随着像jQuery这样的JavaScript框架使客户端web应用程序更丰富,功能更强大,我开始注意到一个问题…

你到底是怎么组织起来的?

把所有的处理程序放在一个地方,并为所有事件编写函数? 创建函数/类来包装您的所有功能? 疯狂地写作,只希望结果是最好的? 放弃,找一份新工作?

我提到了jQuery,但它实际上是一般的JavaScript代码。我发现,当一行一行开始堆积时,管理脚本文件或找到您要找的内容变得越来越困难。我发现的最大问题可能是,做同一件事有太多的方法,很难知道哪一种是目前普遍接受的最佳实践。

有什么通用的建议可以让你的.js文件像你的应用程序的其他部分一样漂亮整洁吗?或者这只是IDE的问题?还有更好的选择吗?


EDIT

这个问题主要是关于代码组织,而不是文件组织。有一些合并文件或拆分内容的好例子。

我的问题是:目前普遍接受的组织实际代码的最佳实践方式是什么?您的方法是什么,甚至推荐的方法是什么,以与页面元素交互并创建互不冲突的可重用代码?

有些人列出了名称空间,这是个好主意。还有什么其他方法,更具体地说,处理页面上的元素并保持代码的组织和整洁?


当前回答

如果javascript内置了名称空间,那就更好了,但我发现像Dustin Diaz在这里描述的那样组织东西对我有很大帮助。

var DED = (function() {

    var private_var;

    function private_method()
    {
        // do stuff here
    }

    return {
        method_1 : function()
            {
                // do stuff here
            },
        method_2 : function()
            {
                // do stuff here
            }
    };
})();

我把不同的“名称空间”放在不同的文件中,有时把单独的类放在不同的文件中。通常我从一个文件开始,当类或名称空间变得足够大时,我将它分离到自己的文件中。使用工具将所有文件组合起来进行生产也是一个很好的主意。

其他回答

Dojo从一开始就使用模块系统。事实上,它被认为是Dojo的基石,是将所有Dojo结合在一起的粘合剂:

dojo。要求——官方文件。 理解dojo.declare, dojo。Require和dojo. provider。 引入Dojo。

使用模块Dojo可以实现以下目标:

Namespaces for Dojo code and custom code (dojo.declare()) — do not pollute the global space, coexist with other libraries, and user's non-Dojo-aware code. Loading modules synchronously or asynchronously by name (dojo.require()). Custom builds by analyzing module dependencies to create a single file or a group of interdependent files (so-called layers) to include only what your web application needs. Custom builds can include Dojo modules and customer-supplied modules as well. Transparent CDN-based access to Dojo and user's code. Both AOL and Google carry Dojo in this fashion, but some customers do that for their custom web applications as well.

代码组织要求采用约定和文档标准: 1. 物理文件的命名空间代码;

Exc = {};

2. 在这些命名空间javascript中分组类; 3.设置原型或相关的函数或类来表示真实世界的对象;

Exc = {};
Exc.ui = {};
Exc.ui.maskedInput = function (mask) {
    this.mask = mask;
    ...
};
Exc.ui.domTips = function (dom, tips) {
    this.dom = gift;
    this.tips = tips;
    ...
};

4. 设置约定以改进代码。例如,将其所有内部函数或方法分组在对象类型的class属性中。

Exc.ui.domTips = function (dom, tips) {
    this.dom = gift;
    this.tips = tips;
    this.internal = {
        widthEstimates: function (tips) {
            ...
        }
        formatTips: function () {
            ...
        }
    };
    ...
};

5. 制作名称空间、类、方法和变量的文档。必要时也讨论一些代码(一些fi和for,它们通常实现代码的重要逻辑)。

/**
  * Namespace <i> Example </i> created to group other namespaces of the "Example".  
  */
Exc = {};
/**
  * Namespace <i> ui </i> created with the aim of grouping namespaces user interface.
  */
Exc.ui = {};

/**
  * Class <i> maskdInput </i> used to add an input HTML formatting capabilities and validation of data and information.
  * @ Param {String} mask - mask validation of input data.
  */
Exc.ui.maskedInput = function (mask) {
    this.mask = mask;
    ...
};

/**
  * Class <i> domTips </i> used to add an HTML element the ability to present tips and information about its function or rule input etc..
  * @ Param {String} id - id of the HTML element.
  * @ Param {String} tips - tips on the element that will appear when the mouse is over the element whose identifier is id <i> </i>.
  */
  Exc.ui.domTips = function (id, tips) {
    this.domID = id;
    this.tips = tips;
    ...
};

这些只是一些技巧,但这对组织代码有很大帮助。记住,你必须自律才能成功!

"Write like crazy and just hope it works out for the best?", I've seen a project like this which was developed and maintained by just 2 developers, a huge application with lots of javascript code. On top of that there were different shortcuts for every possible jquery function you can think of. I suggested they organize the code as plugins, as that is the jquery equivalent of class, module, namespace... and the whole universe. But things got much worse, now they started writing plugins replacing every combination of 3 lines of code used in the project. Personaly I think jQuery is the devil and it shouldn't be used on projects with lots of javascript because it encourages you to be lazy and not think of organizing code in any way. I'd rather read 100 lines of javascript than one line with 40 chained jQuery functions (I'm not kidding). Contrary to popular belief it's very easy to organize javascript code in equivalents to namespaces and classes. That's what YUI and Dojo do. You can easily roll your own if you like. I find YUI's approach much better and efficient. But you usualy need a nice editor with support for snippets to compensate for YUI naming conventions if you want to write anything useful.

以Jquery为中心的命名空间方式组织您的代码可能看起来如下…并且不会与其他Javascript API(如Prototype, Ext)冲突。

<script src="jquery/1.3.2/jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">

var AcmeJQ = jQuery.noConflict(true);
var Acme = {fn: function(){}};

(function($){

    Acme.sayHi = function()
    {
        console.log('Hello');
    };

    Acme.sayBye = function()
    {
        console.log('Good Bye');
    };
})(AcmeJQ);

// Usage
//          Acme.sayHi();
// or
// <a href="#" onclick="Acme.sayHi();">Say Hello</a>


</script>

希望这能有所帮助。

我使用Dojo的包管理(Dojo。Require和dojo. provider)和类系统(dojo.declare,它还允许简单的多重继承)将我所有的类/小部件模块化到单独的文件中。这不仅能让你的代码保持有序,而且还能让你对类/小部件进行惰性/及时加载。