当通过lambda表达式传入时，是否有更好的方法来获得属性名?
这是我目前拥有的。
eg.
GetSortingInfo<User>(u => u.UserId);
它只在属性为字符串时才将其转换为成员表达式。因为不是所有的属性都是字符串，我必须使用object，但它会为那些返回一个unaryexpression。
public static RouteValueDictionary GetInfo<T>(this HtmlHelper html,
Expression<Func<T, object>> action) where T : class
{
var expression = GetMemberInfo(action);
string name = expression.Member.Name;
return GetInfo(html, name);
}
private static MemberExpression GetMemberInfo(Expression method)
{
LambdaExpression lambda = method as LambdaExpression;
if (lambda == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("method");
MemberExpression memberExpr = null;
if (lambda.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.Convert)
{
memberExpr =
((UnaryExpression)lambda.Body).Operand as MemberExpression;
}
else if (lambda.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.MemberAccess)
{
memberExpr = lambda.Body as MemberExpression;
}
if (memberExpr == null)
throw new ArgumentException("method");
return memberExpr;
}
这是一个通用的实现，用于获取struct/class/interface/delegate/array的字段/属性/索引器/方法/扩展方法/委托的字符串名称。我已经测试了静态/实例和非泛型/泛型变体的组合。
//involves recursion
public static string GetMemberName(this LambdaExpression memberSelector)
{
Func<Expression, string> nameSelector = null; //recursive func
nameSelector = e => //or move the entire thing to a separate recursive method
{
switch (e.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Parameter:
return ((ParameterExpression)e).Name;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
return ((MemberExpression)e).Member.Name;
case ExpressionType.Call:
return ((MethodCallExpression)e).Method.Name;
case ExpressionType.Convert:
case ExpressionType.ConvertChecked:
return nameSelector(((UnaryExpression)e).Operand);
case ExpressionType.Invoke:
return nameSelector(((InvocationExpression)e).Expression);
case ExpressionType.ArrayLength:
return "Length";
default:
throw new Exception("not a proper member selector");
}
};
return nameSelector(memberSelector.Body);
}
这个东西也可以写在一个简单的while循环中:
//iteration based
public static string GetMemberName(this LambdaExpression memberSelector)
{
var currentExpression = memberSelector.Body;
while (true)
{
switch (currentExpression.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Parameter:
return ((ParameterExpression)currentExpression).Name;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
return ((MemberExpression)currentExpression).Member.Name;
case ExpressionType.Call:
return ((MethodCallExpression)currentExpression).Method.Name;
case ExpressionType.Convert:
case ExpressionType.ConvertChecked:
currentExpression = ((UnaryExpression)currentExpression).Operand;
break;
case ExpressionType.Invoke:
currentExpression = ((InvocationExpression)currentExpression).Expression;
break;
case ExpressionType.ArrayLength:
return "Length";
default:
throw new Exception("not a proper member selector");
}
}
}
我喜欢递归方法，尽管第二种方法可能更容易阅读。我们可以这样称呼它:
someExpr = x => x.Property.ExtensionMethod()[0]; //or
someExpr = x => Static.Method().Field; //or
someExpr = x => VoidMethod(); //or
someExpr = () => localVariable; //or
someExpr = x => x; //or
someExpr = x => (Type)x; //or
someExpr = () => Array[0].Delegate(null); //etc
string name = someExpr.GetMemberName();
打印最后一个成员。
注意:
对于像a.b.c.这样的链式表达式，将返回“C”。
这并不适用于const，数组索引器或枚举(不可能涵盖所有情况)。
我发现一些建议的答案钻到MemberExpression/UnaryExpression不捕获嵌套/子属性。
o =>。Thing2返回Thing1而不是Thing1.Thing2。
如果您试图使用EntityFramework DbSet.Include(…)，这种区别就很重要。
我发现只要解析Expression.ToString()就可以了，而且速度相对较快。我将它与UnaryExpression版本进行了比较，甚至从成员/UnaryExpression中获得ToString，以查看是否更快，但差异可以忽略不计。如果这是个糟糕的主意，请纠正我。
可拓法
/// <summary>
/// Given an expression, extract the listed property name; similar to reflection but with familiar LINQ+lambdas. Technique @via https://stackoverflow.com/a/16647343/1037948
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>Cheats and uses the tostring output -- Should consult performance differences</remarks>
/// <typeparam name="TModel">the model type to extract property names</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TValue">the value type of the expected property</typeparam>
/// <param name="propertySelector">expression that just selects a model property to be turned into a string</param>
/// <param name="delimiter">Expression toString delimiter to split from lambda param</param>
/// <param name="endTrim">Sometimes the Expression toString contains a method call, something like "Convert(x)", so we need to strip the closing part from the end</param>
/// <returns>indicated property name</returns>
public static string GetPropertyName<TModel, TValue>(this Expression<Func<TModel, TValue>> propertySelector, char delimiter = '.', char endTrim = ')') {
var asString = propertySelector.ToString(); // gives you: "o => o.Whatever"
var firstDelim = asString.IndexOf(delimiter); // make sure there is a beginning property indicator; the "." in "o.Whatever" -- this may not be necessary?
