在解析字符串之前,如何检查它是否是一个数字?


当前回答

这通常是通过一个简单的用户定义函数来完成的(例如,roll your-own的“isNumeric”函数)。

喜欢的东西:

public static boolean isNumeric(String str) { 
  try {  
    Double.parseDouble(str);  
    return true;
  } catch(NumberFormatException e){  
    return false;  
  }  
}

然而,如果您经常调用这个函数,并且由于不是一个数字,您希望许多检查失败,那么这种机制的性能就不会很好,因为您依赖于每次失败都会抛出异常,这是一个相当昂贵的操作。

另一种方法可能是使用正则表达式来检查是否是一个数字:

public static boolean isNumeric(String str) {
  return str.matches("-?\\d+(\\.\\d+)?");  //match a number with optional '-' and decimal.
}

但是要小心上面的RegEx机制,因为如果你使用非阿拉伯数字(即0到9以外的数字),它会失败。这是因为RegEx的“\d”部分只匹配[0-9],并且有效地不具有国际数字意识。(感谢OregonGhost指出这一点!)

甚至另一种替代方法是使用Java内置的Java .text. numberformat对象来查看解析字符串后解析器的位置是否位于字符串的末尾。如果是,我们可以假设整个字符串都是数字:

public static boolean isNumeric(String str) {
  ParsePosition pos = new ParsePosition(0);
  NumberFormat.getInstance().parse(str, pos);
  return str.length() == pos.getIndex();
}

其他回答

这是我对这个问题的回答。

一个方便的方法,你可以使用任何类型的解析器来解析任何字符串:isParsable(对象解析器,字符串str)。解析器可以是Class或对象。这也将允许你使用你写的自定义解析器,应该适用于任何场景,例如:

isParsable(Integer.class, "11");
isParsable(Double.class, "11.11");
Object dateFormater = new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("yyyy.MM.dd G 'at' HH:mm:ss z");
isParsable(dateFormater, "2001.07.04 AD at 12:08:56 PDT");

下面是我的代码和方法描述。

import java.lang.reflect.*;

/**
 * METHOD: isParsable<p><p>
 * 
 * This method will look through the methods of the specified <code>from</code> parameter
 * looking for a public method name starting with "parse" which has only one String
 * parameter.<p>
 * 
 * The <code>parser</code> parameter can be a class or an instantiated object, eg:
 * <code>Integer.class</code> or <code>new Integer(1)</code>. If you use a
 * <code>Class</code> type then only static methods are considered.<p>
 * 
 * When looping through potential methods, it first looks at the <code>Class</code> associated
 * with the <code>parser</code> parameter, then looks through the methods of the parent's class
 * followed by subsequent ancestors, using the first method that matches the criteria specified
 * above.<p>
 * 
 * This method will hide any normal parse exceptions, but throws any exceptions due to
 * programmatic errors, eg: NullPointerExceptions, etc. If you specify a <code>parser</code>
 * parameter which has no matching parse methods, a NoSuchMethodException will be thrown
 * embedded within a RuntimeException.<p><p>
 * 
 * Example:<br>
 * <code>isParsable(Boolean.class, "true");<br>
 * isParsable(Integer.class, "11");<br>
 * isParsable(Double.class, "11.11");<br>
 * Object dateFormater = new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("yyyy.MM.dd G 'at' HH:mm:ss z");<br>
 * isParsable(dateFormater, "2001.07.04 AD at 12:08:56 PDT");<br></code>
 * <p>
 * 
 * @param parser    The Class type or instantiated Object to find a parse method in.
 * @param str   The String you want to parse
 * 
 * @return true if a parse method was found and completed without exception
 * @throws java.lang.NoSuchMethodException If no such method is accessible 
 */
public static boolean isParsable(Object parser, String str) {
    Class theClass = (parser instanceof Class? (Class)parser: parser.getClass());
    boolean staticOnly = (parser == theClass), foundAtLeastOne = false;
    Method[] methods = theClass.getMethods();

    // Loop over methods
    for (int index = 0; index < methods.length; index++) {
        Method method = methods[index];

