我必须用sprintf格式化std::string，并将其发送到文件流。我该怎么做呢?
当前回答
更新1:增加了fmt::格式测试
我对这里介绍的方法进行了自己的研究，得到了与这里提到的完全相反的结果。
我用了4个函数/ 4个方法:
可变变量函数+ vsnprintf + std::unique_ptr 可变变量函数+ vsnprintf + std::string 可变变量模板函数+ std::ostringstream + std::tuple +实用程序::for_each 来自Fmt库的Fmt::format函数
对于googletest使用的测试后端。
#include <string>
#include <cstdarg>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <memory>
#include <algorithm>
#include <fmt/format.h>
inline std::string string_format(size_t string_reserve, const std::string fmt_str, ...)
{
size_t str_len = (std::max)(fmt_str.size(), string_reserve);
// plain buffer is a bit faster here than std::string::reserve
std::unique_ptr<char[]> formatted;
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, fmt_str);
while (true) {
formatted.reset(new char[str_len]);
const int final_n = vsnprintf(&formatted[0], str_len, fmt_str.c_str(), ap);
if (final_n < 0 || final_n >= int(str_len))
str_len += (std::abs)(final_n - int(str_len) + 1);
else
break;
}
va_end(ap);
return std::string(formatted.get());
}
inline std::string string_format2(size_t string_reserve, const std::string fmt_str, ...)
{
size_t str_len = (std::max)(fmt_str.size(), string_reserve);
std::string str;
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, fmt_str);
while (true) {
str.resize(str_len);
const int final_n = vsnprintf(const_cast<char *>(str.data()), str_len, fmt_str.c_str(), ap);
if (final_n < 0 || final_n >= int(str_len))
str_len += (std::abs)(final_n - int(str_len) + 1);
else {
str.resize(final_n); // do not forget to shrink the size!
break;
}
}
va_end(ap);
return str;
}
template <typename... Args>
inline std::string string_format3(size_t string_reserve, Args... args)
{
std::ostringstream ss;
if (string_reserve) {
ss.rdbuf()->str().reserve(string_reserve);
}
std::tuple<Args...> t{ args... };
utility::for_each(t, [&ss](auto & v)
{
ss << v;
});
return ss.str();
}
for_each实现从这里开始:遍历tuple
#include <type_traits>
#include <tuple>
namespace utility {
template <std::size_t I = 0, typename FuncT, typename... Tp>
inline typename std::enable_if<I == sizeof...(Tp), void>::type
for_each(std::tuple<Tp...> &, const FuncT &)
{
}
template<std::size_t I = 0, typename FuncT, typename... Tp>
inline typename std::enable_if<I < sizeof...(Tp), void>::type
for_each(std::tuple<Tp...> & t, const FuncT & f)
{
f(std::get<I>(t));
for_each<I + 1, FuncT, Tp...>(t, f);
}
}
测试:
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_0)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format(0, "%s+%u\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_256)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format(256, "%s+%u\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_std_string_0)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format2(0, "%s+%u\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_std_string_256)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format2(256, "%s+%u\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_0)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format3(0, "test test test", "+", 12345, "\n");
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_256)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format3(256, "test test test", "+", 12345, "\n");
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_0)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
std::ostringstream ss;
ss << "test test test" << "+" << 12345 << "\n";
const std::string v = ss.str();
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_256)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
std::ostringstream ss;
ss.rdbuf()->str().reserve(256);
ss << "test test test" << "+" << 12345 << "\n";
const std::string v = ss.str();
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_fmt_format_positional)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = fmt::format("{0:s}+{1:d}\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_fmt_format_named)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = fmt::format("{first:s}+{second:d}\n", fmt::arg("first", "test test test"), fmt::arg("second", 12345));
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR。
unsued.hpp:
#define UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(var) ::utility::unused_param(&var)
namespace utility {
extern const volatile void * volatile g_unused_param_storage_ptr;
extern void
#ifdef __GNUC__
__attribute__((optimize("O0")))
#endif
unused_param(const volatile void * p);
}
unused.cpp:
namespace utility {
const volatile void * volatile g_unused_param_storage_ptr = nullptr;
void
#ifdef __GNUC__
__attribute__((optimize("O0")))
#endif
unused_param(const volatile void * p)
{
g_unused_param_storage_ptr = p;
}
}
结果:
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_0
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_0 (556 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_256
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_256 (331 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_std_string_0
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_std_string_0 (457 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_std_string_256
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_std_string_256 (279 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_0
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_0 (1214 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_256
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_256 (1325 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_0
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_0 (1208 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_256
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_256 (1302 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_fmt_format_positional
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_fmt_format_positional (288 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_fmt_format_named
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_fmt_format_named (392 ms)
正如你所看到的，通过vsnprintf+std::string实现等于fmt::format，但比通过vsnprintf+std::unique_ptr更快，而vsnprintf+std::unique_ptr比通过std::ostringstream更快。
测试在Visual Studio 2015 Update 3中编译，运行于Windows 7 x64 / Intel酷睿i7-4820K CPU @ 3.70GHz / 16GB。
其他回答
对于Visual C:
std::wstring stringFormat(const wchar_t* fmt, ...)
