另一种方法是简单地将命令与&&连接在一起，这样第一个失败的命令就会阻止其他命令的执行:

command1 &&
  command2 &&
  command3

这不是您在问题中要求的语法，但它是您所描述的用例的通用模式。一般来说，这些命令应该负责打印失败，这样您就不必手动执行了(当您不想要错误时，可以使用-q标志来屏蔽错误)。如果您有修改这些命令的能力，我会将它们编辑为在失败时大喊，而不是将它们包装在具有这种功能的其他东西中。

还要注意，你不需要这样做:

command1
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then

你可以简单地说:

if ! command1; then

当你确实需要检查返回码时，使用算术上下文而不是[…]- ne:

ret=$?
# do something
if (( ret != 0 )); then

您可以编写一个函数来启动和测试该命令。假设command1和command2是已设置为命令的环境变量。

function mytest {
    "$@"
    local status=$?
    if (( status != 0 )); then
        echo "error with $1" >&2
    fi
    return $status
}

mytest "$command1"
mytest "$command2"

我已经在bash中开发了一个几乎完美无缺的try & catch实现，它允许您编写如下代码:

try 
    echo 'Hello'
    false
    echo 'This will not be displayed'

catch 
    echo "Error in $__EXCEPTION_SOURCE__ at line: $__EXCEPTION_LINE__!"

您甚至可以将try-catch块嵌套在它们自己内部!

try {
    echo 'Hello'

    try {
        echo 'Nested Hello'
        false
        echo 'This will not execute'
    } catch {
        echo "Nested Caught (@ $__EXCEPTION_LINE__)"
    }

    false
    echo 'This will not execute too'

} catch {
    echo "Error in $__EXCEPTION_SOURCE__ at line: $__EXCEPTION_LINE__!"
}

代码是bash样板文件/框架的一部分。它进一步扩展了try & catch的思想，例如使用回溯和异常进行错误处理(以及其他一些不错的特性)。

下面是负责try & catch的代码:

set -o pipefail
shopt -s expand_aliases
declare -ig __oo__insideTryCatch=0

# if try-catch is nested, then set +e before so the parent handler doesn't catch us
alias try="[[ \$__oo__insideTryCatch -gt 0 ]] && set +e;
           __oo__insideTryCatch+=1; ( set -e;
           trap \"Exception.Capture \${LINENO}; \" ERR;"
alias catch=" ); Exception.Extract \$? || "

Exception.Capture() {
    local script="${BASH_SOURCE[1]#./}"

    if [[ ! -f /tmp/stored_exception_source ]]; then
        echo "$script" > /tmp/stored_exception_source
    fi
    if [[ ! -f /tmp/stored_exception_line ]]; then
        echo "$1" > /tmp/stored_exception_line
    fi
    return 0
}

Exception.Extract() {
    if [[ $__oo__insideTryCatch -gt 1 ]]
    then
        set -e
    fi

    __oo__insideTryCatch+=-1

    __EXCEPTION_CATCH__=( $(Exception.GetLastException) )

    local retVal=$1
    if [[ $retVal -gt 0 ]]
    then
        # BACKWARDS COMPATIBILE WAY:
        # export __EXCEPTION_SOURCE__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[(${#__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[@]}-1)]}"
        # export __EXCEPTION_LINE__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[(${#__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[@]}-2)]}"
        export __EXCEPTION_SOURCE__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[-1]}"
        export __EXCEPTION_LINE__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[-2]}"
        export __EXCEPTION__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[@]:0:(${#__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[@]} - 2)}"
        return 1 # so that we may continue with a "catch"
    fi
}

Exception.GetLastException() {
    if [[ -f /tmp/stored_exception ]] && [[ -f /tmp/stored_exception_line ]] && [[ -f /tmp/stored_exception_source ]]
    then
        cat /tmp/stored_exception
        cat /tmp/stored_exception_line
        cat /tmp/stored_exception_source
    else
        echo -e " \n${BASH_LINENO[1]}\n${BASH_SOURCE[2]#./}"
    fi

    rm -f /tmp/stored_exception /tmp/stored_exception_line /tmp/stored_exception_source
    return 0
}

你可以自由使用，分叉和贡献——它在GitHub上。

你说的“退出并回复错误”是什么意思?如果您的意思是希望脚本在任何命令失败时立即终止，那么就这样做

set -e    # DON'T do this.  See commentary below.

在脚本的开头(但注意下面的警告)。不要回显错误消息:让失败的命令处理它。换句话说，如果你这样做:

#!/bin/sh

set -e    # Use caution.  eg, don't do this
command1
command2
command3

而command2失败，同时打印一个错误消息到stderr，那么似乎您已经实现了您想要的。(除非我误解了你想要的!)

因此，您编写的任何命令都必须表现良好:它必须向stderr而不是stdout报告错误(问题中的示例代码将错误输出到stdout)，并且在失败时必须以非零状态退出。

However, I no longer consider this to be a good practice. set -e has changed its semantics with different versions of bash, and although it works fine for a simple script, there are so many edge cases that it is essentially unusable. (Consider things like: set -e; foo() { false; echo should not print; } ; foo && echo ok The semantics here are somewhat reasonable, but if you refactor code into a function that relied on the option setting to terminate early, you can easily get bitten.) IMO it is better to write:

 #!/bin/sh

 command1 || exit
 command2 || exit
 command3 || exit

or

#!/bin/sh

command1 && command2 && command3

run() {
  $*
  if [ $? -ne 0 ]
  then
    echo "$* failed with exit code $?"
    return 1
  else
    return 0
  fi
}

run command1 && run command2 && run command3

不管怎样，编写代码来检查每个命令是否成功的更简单的方法是:

command1 || echo "command1 borked it"
command2 || echo "command2 borked it"

它仍然很乏味，但至少是可读的。