return firstDelim < 0
? asString
: asString.Substring(firstDelim+1).TrimEnd(endTrim);
}//-- fn GetPropertyNameExtended
(检查分隔符甚至可能是多余的)
演示 （LinqPad）
演示+比较代码—https://gist.github.com/zaus/6992590
当涉及到Array.Length时，有一个边缘情况。虽然'Length'被公开为属性，但您不能在任何前面提出的解决方案中使用它。
using Contract = System.Diagnostics.Contracts.Contract;
using Exprs = System.Linq.Expressions;
static string PropertyNameFromMemberExpr(Exprs.MemberExpression expr)
{
return expr.Member.Name;
}
static string PropertyNameFromUnaryExpr(Exprs.UnaryExpression expr)
{
if (expr.NodeType == Exprs.ExpressionType.ArrayLength)
return "Length";
var mem_expr = expr.Operand as Exprs.MemberExpression;
return PropertyNameFromMemberExpr(mem_expr);
}
static string PropertyNameFromLambdaExpr(Exprs.LambdaExpression expr)
{
if (expr.Body is Exprs.MemberExpression) return PropertyNameFromMemberExpr(expr.Body as Exprs.MemberExpression);
else if (expr.Body is Exprs.UnaryExpression) return PropertyNameFromUnaryExpr(expr.Body as Exprs.UnaryExpression);
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
public static string PropertyNameFromExpr<TProp>(Exprs.Expression<Func<TProp>> expr)
{
Contract.Requires<ArgumentNullException>(expr != null);
Contract.Requires<ArgumentException>(expr.Body is Exprs.MemberExpression || expr.Body is Exprs.UnaryExpression);
return PropertyNameFromLambdaExpr(expr);
}
public static string PropertyNameFromExpr<T, TProp>(Exprs.Expression<Func<T, TProp>> expr)
{
Contract.Requires<ArgumentNullException>(expr != null);
Contract.Requires<ArgumentException>(expr.Body is Exprs.MemberExpression || expr.Body is Exprs.UnaryExpression);
return PropertyNameFromLambdaExpr(expr);
}
现在看用法示例:
int[] someArray = new int[1];
Console.WriteLine(PropertyNameFromExpr( () => someArray.Length ));
如果PropertyNameFromUnaryExpr没有检查ArrayLength， "someArray"将被打印到控制台(编译器似乎生成了对支持Length字段的直接访问，作为优化，甚至在调试中，因此是特殊情况)。
从。net 4.0开始，你可以使用ExpressionVisitor来查找属性:
class ExprVisitor : ExpressionVisitor {
public bool IsFound { get; private set; }
public string MemberName { get; private set; }
public Type MemberType { get; private set; }
protected override Expression VisitMember(MemberExpression node) {
if (!IsFound && node.Member.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property) {
IsFound = true;
MemberName = node.Member.Name;
MemberType = node.Type;
}
return base.VisitMember(node);
}
}
下面是如何使用这个访问者:
var visitor = new ExprVisitor();
visitor.Visit(expr);
if (visitor.IsFound) {
Console.WriteLine("First property in the expression tree: Name={0}, Type={1}", visitor.MemberName, visitor.MemberType.FullName);
} else {
Console.WriteLine("No properties found.");
}
public string GetName<TSource, TField>(Expression<Func<TSource, TField>> Field)
{
return (Field.Body as MemberExpression ?? ((UnaryExpression)Field.Body).Operand as MemberExpression).Member.Name;
}
这个函数处理成员表达式和一元表达式。区别在于，如果你的表达式表示值类型，你将得到一个UnaryExpression，而如果你的表达式表示引用类型，你将得到一个MemberExpression。所有内容都可以转换为对象，但值类型必须被装箱。这就是UnaryExpression存在的原因。参考。
出于可读性考虑(@Jowen)，这里有一个扩展的等效内容:
public string GetName<TSource, TField>(Expression<Func<TSource, TField>> Field)
{
if (object.Equals(Field, null))
{
throw new NullReferenceException("Field is required");
}
MemberExpression expr = null;
if (Field.Body is MemberExpression)
{
expr = (MemberExpression)Field.Body;
}
else if (Field.Body is UnaryExpression)
{
expr = (MemberExpression)((UnaryExpression)Field.Body).Operand;
}
else
{
const string Format = "Expression '{0}' not supported.";
string message = string.Format(Format, Field);
throw new ArgumentException(message, "Field");
}
return expr.Member.Name;
}