{
if (!fmt) {
return L"";
}
std::vector<wchar_t> buff;
size_t size = wcslen(fmt) * 2;
buff.resize(size);
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, fmt);
while (true) {
int ret = _vsnwprintf_s(buff.data(), size, _TRUNCATE, fmt, ap);
if (ret != -1)
break;
else {
size *= 2;
buff.resize(size);
}
}
va_end(ap);
return std::wstring(buff.data());
}
更新1:增加了fmt::格式测试
我对这里介绍的方法进行了自己的研究，得到了与这里提到的完全相反的结果。
我用了4个函数/ 4个方法:
可变变量函数+ vsnprintf + std::unique_ptr 可变变量函数+ vsnprintf + std::string 可变变量模板函数+ std::ostringstream + std::tuple +实用程序::for_each 来自Fmt库的Fmt::format函数
对于googletest使用的测试后端。
#include <string>
#include <cstdarg>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <memory>
#include <algorithm>
#include <fmt/format.h>
inline std::string string_format(size_t string_reserve, const std::string fmt_str, ...)
{
size_t str_len = (std::max)(fmt_str.size(), string_reserve);
// plain buffer is a bit faster here than std::string::reserve
std::unique_ptr<char[]> formatted;
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, fmt_str);
while (true) {
formatted.reset(new char[str_len]);
const int final_n = vsnprintf(&formatted[0], str_len, fmt_str.c_str(), ap);
if (final_n < 0 || final_n >= int(str_len))
str_len += (std::abs)(final_n - int(str_len) + 1);
else
break;
}
va_end(ap);
return std::string(formatted.get());
}
inline std::string string_format2(size_t string_reserve, const std::string fmt_str, ...)
{
size_t str_len = (std::max)(fmt_str.size(), string_reserve);
std::string str;
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, fmt_str);
while (true) {
str.resize(str_len);
const int final_n = vsnprintf(const_cast<char *>(str.data()), str_len, fmt_str.c_str(), ap);
if (final_n < 0 || final_n >= int(str_len))
str_len += (std::abs)(final_n - int(str_len) + 1);
else {
str.resize(final_n); // do not forget to shrink the size!
break;
}
}
va_end(ap);
return str;
}
template <typename... Args>
inline std::string string_format3(size_t string_reserve, Args... args)
{
std::ostringstream ss;
if (string_reserve) {
ss.rdbuf()->str().reserve(string_reserve);
}
std::tuple<Args...> t{ args... };
utility::for_each(t, [&ss](auto & v)
{
ss << v;
});
return ss.str();
}
for_each实现从这里开始:遍历tuple
#include <type_traits>
#include <tuple>
namespace utility {
template <std::size_t I = 0, typename FuncT, typename... Tp>
inline typename std::enable_if<I == sizeof...(Tp), void>::type
for_each(std::tuple<Tp...> &, const FuncT &)
{
}
template<std::size_t I = 0, typename FuncT, typename... Tp>
inline typename std::enable_if<I < sizeof...(Tp), void>::type
for_each(std::tuple<Tp...> & t, const FuncT & f)
{
f(std::get<I>(t));
for_each<I + 1, FuncT, Tp...>(t, f);
}
}
测试:
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_0)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format(0, "%s+%u\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_256)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format(256, "%s+%u\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_std_string_0)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format2(0, "%s+%u\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_std_string_256)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format2(256, "%s+%u\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_0)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format3(0, "test test test", "+", 12345, "\n");
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_256)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = string_format3(256, "test test test", "+", 12345, "\n");
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_0)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
std::ostringstream ss;
ss << "test test test" << "+" << 12345 << "\n";
const std::string v = ss.str();
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_256)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
std::ostringstream ss;
ss.rdbuf()->str().reserve(256);
ss << "test test test" << "+" << 12345 << "\n";
const std::string v = ss.str();
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_fmt_format_positional)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = fmt::format("{0:s}+{1:d}\n", "test test test", 12345);
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
TEST(ExternalFuncs, test_fmt_format_named)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
const std::string v = fmt::format("{first:s}+{second:d}\n", fmt::arg("first", "test test test"), fmt::arg("second", 12345));
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(v);
}
}
UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR。
unsued.hpp:
#define UTILITY_SUPPRESS_OPTIMIZATION_ON_VAR(var) ::utility::unused_param(&var)
namespace utility {
extern const volatile void * volatile g_unused_param_storage_ptr;