        // If method starts with parse, is public and has one String parameter.
        // If the parser parameter was a Class, then also ensure the method is static. 
        if(method.getName().startsWith("parse") &&
            (!staticOnly || Modifier.isStatic(method.getModifiers())) &&
            Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers()) &&
            method.getGenericParameterTypes().length == 1 &&
            method.getGenericParameterTypes()[0] == String.class)
        {
            try {
                foundAtLeastOne = true;
                method.invoke(parser, str);
                return true; // Successfully parsed without exception
            } catch (Exception exception) {
                // If invoke problem, try a different method
                /*if(!(exception instanceof IllegalArgumentException) &&
                   !(exception instanceof IllegalAccessException) &&
                   !(exception instanceof InvocationTargetException))
                        continue; // Look for other parse methods*/

                // Parse method refuses to parse, look for another different method
                continue; // Look for other parse methods
            }
        }
    }

    // No more accessible parse method could be found.
    if(foundAtLeastOne) return false;
    else throw new RuntimeException(new NoSuchMethodException());
}


/**
 * METHOD: willParse<p><p>
 * 
 * A convienence method which calls the isParseable method, but does not throw any exceptions
 * which could be thrown through programatic errors.<p>
 * 
 * Use of {@link #isParseable(Object, String) isParseable} is recommended for use so programatic
 * errors can be caught in development, unless the value of the <code>parser</code> parameter is
 * unpredictable, or normal programtic exceptions should be ignored.<p>
 * 
 * See {@link #isParseable(Object, String) isParseable} for full description of method
 * usability.<p>
 * 
 * @param parser    The Class type or instantiated Object to find a parse method in.
 * @param str   The String you want to parse
 * 
 * @return true if a parse method was found and completed without exception
 * @see #isParseable(Object, String) for full description of method usability 
 */
public static boolean willParse(Object parser, String str) {
    try {
        return isParsable(parser, str);
    } catch(Throwable exception) {
        return false;
    }
}

这就是为什么我喜欢。net中的Try*方法。除了像Java一样的传统Parse方法之外,还有一个TryParse方法。我不擅长Java语法(输出参数?),所以请将以下内容视为某种伪代码。但它应该让概念变得清晰。

boolean parseInteger(String s, out int number)
{
    try {
        number = Integer.parseInt(myString);
        return true;
    } catch(NumberFormatException e) {
        return false;
    }
}

用法:

int num;
if (parseInteger("23", out num)) {
    // Do something with num.
}

这是一个简单的检查示例:

public static boolean isNumericString(String input) {
    boolean result = false;

    if(input != null && input.length() > 0) {
        char[] charArray = input.toCharArray();

        for(char c : charArray) {
            if(c >= '0' && c <= '9') {
                // it is a digit
                result = true;
            } else {
                result = false;
                break;
            }
        }
    }

    return result;
}

不要使用异常来验证你的值。 使用Util库代替apache NumberUtils:

NumberUtils.isNumber(myStringValue);

编辑:

请注意,如果字符串以0开头,NumberUtils将把您的值解释为十六进制。

NumberUtils.isNumber("07") //true
NumberUtils.isNumber("08") //false

正如@CraigTP在他的精彩回答中提到的,我也有类似的性能问题,使用exception来测试字符串是否是数值。因此,我最终分割字符串并使用java.lang.Character.isDigit()。

public static boolean isNumeric(String str)
{
    for (char c : str.toCharArray())
    {
        if (!Character.isDigit(c)) return false;
    }
    return true;
}

根据Javadoc, Character.isDigit(char)将正确识别非拉丁数字。在性能方面,我认为简单的N次比较(其中N是字符串中的字符数)在计算上比正则表达式匹配更有效。

更新:正如Jean-François Corbett在评论中指出的那样,上面的代码只验证正整数,这涵盖了我的大部分用例。下面是更新后的代码,它根据系统中使用的默认区域设置正确验证十进制数,假设十进制分隔符只在字符串中出现一次。

public static boolean isStringNumeric( String str )
{
    DecimalFormatSymbols currentLocaleSymbols = DecimalFormatSymbols.getInstance();
    char localeMinusSign = currentLocaleSymbols.getMinusSign();

    if ( !Character.isDigit( str.charAt( 0 ) ) && str.charAt( 0 ) != localeMinusSign ) return false;

    boolean isDecimalSeparatorFound = false;
    char localeDecimalSeparator = currentLocaleSymbols.getDecimalSeparator();

    for ( char c : str.substring( 1 ).toCharArray() )
    {
        if ( !Character.isDigit( c ) )
        {
            if ( c == localeDecimalSeparator && !isDecimalSeparatorFound )
            {
                isDecimalSeparatorFound = true;
                continue;
            }
            return false;
        }
    }
    return true;
}