如何将一个数除3而不使用*、/、+、-、%等运算符?
号码可以有签名,也可以没有签名。
如何将一个数除3而不使用*、/、+、-、%等运算符?
号码可以有签名,也可以没有签名。
当前回答
使用Linux shell脚本:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int number = 30;
char command[25];
snprintf(command, 25, "echo $((%d %c 3)) ", number, 47);
system( command );
return 0;
}
请看我的另一个答案。
其他回答
你可以使用(依赖于平台)内联程序集,例如,对于x86:(也适用于负数)
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
int dividend = -42, divisor = 5, quotient, remainder;
__asm__ ( "cdq; idivl %%ebx;"
: "=a" (quotient), "=d" (remainder)
: "a" (dividend), "b" (divisor)
: );
printf("%i / %i = %i, remainder: %i\n", dividend, divisor, quotient, remainder);
return 0;
}
这在Setun电脑上很容易实现。
要把一个整数除3,右移1位。
不过,我不确定在这样的平台上是否有可能实现一个符合标准的C编译器。我们可能需要稍微扩展一下规则,比如将“至少8位”解释为“能够保存至少从-128到+127的整数”。
这是一个执行所需操作的简单函数。但是它需要+操作符,所以你所要做的就是用位操作符来加值:
// replaces the + operator
int add(int x, int y)
{
while (x) {
int t = (x & y) << 1;
y ^= x;
x = t;
}
return y;
}
int divideby3(int num)
{
int sum = 0;
while (num > 3) {
sum = add(num >> 2, sum);
num = add(num >> 2, num & 3);
}
if (num == 3)
sum = add(sum, 1);
return sum;
}
正如吉姆评论的那样,这是可行的,因为:
N = 4 * a + b N / 3 = a + (a + b) / 3 sum += an = a + b,然后迭代 当a == 0 (n < 4)时,sum += floor(n / 3);即1,如果n == 3,否则为0
我会用这段代码除所有正数,非浮点数。基本上你要把除数位向左对齐以匹配被除数位。对于被除数的每一段(除数的大小),你想要检查是否被除数的每一段大于除数,然后你想要左Shift,然后在第一个注册器中OR。这个概念最初是在2004年创建的(我相信是斯坦福大学),这里是一个C版本,它使用了这个概念。注:(我做了一点修改)
int divide(int a, int b)
{
int c = 0, r = 32, i = 32, p = a + 1;
unsigned long int d = 0x80000000;
while ((b & d) == 0)
{
d >>= 1;
r--;
}
while (p > a)
{
c <<= 1;
p = (b >> i--) & ((1 << r) - 1);
if (p >= a)
c |= 1;
}
return c; //p is remainder (for modulus)
}
使用示例:
int n = divide( 3, 6); //outputs 2
Yet another solution. This should handle all ints (including negative ints) except the min value of an int, which would need to be handled as a hard coded exception. This basically does division by subtraction but only using bit operators (shifts, xor, & and complement). For faster speed, it subtracts 3 * (decreasing powers of 2). In c#, it executes around 444 of these DivideBy3 calls per millisecond (2.2 seconds for 1,000,000 divides), so not horrendously slow, but no where near as fast as a simple x/3. By comparison, Coodey's nice solution is about 5 times faster than this one.
public static int DivideBy3(int a) {
bool negative = a < 0;
if (negative) a = Negate(a);
int result;
int sub = 3 << 29;
int threes = 1 << 29;
result = 0;
while (threes > 0) {
if (a >= sub) {
a = Add(a, Negate(sub));
result = Add(result, threes);
}
sub >>= 1;
threes >>= 1;
}
if (negative) result = Negate(result);
return result;
}
public static int Negate(int a) {
return Add(~a, 1);
}
public static int Add(int a, int b) {
int x = 0;
x = a ^ b;
while ((a & b) != 0) {
b = (a & b) << 1;
a = x;
x = a ^ b;
}
return x;
}
这是c#,因为这是我手边的东西,但与c的区别应该很小。