我想最多四舍五入两位小数，但只有在必要时。
输入：
10
1.7777777
9.1
输出：
10
1.78
9.1
如何在JavaScript中执行此操作？
当前回答
MarkG和Lavamantis提供了一个比已被接受的解决方案更好的解决方案。很遗憾他们没有得到更多的支持票！
这是我用来解决浮点小数问题的函数，也是基于MDN的。它甚至比Lavamantis的解决方案更通用（但不够简洁）：
function round(value, exp) {
if (typeof exp === 'undefined' || +exp === 0)
return Math.round(value);
value = +value;
exp = +exp;
if (isNaN(value) || !(typeof exp === 'number' && exp % 1 === 0))
return NaN;
// Shift
value = value.toString().split('e');
value = Math.round(+(value[0] + 'e' + (value[1] ? (+value[1] + exp) : exp)));
// Shift back
value = value.toString().split('e');
return +(value[0] + 'e' + (value[1] ? (+value[1] - exp) : -exp));
}
将其用于：
round(10.8034, 2); // Returns 10.8
round(1.275, 2); // Returns 1.28
round(1.27499, 2); // Returns 1.27
round(1.2345678e+2, 2); // Returns 123.46
与拉瓦曼蒂斯的解决方案相比，我们可以做到。。。
round(1234.5678, -2); // Returns 1200
round("123.45"); // Returns 123
其他回答
MarkG的答案是正确的。这里是任何小数位数的通用扩展。
Number.prototype.round = function(places) {
return +(Math.round(this + "e+" + places) + "e-" + places);
}
用法：
var n = 1.7777;
n.round(2); // 1.78
单元测试：
it.only('should round floats to 2 places', function() {
var cases = [
{ n: 10, e: 10, p:2 },
{ n: 1.7777, e: 1.78, p:2 },
{ n: 1.005, e: 1.01, p:2 },
{ n: 1.005, e: 1, p:0 },
{ n: 1.77777, e: 1.8, p:1 }
]
cases.forEach(function(testCase) {
var r = testCase.n.round(testCase.p);
assert.equal(r, testCase.e, 'didn\'t get right number');
});
})
我的解决方案将输入视为字符串，并使用n位数字的“数学舍入”算法：取n位数字，如果数字n+1等于或大于5，则加1。它还允许指定负数，例如，将123.45舍入为-1的数字为120。它也适用于科学符号（例如1.2e-3）。我没有测量它的速度，我认为这不是最好的表现。
function safeRound( numInput, numPrecision ) {
const strNumber = numInput.toString().replace( 'E', 'e' );
const bSign = '+-'.indexOf( strNumber[ 0 ] ) !== -1;
const strSign = bSign ? strNumber[ 0 ] : '';
const numSign = strSign !== '-' ? +1 : -1;
const ixExponent = ( ixFound => ixFound !== -1 ? ixFound : strNumber.length )( strNumber.indexOf( 'e' ) );
const strExponent = strNumber.substr( ixExponent + 1 );
const numExponent = ixExponent !== strNumber.length ? Number.parseInt( strExponent ) : 0;
const ixDecimal = ( ixFound => ixFound !== -1 ? ixFound : ixExponent )( strNumber.indexOf( '.' ) );
const strInteger = strNumber.substring( !bSign ? 0 : 1, ixDecimal );
const strFraction = strNumber.substring( ixDecimal + 1, ixExponent );
const numPrecisionAdjusted = numPrecision + numExponent;
const strIntegerKeep = strInteger.substring( 0, strInteger.length + Math.min( 0, numPrecisionAdjusted ) ) + '0'.repeat( -Math.min( 0, numPrecisionAdjusted ) );
const strFractionKeep = strFraction.substring( 0, Math.max( 0, numPrecisionAdjusted ) );
const strRoundedDown = strSign + ( strIntegerKeep === '' ? '0' : strIntegerKeep ) + ( strFractionKeep === '' ? '' : '.' + strFractionKeep ) + ( strExponent === '' ? '' : 'e' + strExponent );
const chRoundUp = 0 <= numPrecisionAdjusted ? strFraction.substr( numPrecisionAdjusted, 1 ) : ( '0' + strInteger ).substr( numPrecisionAdjusted, 1 );
const bRoundUp = '5' <= chRoundUp && chRoundUp <= '9';
const numRoundUp = bRoundUp ? numSign * Math.pow( 10, -numPrecision ) : 0;
return Number.parseFloat( strRoundedDown ) + numRoundUp;
}
function safeRoundTest( numInput, numPrecision, strExpected ) {
const strActual = safeRound( numInput, numPrecision ).toString();
const bPassed = strActual === strExpected;
console.log( 'numInput', numInput, 'numPrecision', numPrecision, 'strExpected', strExpected, 'strActual', strActual, 'bPassed', bPassed );
return bPassed ? 0 : 1;
}
function safeRoundTests() {
let numFailed = 0;
numFailed += safeRoundTest( 0, 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '0', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '0.1', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+0.1', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-0.1', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '0.1', 1, '0.1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+0.1', 1, '0.1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-0.1', 1, '-0.1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '0.9', 0, '1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+0.9', 0, '1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-0.9', 0, '-1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '0.9', 1, '0.9' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+0.9', 1, '0.9' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-0.9', 1, '-0.9' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '0.5', 0, '1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+0.5', 0, '1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-0.5', 0, '-1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '0.4999', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+0.4999', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-0.4999', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '1.005', 2, '1.01' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '1.00499999999', 2, '1' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', -4, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', -3, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', -2, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', -1, '10' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', 