我同意这里可能有漏洞。我已经修改了添加对象>setter的实现，以正确地追加到NSMutableOrderedSet。 - (void)addSubitemsObject:(SubItem *)value { NSMutableOrderedSet* tempSet = [NSMutableOrderedSet orderedSetWithOrderedSet:self.subitems]; [tempSet addObject:价值); 自我。subitems = tempSet; ｝ 将集合重新分配给self。子项将确保发送will /DidChangeValue通知>。

leell，你确定在这样的自定义设置NSMutableOrderedSet值存储在该集将被CoreData正确地保存到数据库吗?我没有检查，但它看起来像CoreData对NSOrderedSet一无所知，并期望NSSet作为多关系容器。

就我个人而言，我刚刚用@Stephan在另一个解决方案中概述的方法直接调用替换了对CoreData生成方法的调用:

NSMutableOrderedSet* tempSet = [self mutableOrderedSetValueForKey:@"subitems"];
      [tempSet addObject:value];
[tempSet addObject:value];

这消除了对类别的需求，当错误修复后，这些类别可能与苹果的解决方案和生成的代码发生冲突。

这有一个额外的好处，就是它是官方的方式!

相反，我建议使用NSObject中的访问器来访问关系的NSMutableOrderedSet。

- (void)addSubitemsObject:(SubItem *)value {
      NSMutableOrderedSet* tempSet = [self mutableOrderedSetValueForKey:@"subitems"];
      [tempSet addObject:value];
 }

例如，iOS v5.0的核心数据发布说明参考了这一点。

在一个简短的测试中，它在我的应用程序中工作。

我发现使用LeeIII的方法是有效的，但在分析时发现它非常慢。解析1000个条目花了15秒。注释出代码以添加关系将15秒变成2秒。

我的解决方案(更快，但更丑陋)包括创建一个临时可变数组，然后在所有解析完成后将其复制到有序集中。(如果您要添加许多关系，这只是性能上的优势)。

@property (nonatomic, retain) NSMutableArray* tempItems;
 ....
@synthesize tempItems = _tempItems;
 ....

- (void) addItemsObject:(KDItem *)value 
{
    if (!_tempItems) {
        self.tempItems = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:500];
    }
    [_tempItems addObject:value];
}

// Call this when you have added all the relationships
- (void) commitRelationships 
{
    if (_tempItems) {
        self.items = [NSOrderedSet orderedSetWithArray:self.tempItems];
        self.tempItems = nil;
    }
}

我希望这能帮助到其他人!

苹果文档To Many Relations说:你应该访问代理可变集或有序集使用

NSMutableOrderedSet * set = [managedObject mutableOrderedSetValueForKey:@"toManyRelation"];

修改此集合将添加或删除与托管对象的关系。使用[]或访问器访问可变有序集。符号是错误的，会失败。

我已经找到窃听器了。它发生在willChangeValueForKey:withSetMutation:usingObjects:中。

这个呼叫会触发一连串的通知，可能很难追踪，当然，一个回复者的变化可能会影响到另一个，我怀疑这就是为什么苹果什么都没做的原因。

然而，这在Set中是可以的，只有OrderedSet上的Set操作会发生故障。这意味着只有四个方法需要修改。因此，我所做的只是将Set操作转换为等效的Array操作。这些工作非常完美，开销最小(但必要)。

On a critical level, this solution does suffer from one critical flaw; if you are adding objects and one of the objects already exists, then it is either not added or moved to the back of the ordered list (I don't know which). In either case, the expected ordered index of the object by the time we arrive at didChange is different from what was anticipated. This may break some people's apps, but it doesn't affect mine, since I am only ever adding new objects or I confirm their final locations before I add them.

- (void)addChildrenObject:(BAFinancialItem *)value {
    if ([self.children containsObject:value]) {
        return;
    }
    NSIndexSet * indexSet = [NSIndexSet indexSetWithIndex:self.children.count];
    [self willChange:NSKeyValueChangeInsertion valuesAtIndexes:indexSet forKey:ChildrenKey];
    [[self primitiveValueForKey:ChildrenKey] addObject:value];
    [self didChange:NSKeyValueChangeInsertion valuesAtIndexes:indexSet forKey:ChildrenKey];
}

- (void)removeChildrenObject:(BAFinancialItem *)value {
    if (![self.children containsObject:value]) {
        return;
    }
    NSIndexSet * indexSet = [NSIndexSet indexSetWithIndex:[self.children indexOfObject:value]];
    [self willChange:NSKeyValueChangeRemoval valuesAtIndexes:indexSet forKey:ChildrenKey];
    [[self primitiveValueForKey:ChildrenKey] removeObject:value];
    [self didChange:NSKeyValueChangeRemoval valuesAtIndexes:indexSet forKey:ChildrenKey];
}

- (void)addChildren:(NSOrderedSet *)values {
    if ([values isSubsetOfOrderedSet:self.children]) {
        return;
    }
    NSIndexSet * indexSet = [NSIndexSet indexSetWithIndexesInRange:NSMakeRange(self.children.count, values.count)];
    [self willChange:NSKeyValueChangeInsertion valuesAtIndexes:indexSet forKey:ChildrenKey];
    [[self primitiveValueForKey:ChildrenKey] unionOrderedSet:values];
    [self didChange:NSKeyValueChangeInsertion valuesAtIndexes:indexSet forKey:ChildrenKey];
}

- (void)removeChildren:(NSOrderedSet *)values {
    if (![self.children intersectsOrderedSet:values]) {
        return;
    }
    NSIndexSet * indexSet = [self.children indexesOfObjectsPassingTest:^BOOL(id obj, NSUInteger idx, BOOL *stop) {
        return [values containsObject:obj];
    }];
    [self willChange:NSKeyValueChangeRemoval valuesAtIndexes:indexSet forKey:ChildrenKey];
    [[self primitiveValueForKey:ChildrenKey] minusOrderedSet:values];
    [self didChange:NSKeyValueChangeRemoval valuesAtIndexes:indexSet forKey:ChildrenKey];
}

当然，还有一个更简单的解决方案。内容如下;

- (void)addChildrenObject:(BAFinancialItem *)value {
    if ([self.children containsObject:value]) {
        return;
    }
    [self insertObject:value inChildrenAtIndex:self.children.count];
}

- (void)removeChildrenObject:(BAFinancialItem *)value {
    if (![self.children containsObject:value]) {
        return;
    }
    [self removeObjectFromChildrenAtIndex:[self.children indexOfObject:value]];
}

- (void)addChildren:(NSOrderedSet *)values {
    if ([values isSubsetOfOrderedSet:self.children]) {
        return;
    }
    [self insertChildren:values atIndexes:[NSIndexSet indexSetWithIndexesInRange:NSMakeRange(self.children.count, values.count)]];
}

- (void)removeChildren:(NSOrderedSet *)values {
    if (![self.children intersectsOrderedSet:values]) {
        return;
    }
    [self removeChildrenAtIndexes:[self.children indexesOfObjectsPassingTest:^BOOL(id obj, NSUInteger idx, BOOL *stop) {
        return [values containsObject:obj];
    }]];
}