在c#中是否有一些我没有遇到过的罕见的语言构造(比如我最近学过的一些,一些在Stack Overflow上)来获得表示foreach循环的当前迭代的值?
例如,我目前根据具体情况做这样的事情:
int i = 0;
foreach (Object o in collection)
{
// ...
i++;
}
在c#中是否有一些我没有遇到过的罕见的语言构造(比如我最近学过的一些,一些在Stack Overflow上)来获得表示foreach循环的当前迭代的值?
例如,我目前根据具体情况做这样的事情:
int i = 0;
foreach (Object o in collection)
{
// ...
i++;
}
当前回答
我想更理论化地讨论这个问题(因为它已经有了足够多的实际答案)
.net为数据组(又称集合)提供了一个非常好的抽象模型。
在最顶端,也是最抽象的,你有一个IEnumerable它只是一组你可以枚举的数据。你如何枚举并不重要,重要的是你可以枚举一些数据。这个枚举是由一个完全不同的对象完成的,IEnumerator
这些接口定义如下:
//
// Summary:
// Exposes an enumerator, which supports a simple iteration over a non-generic collection.
public interface IEnumerable
{
//
// Summary:
// Returns an enumerator that iterates through a collection.
//
// Returns:
// An System.Collections.IEnumerator object that can be used to iterate through
// the collection.
IEnumerator GetEnumerator();
}
//
// Summary:
// Supports a simple iteration over a non-generic collection.
public interface IEnumerator
{
//
// Summary:
// Gets the element in the collection at the current position of the enumerator.
//
// Returns:
// The element in the collection at the current position of the enumerator.
object Current { get; }
//
// Summary:
// Advances the enumerator to the next element of the collection.
//
// Returns:
// true if the enumerator was successfully advanced to the next element; false if
// the enumerator has passed the end of the collection.
//
// Exceptions:
// T:System.InvalidOperationException:
// The collection was modified after the enumerator was created.
bool MoveNext();
//
// Summary:
// Sets the enumerator to its initial position, which is before the first element
// in the collection.
//
// Exceptions:
// T:System.InvalidOperationException:
// The collection was modified after the enumerator was created.
void Reset();
}
as you might have noticed, the IEnumerator interface doesn't "know" what an index is, it just knows what element it's currently pointing to, and how to move to the next one. now here is the trick: foreach considers every input collection an IEnumerable, even if it is a more concrete implementation like an IList<T> (which inherits from IEnumerable), it will only see the abstract interface IEnumerable. what foreach is actually doing, is calling GetEnumerator on the collection, and calling MoveNext until it returns false. so here is the problem, you want to define a concrete concept "Indices" on an abstract concept "Enumerables", the built in foreach construct doesn't give you that option, so your only way is to define it yourself, either by what you are doing originally (creating a counter manually) or just use an implementation of IEnumerator that recognizes indices AND implement a foreach construct that recognizes that custom implementation.
就我个人而言,我会创建一个这样的扩展方法
public static class Ext
{
public static void FE<T>(this IEnumerable<T> l, Action<int, T> act)
{
int counter = 0;
foreach (var item in l)
{
act(counter, item);
counter++;
}
}
}
像这样使用它
var x = new List<string>() { "hello", "world" };
x.FE((ind, ele) =>
{
Console.WriteLine($"{ind}: {ele}");
});
这也避免了在其他答案中看到的任何不必要的分配。
其他回答
为什么?!
如果你使用List,最简单的方法是使用for而不是foreach:
for (int i = 0 ; i < myList.Count ; i++)
{
// Do something...
}
或者如果你想使用foreach:
foreach (string m in myList)
{
// Do something...
}
你可以用它来知道每个循环的索引:
myList.indexOf(m)
使用LINQ, c# 7和系统。ValueTuple NuGet包,你可以这样做:
foreach (var (value, index) in collection.Select((v, i)=>(v, i))) {
Console.WriteLine(value + " is at index " + index);
}
您可以使用常规的foreach构造,并能够直接访问值和索引,而不是作为对象的成员,并将这两个字段仅保留在循环的作用域中。基于这些原因,我相信这是最好的解决方案,如果你能够使用c# 7和System.ValueTuple。
我在LINQPad中构建了这个:
var listOfNames = new List<string>(){"John","Steve","Anna","Chris"};
var listCount = listOfNames.Count;
var NamesWithCommas = string.Empty;
foreach (var element in listOfNames)
{
NamesWithCommas += element;
if(listOfNames.IndexOf(element) != listCount -1)
{
NamesWithCommas += ", ";
}
}
NamesWithCommas.Dump(); //LINQPad method to write to console.
你也可以使用string.join:
var joinResult = string.Join(",", listOfNames);
只需添加自己的索引。保持简单。
int i = -1;
foreach (var item in Collection)
{
++i;
item.index = i;
}
这是我刚想到的解决这个问题的办法
原始代码:
int index=0;
foreach (var item in enumerable)
{
blah(item, index); // some code that depends on the index
index++;
}
更新代码
enumerable.ForEach((item, index) => blah(item, index));
扩展方法:
public static IEnumerable<T> ForEach<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable, Action<T, int> action)
{
var unit = new Unit(); // unit is a new type from the reactive framework (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/devlabs/ee794896.aspx) to represent a void, since in C# you can't return a void
enumerable.Select((item, i) =>
{
action(item, i);
return unit;
}).ToList();
return pSource;
}