我知道这个问题已经被回答过几次了，但我喜欢下面的方法。我希望它能帮助到一些人。

//attach object (search for row)
TableName tn = _context.TableNames.Attach(new TableName { PK_COLUMN = YOUR_VALUE});
// set new value
tn.COLUMN_NAME_TO_UPDATE = NEW_COLUMN_VALUE;
// set column as modified
_context.Entry<TableName>(tn).Property(tnp => tnp.COLUMN_NAME_TO_UPDATE).IsModified = true;
// save change
_context.SaveChanges();

试一试……

UpdateModel(图书);

var book = new Model.Book
{
    BookNumber =  _book.BookNumber,
    BookName = _book.BookName,
    BookTitle = _book.BookTitle,
};
using (var db = new MyContextDB())
{
    var result = db.Books.SingleOrDefault(b => b.BookNumber == bookNumber);
    if (result != null)
    {
        try
        {
            UpdateModel(book);
            db.Books.Attach(book);
            db.Entry(book).State = EntityState.Modified;
            db.SaveChanges();
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            throw;
        }
    }
}

我找到了一个很好的方法。

 var Update = context.UpdateTables.Find(id);
        Update.Title = title;

        // Mark as Changed
        context.Entry(Update).State = System.Data.Entity.EntityState.Modified;
        context.SaveChanges();

你应该删除db.Books.Attach(book);

对于。net core

context.Customer.Add(customer);
context.Entry(customer).State = Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.EntityState.Modified;
context.SaveChanges();

Not related to this specific example, but I came across a challenge when trying to use EF and a DateTime field as the concurrency check field. It appears the EF concurrency code doesn't honor the precision setting from the metadata (edmx) i.e. Type="DateTime" Precision="3". The database datetime field will store a millisecond component within the field (i.e. 2020-10-18 15:49:02.123). Even if you set the original value of the Entity to a DateTime that includes the millisecond component, the SQL EF generates is this:

UPDATE [dbo].[People]
SET [dateUpdated] = @0
WHERE (([PeopleID] = @1) AND ([dateUpdated] = @2))
-- @0: '10/19/2020 1:07:00 AM' (Type = DateTime2)
-- @1: '3182' (Type = Int32)
-- @2: '10/19/2020 1:06:10 AM' (Type = DateTime2)

正如您所看到的，@2是一个没有毫秒组件的STRING表示。这将导致更新失败。

因此，如果您打算使用DateTime字段作为并发键，那么在检索记录时必须从数据库字段中剥离毫秒/ tick，并且仅使用类似剥离的DateTime传递/更新字段。

    //strip milliseconds due to EF concurrency handling
    PeopleModel p = db.people.Where(x => x.PeopleID = id);
    if (p.dateUpdated.Millisecond > 0)
    {
        DateTime d = new DateTime(p.dateUpdated.Ticks / 10000000 * 10000000);
        object[] b = {p.PeopleID, d};
        int upd = db.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand("Update People set dateUpdated=@p1 where peopleId=@p0", b);
        if (upd == 1)
            p.dateUpdated = d;
        else
            return InternalServerError(new Exception("Unable to update dateUpdated"));
    }
return Ok(p);

当用新值更新字段时，也去掉毫秒

(param)int id, PeopleModel person;
People tbl = db.People.Where(x => x.PeopleID == id).FirstOrDefault();
db.Entry(tbl).OriginalValues["dateUpdated"] = person.dateUpdated;
//strip milliseconds from dateUpdated since EF doesn't preserve them
tbl.dateUpdated = new DateTime(DateTime.Now.Ticks / 10000000 * 10000000);