当通过lambda表达式传入时，是否有更好的方法来获得属性名?
这是我目前拥有的。
eg.
GetSortingInfo<User>(u => u.UserId);
它只在属性为字符串时才将其转换为成员表达式。因为不是所有的属性都是字符串，我必须使用object，但它会为那些返回一个unaryexpression。
public static RouteValueDictionary GetInfo<T>(this HtmlHelper html,
Expression<Func<T, object>> action) where T : class
{
var expression = GetMemberInfo(action);
string name = expression.Member.Name;
return GetInfo(html, name);
}
private static MemberExpression GetMemberInfo(Expression method)
{
LambdaExpression lambda = method as LambdaExpression;
if (lambda == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("method");
MemberExpression memberExpr = null;
if (lambda.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.Convert)
{
memberExpr =
((UnaryExpression)lambda.Body).Operand as MemberExpression;
}
else if (lambda.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.MemberAccess)
{
memberExpr = lambda.Body as MemberExpression;
}
if (memberExpr == null)
throw new ArgumentException("method");
return memberExpr;
}
我最近做了一件非常类似的事情来创建一个类型安全的OnPropertyChanged方法。
下面是一个方法，它将返回表达式的PropertyInfo对象。如果表达式不是属性，则抛出异常。
public PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo<TSource, TProperty>(
TSource source,
Expression<Func<TSource, TProperty>> propertyLambda)
{
Type type = typeof(TSource);
MemberExpression member = propertyLambda.Body as MemberExpression;
if (member == null)
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a method, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
PropertyInfo propInfo = member.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (propInfo == null)
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a field, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
if (type != propInfo.ReflectedType &&
!type.IsSubclassOf(propInfo.ReflectedType))
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a property that is not from type {1}.",
propertyLambda.ToString(),
type));
return propInfo;
}
使用源参数，编译器可以对方法调用进行类型推断。您可以执行以下操作
var propertyInfo = GetPropertyInfo(someUserObject, u => u.UserID);
public string GetName<TSource, TField>(Expression<Func<TSource, TField>> Field)
{
return (Field.Body as MemberExpression ?? ((UnaryExpression)Field.Body).Operand as MemberExpression).Member.Name;
}
这个函数处理成员表达式和一元表达式。区别在于，如果你的表达式表示值类型，你将得到一个UnaryExpression，而如果你的表达式表示引用类型，你将得到一个MemberExpression。所有内容都可以转换为对象，但值类型必须被装箱。这就是UnaryExpression存在的原因。参考。
出于可读性考虑(@Jowen)，这里有一个扩展的等效内容:
public string GetName<TSource, TField>(Expression<Func<TSource, TField>> Field)
{
if (object.Equals(Field, null))
{
throw new NullReferenceException("Field is required");
}
MemberExpression expr = null;
if (Field.Body is MemberExpression)
{
expr = (MemberExpression)Field.Body;
}
else if (Field.Body is UnaryExpression)
{
expr = (MemberExpression)((UnaryExpression)Field.Body).Operand;
}
else
{
const string Format = "Expression '{0}' not supported.";
string message = string.Format(Format, Field);
throw new ArgumentException(message, "Field");
}
return expr.Member.Name;
}
我正在使用一个扩展方法的前c# 6项目和名称()的目标c# 6。
public static class MiscExtentions
{
public static string NameOf<TModel, TProperty>(this object @object, Expression<Func<TModel, TProperty>> propertyExpression)
{
var expression = propertyExpression.Body as MemberExpression;
if (expression == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException("Expression is not a property.");
}
return expression.Member.Name;
}
}
我称之为:
public class MyClass
{
public int Property1 { get; set; }
public string Property2 { get; set; }
public int[] Property3 { get; set; }
public Subclass Property4 { get; set; }
public Subclass[] Property5 { get; set; }
}
public class Subclass
{
public int PropertyA { get; set; }
public string PropertyB { get; set; }
}
// result is Property1
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property1);
// result is Property2
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property2);
// result is Property3
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property3);
// result is Property4
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property4);
// result is PropertyB
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property4.PropertyB);
// result is Property5
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property5);
它可以很好地处理字段和属性。
