如果你正在为MOSS编写代码，你以这种方式获得一个站点引用:

SPSite oSiteCollection = SPContext.Current.Site;

之后在你的代码中你说:

oSiteCollection.Dispose();

从MSDN:

If you create an SPSite object, you can use the Dispose method to close the object. However, if you have a reference to a shared resource, such as when the object is provided by the GetContextSite method or Site property (for example, SPContext.Current.Site), do not use the Dispose method to close the object, but instead allow Windows SharePoint Services or your portal application to manage the object. For more information about object disposal, see Best Practices: Using Disposable Windows SharePoint Services Objects.

每个MOSS程序员都会遇到这种情况。

前几天我看到了这个帖子，我觉得它很晦涩，对那些不知道的人来说很痛苦

int x = 0;
x = x++;
return x;

因为这将返回0，而不是大多数人期望的1

合同在流。阅读是我见过很多人被绊倒的东西:

// Read 8 bytes and turn them into a ulong
byte[] data = new byte[8];
stream.Read(data, 0, 8); // <-- WRONG!
ulong data = BitConverter.ToUInt64(data);

这是错误的原因是流。Read最多读取指定的字节数，但完全可以只读取1个字节，即使在流结束前还有7个字节可用。

它看起来与Stream如此相似，这并没有什么帮助。如果没有异常返回，则保证已写入所有字节。上面的代码几乎一直都能工作，这也没有什么帮助。当然，没有现成的、方便的方法来正确地读取N个字节也无济于事。

所以，为了堵住这个漏洞，提高人们的意识，这里有一个正确的方法:

    /// <summary>
    /// Attempts to fill the buffer with the specified number of bytes from the
    /// stream. If there are fewer bytes left in the stream than requested then
    /// all available bytes will be read into the buffer.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="stream">Stream to read from.</param>
    /// <param name="buffer">Buffer to write the bytes to.</param>
    /// <param name="offset">Offset at which to write the first byte read from
    ///                      the stream.</param>
    /// <param name="length">Number of bytes to read from the stream.</param>
    /// <returns>Number of bytes read from the stream into buffer. This may be
    ///          less than requested, but only if the stream ended before the
    ///          required number of bytes were read.</returns>
    public static int FillBuffer(this Stream stream,
                                 byte[] buffer, int offset, int length)
    {
        int totalRead = 0;
        while (length > 0)
        {
            var read = stream.Read(buffer, offset, length);
            if (read == 0)
                return totalRead;
            offset += read;
            length -= read;
            totalRead += read;
        }
        return totalRead;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Attempts to read the specified number of bytes from the stream. If
    /// there are fewer bytes left before the end of the stream, a shorter
    /// (possibly empty) array is returned.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="stream">Stream to read from.</param>
    /// <param name="length">Number of bytes to read from the stream.</param>
    public static byte[] Read(this Stream stream, int length)
    {
        byte[] buf = new byte[length];
        int read = stream.FillBuffer(buf, 0, length);
        if (read < length)
            Array.Resize(ref buf, read);
        return buf;
    }

不是最糟糕的，但还没被提起。工厂方法作为参数传递给System.Collections.Concurrent方法可以被多次调用，即使只使用了一个返回值。考虑到. net在线程原语中多么强烈地试图保护您不受虚假唤醒的影响，这可能会让您感到惊讶。

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Collections.Concurrent;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;

namespace ValueFactoryBehavingBadlyExample
{
    class Program
    {
        static ConcurrentDictionary<int, int> m_Dict = new ConcurrentDictionary<int, int>();
        static ManualResetEventSlim m_MRES = new ManualResetEventSlim(false);
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
            {
                Task.Factory.StartNew(ThreadGate, TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning);
            }
            Thread.Sleep(1000);
            m_MRES.Set();
            Thread.Sleep(1000);
            Console.WriteLine("Dictionary Size: " + m_Dict.Count);
            Console.Read();
        }

        static void ThreadGate()
        {
            m_MRES.Wait();
            int value = m_Dict.GetOrAdd(0, ValueFactory);
        }

        static int ValueFactory(int key)
        {
            Thread.Sleep(1000);
            Console.WriteLine("Value Factory Called");
            return key;
        }
    }
}

(可能)输出:

Value Factory Called
Value Factory Called
Value Factory Called
Value Factory Called
Dictionary Size: 0
Value Factory Called
Value Factory Called
Value Factory Called
Value Factory Called

内存泄漏，因为您没有取消关联事件。

这甚至让我认识的一些高级开发人员被发现了。

想象一个WPF表单，里面有很多东西，你在其中的某个地方订阅了一个事件。如果您不取消订阅，那么关闭和取消引用后，整个表单将保留在内存中。

我相信我看到的问题是在WPF表单中创建一个DispatchTimer并订阅Tick事件，如果你不对计时器做-=，你的表单泄漏内存!

在本例中，您的拆卸代码应该具有

timer.Tick -= TimerTickEventHandler;

这一点特别棘手，因为您在WPF表单中创建了DispatchTimer实例，所以您会认为它是一个由垃圾收集进程处理的内部引用……不幸的是，DispatchTimer在UI线程上使用了一个静态的订阅和服务请求的内部列表，所以引用是由静态类“拥有”的。

LINQ to SQL和一对多关系

这是一个可爱的，咬了我几次，微软把它留给他们自己的开发人员放在她的博客。我不能说得比她更好，来看看。