someObject, "pa[rt3[0].name")); // undefined - name does not support square brackets