如果javascript内置了名称空间，那就更好了，但我发现像Dustin Diaz在这里描述的那样组织东西对我有很大帮助。

var DED = (function() {

    var private_var;

    function private_method()
    {
        // do stuff here
    }

    return {
        method_1 : function()
            {
                // do stuff here
            },
        method_2 : function()
            {
                // do stuff here
            }
    };
})();

我把不同的“名称空间”放在不同的文件中，有时把单独的类放在不同的文件中。通常我从一个文件开始，当类或名称空间变得足够大时，我将它分离到自己的文件中。使用工具将所有文件组合起来进行生产也是一个很好的主意。

我认为这可能与DDD(领域驱动设计)有关。我正在开发的应用程序，虽然缺乏正式的API，但确实通过服务器端代码(类/文件名等)给出了提示。有了这些，我创建了一个顶级对象作为整个问题域的容器;然后，我在需要的地方添加名称空间:

var App;
(function()
{
    App = new Domain( 'test' );

    function Domain( id )
    {
        this.id = id;
        this.echo = function echo( s )
        {
            alert( s );
        }
        return this;
    }
})();

// separate file
(function(Domain)
{
    Domain.Console = new Console();

    function Console()
    {
        this.Log = function Log( s )
        {
            console.log( s );
        }
        return this;
    }
})(App);

// implementation
App.Console.Log('foo');

"Write like crazy and just hope it works out for the best?", I've seen a project like this which was developed and maintained by just 2 developers, a huge application with lots of javascript code. On top of that there were different shortcuts for every possible jquery function you can think of. I suggested they organize the code as plugins, as that is the jquery equivalent of class, module, namespace... and the whole universe. But things got much worse, now they started writing plugins replacing every combination of 3 lines of code used in the project. Personaly I think jQuery is the devil and it shouldn't be used on projects with lots of javascript because it encourages you to be lazy and not think of organizing code in any way. I'd rather read 100 lines of javascript than one line with 40 chained jQuery functions (I'm not kidding). Contrary to popular belief it's very easy to organize javascript code in equivalents to namespaces and classes. That's what YUI and Dojo do. You can easily roll your own if you like. I find YUI's approach much better and efficient. But you usualy need a nice editor with support for snippets to compensate for YUI naming conventions if you want to write anything useful.

代码组织要求采用约定和文档标准: 1. 物理文件的命名空间代码;

Exc = {};

2. 在这些命名空间javascript中分组类; 3.设置原型或相关的函数或类来表示真实世界的对象;

Exc = {};
Exc.ui = {};
Exc.ui.maskedInput = function (mask) {
    this.mask = mask;
    ...
};
Exc.ui.domTips = function (dom, tips) {
    this.dom = gift;
    this.tips = tips;
    ...
};

4. 设置约定以改进代码。例如，将其所有内部函数或方法分组在对象类型的class属性中。

Exc.ui.domTips = function (dom, tips) {
    this.dom = gift;
    this.tips = tips;
    this.internal = {
        widthEstimates: function (tips) {
            ...
        }
        formatTips: function () {
            ...
        }
    };
    ...
};

5. 制作名称空间、类、方法和变量的文档。必要时也讨论一些代码(一些fi和for，它们通常实现代码的重要逻辑)。

/**
  * Namespace <i> Example </i> created to group other namespaces of the "Example".  
  */
Exc = {};
/**
  * Namespace <i> ui </i> created with the aim of grouping namespaces user interface.
  */
Exc.ui = {};

/**
  * Class <i> maskdInput </i> used to add an input HTML formatting capabilities and validation of data and information.
  * @ Param {String} mask - mask validation of input data.
  */
Exc.ui.maskedInput = function (mask) {
    this.mask = mask;
    ...
};

/**
  * Class <i> domTips </i> used to add an HTML element the ability to present tips and information about its function or rule input etc..
  * @ Param {String} id - id of the HTML element.
  * @ Param {String} tips - tips on the element that will appear when the mouse is over the element whose identifier is id <i> </i>.
  */
  Exc.ui.domTips = function (id, tips) {
    this.domID = id;
    this.tips = tips;
    ...
};

这些只是一些技巧，但这对组织代码有很大帮助。记住，你必须自律才能成功!

看看JavasciptMVC吧。

你可以:

将代码分成模型层、视图层和控制器层。 将所有代码压缩到一个生产文件中 自动生成代码 创建并运行单元测试 还有更多……

最重要的是，它使用jQuery，所以你也可以利用其他jQuery插件。

您可以将脚本分解为单独的文件进行开发，然后创建一个“发布”版本，在这个版本中，您可以将它们全部塞在一起，并在上面运行YUI Compressor或类似的程序。