在行首显式地使用Carrage Return (\r)，而不是(隐式或显式地)在行尾使用New line (\n)，应该得到你想要的结果。例如:

void demoPercentDone() {
    for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
        System.Console.Write( "\rProcessing {0}%...", i );
        System.Threading.Thread.Sleep( 1000 );
    }
    System.Console.WriteLine();    
}

SetCursorPosition方法适用于多线程场景，而其他两个方法则不能

到目前为止，我们有三个相互竞争的替代方案:

Console.Write("\r{0}   ", value);                      // Option 1: carriage return
Console.Write("\b\b\b\b\b{0}", value);                 // Option 2: backspace
{                                                      // Option 3 in two parts:
    Console.SetCursorPosition(0, Console.CursorTop);   // - Move cursor
    Console.Write(value);                              // - Rewrite
}

我一直使用控制台。CursorLeft = 0，第三个选项的变体，所以我决定做一些测试。下面是我使用的代码:

public static void CursorTest()
{
    int testsize = 1000000;

    Console.WriteLine("Testing cursor position");
    Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
    sw.Start();
    for (int i = 0; i < testsize; i++)
    {
        Console.Write("\rCounting: {0}     ", i);
    }
    sw.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine("\nTime using \\r: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);

    sw.Reset();
    sw.Start();
    int top = Console.CursorTop;
    for (int i = 0; i < testsize; i++)
    {
        Console.SetCursorPosition(0, top);        
        Console.Write("Counting: {0}     ", i);
    }
    sw.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine("\nTime using CursorLeft: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);

    sw.Reset();
    sw.Start();
    Console.Write("Counting:          ");
    for (int i = 0; i < testsize; i++)
    {        
        Console.Write("\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b{0,8}", i);
    }

    sw.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine("\nTime using \\b: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}

在我的机器上，我得到了以下结果:

退格:25.0秒 回车:28.7秒 SetCursorPosition: 49.7秒

此外，SetCursorPosition引起了明显的闪烁，我没有观察到任何一个替代方案。所以，道德是尽可能使用退格或回车，谢谢你教我一个更快的方法来做到这一点，所以!

Update: In the comments, Joel suggests that SetCursorPosition is constant with respect to the distance moved while the other methods are linear. Further testing confirms that this is the case, however constant time and slow is still slow. In my tests, writing a long string of backspaces to the console is faster than SetCursorPosition until somewhere around 60 characters. So backspace is faster for replacing portions of the line shorter than 60 characters (or so), and it doesn't flicker, so I'm going to stand by my initial endorsement of \b over \r and SetCursorPosition.

    public void Update(string data)
    {
        Console.Write(string.Format("\r{0}", "".PadLeft(Console.CursorLeft, ' ')));
        Console.Write(string.Format("\r{0}", data));
    }

我在vb.net上寻找同样的解决方案，我发现了这个，它很棒。

然而，@JohnOdom建议了一个更好的方法来处理空格，如果前一个空格比当前空格大。

我在vb.net做了一个函数，认为有人可以得到帮助。

这是我的代码:

Private Sub sPrintStatus(strTextToPrint As String, Optional boolIsNewLine As Boolean = False)
    REM intLastLength is declared as public variable on global scope like below
    REM intLastLength As Integer
    If boolIsNewLine = True Then
        intLastLength = 0
    End If
    If intLastLength > strTextToPrint.Length Then
        Console.Write(Convert.ToChar(13) & strTextToPrint.PadRight(strTextToPrint.Length + (intLastLength - strTextToPrint.Length), Convert.ToChar(" ")))
    Else
        Console.Write(Convert.ToChar(13) & strTextToPrint)
    End If
    intLastLength = strTextToPrint.Length
End Sub

在行首显式地使用Carrage Return (\r)，而不是(隐式或显式地)在行尾使用New line (\n)，应该得到你想要的结果。例如:

void demoPercentDone() {
    for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
        System.Console.Write( "\rProcessing {0}%...", i );
        System.Threading.Thread.Sleep( 1000 );
    }
    System.Console.WriteLine();    
}