每个推荐RedGate工具的人都要加1分，还有额外的建议和警告。

SqlCompare also has a decently documented API: so you can, for instance, write a console app which syncs your source controlled scripts folder with a CI integration testing database on checkin, so that when someone checks in a change to the schema from their scripts folder it's automatically deployed along with the matching application code change. This helps close the gap with developers who are forgetful about propagating changes in their local db up to a shared development DB (about half of us, I think :) ).

A caveat is that with a scripted solution or otherwise, the RedGate tools are sufficiently smooth that it's easy to forget about SQL realities underlying the abstraction. If you rename all the columns in a table, SqlCompare has no way to map the old columns to the new columns and will drop all the data in the table. It will generate warnings but I've seen people click past that. There's a general point here worth making, I think, that you can only automate DB versioning and upgrade so far - the abstractions are very leaky.

这是一个非常古老的问题，然而，许多人甚至现在都在试图解决这个问题。他们所要做的就是研究Visual Studio数据库项目。没有这一点，任何数据库开发看起来都很薄弱。从代码组织到部署再到版本控制，它简化了一切。

不久前，我发现了一个VB bas模块，它使用DMO和VSS对象将整个db脚本删除并转换为VSS。我把它变成了一个VB脚本，并张贴在这里。您可以很容易地取出VSS调用并使用DMO东西来生成所有脚本，然后从调用VBScript的同一个批处理文件调用SVN来检入它们。

典型的解决方案是根据需要转储数据库并备份这些文件。

根据您的开发平台，可能会有可用的开源插件。编写自己的代码来完成这个任务通常是相当简单的。

注意:您可能希望备份数据库转储，而不是将其放入版本控制中。在版本控制中，文件可能会迅速变大，并导致整个源代码控制系统变慢(我正在回忆CVS的恐怖故事)。

每个推荐RedGate工具的人都要加1分，还有额外的建议和警告。

SqlCompare also has a decently documented API: so you can, for instance, write a console app which syncs your source controlled scripts folder with a CI integration testing database on checkin, so that when someone checks in a change to the schema from their scripts folder it's automatically deployed along with the matching application code change. This helps close the gap with developers who are forgetful about propagating changes in their local db up to a shared development DB (about half of us, I think :) ).

A caveat is that with a scripted solution or otherwise, the RedGate tools are sufficiently smooth that it's easy to forget about SQL realities underlying the abstraction. If you rename all the columns in a table, SqlCompare has no way to map the old columns to the new columns and will drop all the data in the table. It will generate warnings but I've seen people click past that. There's a general point here worth making, I think, that you can only automate DB versioning and upgrade so far - the abstractions are very leaky.

您还可以考虑迁移解决方案。它们允许您在c#代码中指定数据库模式，并使用MSBuild上下滚动数据库版本。

我目前正在使用DbUp，它工作得很好。