我不认为这应该很有效，但它确实有效:

@foreach (var banner in Model.MainBanners) {
    @Model.MainBanners.IndexOf(banner)
}

我只是遇到了这个问题，但在我的情况下思考这个问题给出了最好的解决方案，与预期的解决方案无关。

It could be quite a common case, basically, I'm reading from one source list and creating objects based on them in a destination list, however, I have to check whether the source items are valid first and want to return the row of any error. At first-glance, I want to get the index into the enumerator of the object at the Current property, however, as I am copying these elements, I implicitly know the current index anyway from the current destination. Obviously it depends on your destination object, but for me it was a List, and most likely it will implement ICollection.

i.e.

var destinationList = new List<someObject>();
foreach (var item in itemList)
{
  var stringArray = item.Split(new char[] { ';', ',' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);

  if (stringArray.Length != 2)
  {
    //use the destinationList Count property to give us the index into the stringArray list
    throw new Exception("Item at row " + (destinationList.Count + 1) + " has a problem.");
  }
  else
  {
    destinationList.Add(new someObject() { Prop1 = stringArray[0], Prop2 = stringArray[1]});
  }
}

我认为，虽然不总是适用，但常常足以值得一提。

不管怎样，关键是有时在你的逻辑中已经有了一个不明显的解决方案……

foreach用于迭代实现IEnumerable的集合。它通过在集合上调用GetEnumerator来实现这一点，该集合将返回一个Enumerator。

这个枚举器有一个方法和一个属性:

MoveNext () 当前的

Current返回Enumerator当前所在的对象，MoveNext将Current更新为下一个对象。

索引的概念与枚举的概念是不同的，不能这样做。

因此，大多数集合都可以使用索引器和for循环构造来遍历。

在这种情况下，与使用局部变量跟踪索引相比，我更喜欢使用for循环。

c# 7最终为我们提供了一种优雅的方式:

static class Extensions
{
    public static IEnumerable<(int, T)> Enumerate<T>(
        this IEnumerable<T> input,
        int start = 0
    )
    {
        int i = start;
        foreach (var t in input)
        {
            yield return (i++, t);
        }
    }
}

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        var s = new string[]
        {
            "Alpha",
            "Bravo",
            "Charlie",
            "Delta"
        };

        foreach (var (i, t) in s.Enumerate())
        {
            Console.WriteLine($"{i}: {t}");
        }
    }
}

我在LINQPad中构建了这个:

var listOfNames = new List<string>(){"John","Steve","Anna","Chris"};

var listCount = listOfNames.Count;

var NamesWithCommas = string.Empty;

foreach (var element in listOfNames)
{
    NamesWithCommas += element;
    if(listOfNames.IndexOf(element) != listCount -1)
    {
        NamesWithCommas += ", ";
    }
}

NamesWithCommas.Dump();  //LINQPad method to write to console.

你也可以使用string.join:

var joinResult = string.Join(",", listOfNames);

字面答案——警告，性能可能不如仅使用int来跟踪索引。至少它比使用IndexOf要好。

您只需要使用Select的索引重载，用一个知道索引的匿名对象来包装集合中的每个项。这可以针对任何实现IEnumerable的对象执行。

System.Collections.IEnumerable collection = Enumerable.Range(100, 10);

foreach (var o in collection.OfType<object>().Select((x, i) => new {x, i}))
{
    Console.WriteLine("{0} {1}", o.i, o.x);
}