其他几点可能有助于理解本地存储和会话存储之间的区别

Both local storage and session storage are scoped to document origin, so https://mydomain.example/ http://mydomain.example/ https://mydomain.example:8080/ All of the above URL's will not share the same storage. (Notice path of the web page does not affect the web storage) Session storage is different even for the document with same origin policy open in different tabs, so same web page open in two different tabs cannot share the same session storage. Both local and session storage are also scoped by browser vendors. So storage data saved by IE cannot be read by Chrome or FF.

sessionStorage与localStorage相同，只是它只存储一个会话的数据，并且当用户关闭创建它的浏览器窗口时，它将被删除。

The only difference is that localStorage has a different expiration time, sessionStorage will only be accessible while and by the window that created it is open. localStorage lasts until you delete it or the user deletes it. Lets say that you wanted to save a login username and password you would want to use sessionStorageover localStorage for security reasons (ie. another person accessing their account at a later time). But if you wanted to save a user's settings on their machine you would probably want localStorage. All in all:

localStorage—用于长期使用。 sessionStorage—当您需要存储更改的东西或临时的东西时使用

性能方面，我的(粗略的)测量在1000次写入和读取时没有发现差异

安全方面，从直觉上看，localStore可能会在sessionStore之前关闭，但没有具体的证据-也许其他人会?

功能方面，与digitalFresh一致

sessionStorage为每个给定的源维护一个单独的存储区域，该存储区域在页面会话期间可用(只要浏览器打开，包括页面重新加载和恢复)。 localStorage做同样的事情，但是即使浏览器关闭并重新打开，它仍然存在。

我从Web存储API中获得了这个

在我看来，会话存储相对于本地存储的优势在于，它在Firefox中具有无限的容量，并且不会持续比会话更长的时间。(当然这取决于你的目标是什么。)