我有一个React组件,在组件的渲染方法中,我有这样的东西:

render() {
    return (
        <div>
            <div>
                // removed for brevity
            </div>

           { switch(...) {} }

            <div>
                // removed for brevity
            </div>
        </div>
    );
}

Now the point is that I have two div elements, one at the top and one at the bottom, that are fixed. In the middle I want to have a switch statement, and according to a value in my state I want to render a different component. So basically, I want the two div elements to be fixed always, and just in the middle to render a different component each time. I'm using this to implement a multi-step payment procedure). Though, as is the code currently it doesn't work, as it gives me an error saying that switch is unexpected. Any ideas how to achieve what I want?


当前回答

我真的很喜欢https://stackoverflow.com/a/60313570/770134中的建议,所以我把它改成了Typescript

import React, { FunctionComponent } from 'react'
import { Optional } from "typescript-optional";
const { ofNullable } = Optional

interface SwitchProps {
  test: string
  defaultComponent: JSX.Element
}

export const Switch: FunctionComponent<SwitchProps> = (props) => {
  return ofNullable(props.children)
    .map((children) => {
      return ofNullable((children as JSX.Element[]).find((child) => child.props['value'] === props.test))
        .orElse(props.defaultComponent)
    })
    .orElseThrow(() => new Error('Children are required for a switch component'))
}

const Foo = ({ value = "foo" }) => <div>foo</div>;
const Bar = ({ value = "bar" }) => <div>bar</div>;
const value = "foo";
const SwitchExample = <Switch test={value} defaultComponent={<div />}>
  <Foo />
  <Bar />
</Switch>;

其他回答

与其他答案相比,我更倾向于在渲染函数中内联“开关”。它使什么组件可以在那个位置呈现更清楚。你可以使用一个简单的javascript对象来实现一个类似switch的表达式:

render () {
  return (
    <div>
      <div>
        {/* removed for brevity */}
      </div>
      {
        {
          'foo': <Foo />,
          'bar': <Bar />
        }[param]
      }
      <div>
        {/* removed for brevity */}
      </div>
    </div>
  )
}

我不太喜欢当前的任何答案,因为它们要么太啰嗦,要么需要您在代码中跳跃才能理解发生了什么。

我更喜欢用一个更以react组件为中心的方式来做这件事,通过创建一个<Switch/>。这个组件的任务是获取一个道具,并且只呈现子道具与该道具匹配的子元素。所以在下面的例子中,我在开关上创建了一个测试道具,并将其与子节点上的值道具进行比较,只渲染匹配的值道具。

例子:

const Switch = props => { const { test, children } = props // filter out only children with a matching prop return children.find(child => { return child.props.value === test }) } const Sample = props => { const someTest = true return ( <Switch test={someTest}> <div value={false}>Will display if someTest is false</div> <div value={true}>Will display if someTest is true</div> </Switch> ) } ReactDOM.render( <Sample/>, document.getElementById("react") ); <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.6.3/umd/react.production.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.6.3/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script> <div id="react"></div>

您可以根据自己的需要进行简单或复杂的切换。不要忘记对子节点及其值道具执行更健壮的检查。

这是因为switch语句是一个语句,但这里javascript需要一个表达式。

虽然,不建议在呈现方法中使用switch语句,但你可以使用自调用函数来实现这一点:

render() {
    // Don't forget to return a value in a switch statement
    return (
        <div>
            {(() => {
                switch(...) {}
            })()}
        </div>
    );
}

我将接受的答案转换为箭头功能组件解决方案,看到James提供了类似的答案,可以得到未定义的错误。这就是解决方案:

  const renderSwitch = (param) => {
    switch (param) {
      case "foo":
        return "bar";
      default:
        return "foo";
    }
  };

  return (
    <div>
      <div></div>

      {renderSwitch(param)}

      <div></div>
    </div>
  );

一种在渲染块中使用条件操作符表示一种开关的方法:

{(someVar === 1 &&
    <SomeContent/>)
|| (someVar === 2 &&
    <SomeOtherContent />)
|| (this.props.someProp === "something" &&
    <YetSomeOtherContent />)
|| (this.props.someProp === "foo" && this.props.someOtherProp === "bar" &&
    <OtherContentAgain />)
||
    <SomeDefaultContent />
}

应该确保条件严格返回布尔值。