0, '12' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', 1, '12.3' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', 2, '12.35' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', 3, '12.346' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', 4, '12.3456' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '012.3456', 5, '12.3456' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '12.', 0, '12' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '.12', 2, '0.12' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '0e0', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '1.2e3', 0, '1200' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '1.2e+3', 0, '1200' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '1.2e-3', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '1.2e-3', 3, '0.001' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '1.2e-3', 4, '0.0012' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '1.2e-3', 5, '0.0012' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+12.', 0, '12' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+.12', 2, '0.12' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+0e0', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+1.2e3', 0, '1200' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+1.2e+3', 0, '1200' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+1.2e-3', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+1.2e-3', 3, '0.001' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+1.2e-3', 4, '0.0012' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '+1.2e-3', 5, '0.0012' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-12.', 0, '-12' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-.12', 2, '-0.12' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-0e0', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-1.2e3', 0, '-1200' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-1.2e+3', 0, '-1200' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-1.2e-3', 0, '0' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-1.2e-3', 3, '-0.001' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-1.2e-3', 4, '-0.0012' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '-1.2e-3', 5, '-0.0012' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '9876.543e210', 0, '9.876543e+213' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '9876.543e210', -210, '9.877e+213' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '9876.543e210', -209, '9.8765e+213' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '9876.543e+210', 0, '9.876543e+213' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '9876.543e+210', -210, '9.877e+213' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '9876.543e+210', -209, '9.8765e+213' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '9876.543e-210', 213, '9.876543e-207' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '9876.543e-210', 210, '9.877e-207' );
numFailed += safeRoundTest( '9876.543e-210', 211, '9.8765e-207' );
console.log( 'numFailed', numFailed );
}
safeRoundTests();
这里找到的答案都不正确。臭柴塞曼要求四舍五入，但你们都四舍五进。
要进行汇总，请使用以下命令：
Math.ceil(num * 100)/100;
如果值是文本类型：
parseFloat("123.456").toFixed(2);
如果值是数字：
var numb = 123.23454;
numb = numb.toFixed(2);
有一个缺点，像1.5这样的值将给出“1.50”作为输出。@minitech建议的修复方法：
var numb = 1.5;
numb = +numb.toFixed(2);
// Note the plus sign that drops any "extra" zeroes at the end.
// It changes the result (which is a string) into a number again (think "0 + foo"),
// which means that it uses only as many digits as necessary.
Math.round似乎是一个更好的解决方案。但事实并非如此！在某些情况下，它不会正确舍入：
Math.round(1.005 * 100)/100 // Returns 1 instead of expected 1.01!
toFixed（）在某些情况下也不会正确舍入（在Chrome v.55.0.2883.87中测试）！
示例：
parseFloat("1.555").toFixed(2); // Returns 1.55 instead of 1.56.
parseFloat("1.5550").toFixed(2); // Returns 1.55 instead of 1.56.
// However, it will return correct result if you round 1.5551.
parseFloat("1.5551").toFixed(2); // Returns 1.56 as expected.
1.3555.toFixed(3) // Returns 1.355 instead of expected 1.356.
// However, it will return correct result if you round 1.35551.
1.35551.toFixed(2); // Returns 1.36 as expected.
我想，这是因为1.555实际上就像是幕后的浮球1.55499994。
解决方案1是使用具有所需舍入算法的脚本，例如：
function roundNumber(num, scale) {
if(!("" + num).includes("e")) {
return +(Math.round(num + "e+" + scale) + "e-" + scale);
} else {
var arr = ("" + num).split("e");
var sig = ""
if(+arr[1] + scale > 0) {
sig = "+";
}
return +(Math.round(+arr[0] + "e" + sig + (+arr[1] + scale)) + "e-" + scale);
}
}
它也在Plunker。
注意：这并不是每个人都能通用的解决方案。有几种不同的舍入算法。您的实现可能不同，这取决于您的需求。请参见舍入。
解决方案2是避免前端计算，并从后端服务器提取舍入值。
另一种可能的解决方案，也不是防弹的。
Math.round((num + Number.EPSILON) * 100) / 100
在某些情况下，当您舍入像1.3549999999999998这样的数字时，它将返回错误的结果。它应该是1.35，但结果是1.36。
根据所选答案和对同一问题的投票意见：
Math.round((num + 0.00001) * 100) / 100
这适用于以下两个示例：
Math.round((1.005 + 0.00001) * 100) / 100
Math.round((1.0049 + 0.00001) * 100) / 100
推荐文章
- Javascript和regex:分割字符串并保留分隔符
- 如何检查DST(日光节约时间)是否有效，如果是，偏移量?
- 如何打破_。在underscore.js中的每个函数
- 如何在jQuery中获得当前日期?
- 如何创建一个日期对象从字符串在javascript
- 输入触发器按钮单击
- 获取对象的属性名
- 如何检查用户是否可以回到浏览器历史
- 四舍五入到一个数字的最接近倍数
- 相当于字符串。jQuery格式
- 如何在vue-cli项目中更改端口号
- Angular 2模板中的标签是什么意思?
- JavaScript .includes()方法的多个条件
- 窗口。亲近与自我。close不关闭Chrome中的窗口
- 同步和异步编程(在node.js中)的区别是什么?
