这是我在Android上使用Proguard所做的:

public enum SomeStatus {
    UNINITIALIZED, STATUS_1, RESERVED_1, STATUS_2, RESERVED_2, STATUS_3;//do not change order

    private static SomeStatus[] values = null;
    public static SomeStatus fromInteger(int i) {
        if(SomeStatus.values == null) {
            SomeStatus.values = SomeStatus.values();
        }
        if (i < 0) return SomeStatus.values[0];
        if (i >= SomeStatus.values.length) return SomeStatus.values[0];
        return SomeStatus.values[i];
    }
}

它很短，我不需要担心在Proguard有一个异常

这就是我用的。我并不是说它远不如上面那些简单的解决方案“有效”。当在上面的解决方案中使用无效序数值时，它所做的是提供比"ArrayIndexOutOfBounds"更清晰的异常消息。

它利用了EnumSet javadoc指定迭代器以自然顺序返回元素的事实。如果不正确，就有一个断言。

JUnit4测试演示了如何使用它。

 /**
 * convert ordinal to Enum
 * @param clzz may not be null
 * @param ordinal
 * @return e with e.ordinal( ) == ordinal
 * @throws IllegalArgumentException if ordinal out of range
 */
public static <E extends Enum<E> > E lookupEnum(Class<E> clzz, int ordinal) {
    EnumSet<E> set = EnumSet.allOf(clzz);
    if (ordinal < set.size()) {
        Iterator<E> iter = set.iterator();
        for (int i = 0; i < ordinal; i++) {
            iter.next();
        }
        E rval = iter.next();
        assert(rval.ordinal() == ordinal);
        return rval;
    }
    throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid value " + ordinal + " for " + clzz.getName( ) + ", must be < " + set.size());
}

@Test
public void lookupTest( ) {
    java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit tu = lookupEnum(TimeUnit.class, 3);
    System.out.println(tu);
}

通过这种方式，您可以不依赖于编译时泛型解析(因此您可以随时创建枚举类实例，即使是使用class . formame创建的类型)

public Object getInstance(Class enumClazz, int ordinal) throws Exception {
    Object[] allEnums = enumClazz.getDeclaredMethod("values", Object[].class).invoke(null, null);
    return allEnums[ordinal];
}

public enum Suit implements java.io.Serializable, Comparable<Suit>{
  spades, hearts, diamonds, clubs;
  private static final Suit [] lookup  = Suit.values();
  public Suit fromOrdinal(int ordinal) {
    if(ordinal< 1 || ordinal> 3) return null;
    return lookup[value-1];
  }
}

测试类

public class MainTest {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Suit d3 = Suit.diamonds;
        Suit d3Test = Suit.fromOrdinal(2);
        if(d3.equals(d3Test)){
            System.out.println("Susses");
        }else System.out.println("Fails");
    }
}

我很感激你与我们分享，如果你有一个更有效的代码，我的enum是巨大的，不断调用数千次。

So one way is to doExampleEnum valueOfOrdinal = ExampleEnum.values()[ordinal]; which works and its easy, however, as mentioned before, ExampleEnum.values() returns a new cloned array for every call. That can be unnecessarily expensive. We can solve that by caching the array like so ExampleEnum[] values = values(). It is also "dangerous" to allow our cached array to be modified. Someone could write ExampleEnum.values[0] = ExampleEnum.type2; So I would make it private with an accessor method that does not do extra copying.

private enum ExampleEnum{
    type0, type1, type2, type3;
    private static final ExampleEnum[] values = values();
    public static ExampleEnum value(int ord) {
        return values[ord];
    }
}

您可以使用exampleenumeration .value(ordinal)来获取与ordinal关联的枚举值

这几乎肯定是个坏主意。当然，如果序号实际上是持久化的(例如，因为有人已将URL标记为书签)——这意味着将来必须始终保留枚举顺序，这对代码维护者来说可能不太明显。

为什么不使用myEnumValue.name()(和解码通过reporttypeenume . valueof (s))来编码枚举?