extern void
#ifdef __GNUC__
__attribute__((optimize("O0")))
#endif
unused_param(const volatile void * p);
}
unused.cpp:
namespace utility {
const volatile void * volatile g_unused_param_storage_ptr = nullptr;
void
#ifdef __GNUC__
__attribute__((optimize("O0")))
#endif
unused_param(const volatile void * p)
{
g_unused_param_storage_ptr = p;
}
}
结果:
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_0
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_0 (556 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_256
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_unique_ptr_256 (331 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_std_string_0
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_std_string_0 (457 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_std_string_256
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_std_string_256 (279 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_0
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_0 (1214 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_256
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_on_variadic_tuple_256 (1325 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_0
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_0 (1208 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_256
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_string_format_on_string_stream_inline_256 (1302 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_fmt_format_positional
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_fmt_format_positional (288 ms)
[ RUN ] ExternalFuncs.test_fmt_format_named
[ OK ] ExternalFuncs.test_fmt_format_named (392 ms)
正如你所看到的，通过vsnprintf+std::string实现等于fmt::format，但比通过vsnprintf+std::unique_ptr更快，而vsnprintf+std::unique_ptr比通过std::ostringstream更快。
测试在Visual Studio 2015 Update 3中编译，运行于Windows 7 x64 / Intel酷睿i7-4820K CPU @ 3.70GHz / 16GB。
这个问题已经解决了。但是，我认为这是c++中格式化字符串的另一种方式
class string_format {
private:
std::string _result;
public:
string_format( ) { }
~string_format( ) { std::string( ).swap( _result ); }
const std::string& get_data( ) const { return _result; }
template<typename T, typename... Targs>
void format( const char* fmt, T value, Targs... Fargs ) {
for ( ; *fmt != '\0'; fmt++ ) {
if ( *fmt == '%' ) {
_result += value;
this->format( fmt + 1, Fargs..., 0 ); // recursive call
return;
}
_result += *fmt;
}
}
friend std::ostream& operator<<( std::ostream& ostream, const string_format& inst );
};
inline std::string& operator+=( std::string& str, int val ) {
str.append( std::to_string( val ) );
return str;
}
inline std::string& operator+=( std::string& str, double val ) {
str.append( std::to_string( val ) );
return str;
}
inline std::string& operator+=( std::string& str, bool val ) {
str.append( val ? "true" : "false" );
return str;
}
inline std::ostream& operator<<( std::ostream& ostream, const string_format& inst ) {
ostream << inst.get_data( );
return ostream;
}
并测试这个类:
string_format fmt;
fmt.format( "Hello % and is working ? Ans: %", "world", true );
std::cout << fmt;
你可以在这里查一下
我现在将为Visual Studio编写版本，希望有一天有人会让它变得可移植。(怀疑需要用vsnwprintf替换_vsnwprintf之类的东西。)
您需要使用项目配置中的define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS来禁用已弃用的警告。
我使用_vsnwprintf与第一个参数作为nullptr能够估计缓冲区大小，保留wstring缓冲区，然后格式化字符串直接到缓冲区。
不确定为什么需要禁用已弃用警告，因为相同方法调用(_vsnwprintf_s)的安全版本不能使用nullptr作为输入。怀疑需要报告给微软c++团队。
这个版本应该同时使用- string类或wstring类。
如果你发现任何错误或不一致，请再问一次，我会尽力修复它。
stringHelpers.h:
#pragma once
#include <string>
//
// Formats string/wstring according to format, if formatting fails (e.g. invalid %s pointer - returns empty string)
//
template <typename T>
std::basic_string<T> sFormat(const T* format, ...)
{
va_list args;
va_start(args, format);
int size;
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<T, char>)
size = vsnprintf(nullptr, 0, format, args);
else
size = _vsnwprintf(nullptr, 0, format, args);
size++; // Zero termination
std::basic_string<T> s;
s.resize(size);
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<T, char>)
vsnprintf(&s[0], size, format, args);
else
_vsnwprintf(&s[0], size, format, args);
va_end(args);
return s;
}
以上是代码示例，可以复制。我将维护工作版本在我自己的仓库在github:
https://github.com/tapika/cppscriptcore/blob/master/SolutionProjectModel/helpers.h#L12
String没有你需要的东西，但是std::stringstream有。使用stringstream创建字符串，然后提取字符串。这里有一个关于你可以做的事情的全面列表。例如:
cout.setprecision(10); //stringstream is a stream like cout
将在打印双精度或浮点数时提供10位小数点后的精度。
推荐文章
- decltype(auto)的一些用途是什么?
- Shared_ptr转换为数组:应该使用它吗?
- Printf与std::字符串?
- 禁用复制构造函数
- 不区分大小写的“in”
- 我如何得到一个字符串的前n个字符而不检查大小或出界?
- 只接受特定类型的c++模板
- 如何在PHP中截断字符串最接近于一定数量的字符?
- c#和Java中的泛型有什么不同?和模板在c++ ?
- Ruby数组到字符串的转换
- c++ 11中的递归lambda函数
- 在c++中指针使用NULL或0(零)吗?
- 为什么在Java和。net中不能修改字符串?
- 在c++中，如何将int值附加到字符串中?
- 如何创建一个日期对象从字符串在javascript
