OOP只是一个范例，在程序中数据比代码更重要。OOP不是一种语言。因此，就像普通C是一种简单的语言一样，普通C中的OOP也很简单。

我已经研究这个一年了

由于GObject系统很难用纯C语言使用，所以我尝试编写一些不错的宏来简化C语言的OO风格。

#include "OOStd.h"

CLASS(Animal) {
    char *name;
    STATIC(Animal);
    vFn talk;
};
static int Animal_load(Animal *THIS,void *name) {
    THIS->name = name;
    return 0;
}
ASM(Animal, Animal_load, NULL, NULL, NULL)

CLASS_EX(Cat,Animal) {
    STATIC_EX(Cat, Animal);
};
static void Meow(Animal *THIS){
    printf("Meow!My name is %s!\n", THIS->name);
}

static int Cat_loadSt(StAnimal *THIS, void *PARAM){
    THIS->talk = (void *)Meow;
    return 0;
}
ASM_EX(Cat,Animal, NULL, NULL, Cat_loadSt, NULL)


CLASS_EX(Dog,Animal){
    STATIC_EX(Dog, Animal);
};

static void Woof(Animal *THIS){
    printf("Woof!My name is %s!\n", THIS->name);
}

static int Dog_loadSt(StAnimal *THIS, void *PARAM) {
    THIS->talk = (void *)Woof;
    return 0;
}
ASM_EX(Dog, Animal, NULL, NULL, Dog_loadSt, NULL)

int main(){
    Animal *animals[4000];
    StAnimal *f;
    int i = 0;
    for (i=0; i<4000; i++)
    {
        if(i%2==0)
            animals[i] = NEW(Dog,"Jack");
        else
            animals[i] = NEW(Cat,"Lily");
    };
    f = ST(animals[0]);
    for(i=0; i<4000; ++i) {
        f->talk(animals[i]);
    }
    for (i=0; i<4000; ++i) {
        DELETE0(animals[i]);
    }
    return 0;
}

这是我的项目网站(我没有足够的时间写en。Doc，不过中文的Doc要好得多)。

东方海外海湾合作委员会

命名空间通常通过以下方式实现:

stack_push(thing *)

而不是

stack::push(thing *)

要将C结构体变成类似c++类的东西，您可以转向:

class stack {
     public:
        stack();
        void push(thing *);
        thing * pop();
        static int this_is_here_as_an_example_only;
     private:
        ...
};

Into

struct stack {
     struct stack_type * my_type;
     // Put the stuff that you put after private: here
};
struct stack_type {
     void (* construct)(struct stack * this); // This takes uninitialized memory
     struct stack * (* operator_new)(); // This allocates a new struct, passes it to construct, and then returns it
     void (*push)(struct stack * this, thing * t); // Pushing t onto this stack
     thing * (*pop)(struct stack * this); // Pops the top thing off the stack and returns it
     int this_is_here_as_an_example_only;
}Stack = {
    .construct = stack_construct,
    .operator_new = stack_operator_new,
    .push = stack_push,
    .pop = stack_pop
};
// All of these functions are assumed to be defined somewhere else

和做的事:

struct stack * st = Stack.operator_new(); // Make a new stack
if (!st) {
   // Do something about it
} else {
   // You can use the stack
   stack_push(st, thing0); // This is a non-virtual call
   Stack.push(st, thing1); // This is like casting *st to a Stack (which it already is) and doing the push
   st->my_type.push(st, thing2); // This is a virtual call
}

我没有做析构函数或删除，但它遵循相同的模式。

This_is_here_as_an_example_only类似于一个静态类变量——在一个类型的所有实例之间共享。所有的方法都是静态的，除了一些采用this *

这本书读起来很有趣。我自己也在思考同样的问题，思考这个问题的好处是:

Trying to imagine how to implement OOP concepts in a non-OOP language helps me understand the strengths of the OOp language (in my case, C++). This helps give me better judgement about whether to use C or C++ for a given type of application -- where the benefits of one out-weighs the other. In my browsing the web for information and opinions on this I found an author who was writing code for an embedded processor and only had a C compiler available: http://www.eetimes.com/discussion/other/4024626/Object-Oriented-C-Creating-Foundation-Classes-Part-1

在他的案例中，用普通C语言分析和调整面向对象的概念是一种有效的追求。他似乎愿意牺牲一些面向对象的概念，因为尝试用C语言实现它们会带来性能开销。

我得到的教训是，是的，在某种程度上它是可以做到的，是的，有一些很好的理由去尝试。

In the end, the machine is twiddling stack pointer bits, making the program counter jump around and calculating memory access operations. From the efficiency standpoint, the fewer of these calculations done by your program, the better... but sometimes we have to pay this tax simply so we can organize our program in a way that makes it least susceptible to human error. The OOP language compiler strives to optimize both aspects. The programmer has to be much more careful implementing these concepts in a language like C.

如果您确信面向对象的方法对于您正在尝试解决的问题更优越，那么为什么还要尝试使用非面向对象的语言来解决它呢?看来你用错工具了。使用c++或其他面向对象的C语言变体。

如果你问这个问题是因为你要开始在一个已经存在的用C编写的大型项目上编写代码，那么你不应该试图将你自己的(或其他人的)OOP范式强加到项目的基础设施中。遵循项目中已经存在的指导方针。一般来说，干净的api和独立的库和模块将有助于实现干净的面向对象的设计。

如果，在所有这些之后，你真的打算做OOP C，请阅读这篇文章(PDF)。

在Jim Larson 1996年在312节编程午餐研讨会上的演讲中有一个使用C进行继承的例子:高级和低级C。