我有一些单元测试,期望“当前时间”与DateTime不同。显然,我不想改变电脑的时间。
实现这一目标的最佳策略是什么?
我有一些单元测试,期望“当前时间”与DateTime不同。显然,我不想改变电脑的时间。
实现这一目标的最佳策略是什么?
当前回答
最好的策略是将当前时间封装在一个抽象中,并将该抽象注入到使用者中。
或者,你也可以将时间抽象定义为环境上下文:
public abstract class TimeProvider
{
private static TimeProvider current =
DefaultTimeProvider.Instance;
public static TimeProvider Current
{
get { return TimeProvider.current; }
set
{
if (value == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("value");
}
TimeProvider.current = value;
}
}
public abstract DateTime UtcNow { get; }
public static void ResetToDefault()
{
TimeProvider.current = DefaultTimeProvider.Instance;
}
}
这将使你能够像这样消费它:
var now = TimeProvider.Current.UtcNow;
在单元测试中,您可以替换TimeProvider。当前带有Test Double/Mock对象。使用Moq的例子:
var timeMock = new Mock<TimeProvider>();
timeMock.SetupGet(tp => tp.UtcNow).Returns(new DateTime(2010, 3, 11));
TimeProvider.Current = timeMock.Object;
但是,当使用静态状态进行单元测试时,始终记得通过调用TimeProvider.ResetToDefault()来删除fixture。
其他回答
以下是我对这个问题的回答。我将“环境上下文”模式与IDisposable结合起来。你可以使用DateTimeProvider。当前在您的正常程序代码和测试中,您使用using语句覆盖范围。
using System;
using System.Collections.Immutable;
namespace ambientcontext {
public abstract class DateTimeProvider : IDisposable
{
private static ImmutableStack<DateTimeProvider> stack = ImmutableStack<DateTimeProvider>.Empty.Push(new DefaultDateTimeProvider());
protected DateTimeProvider()
{
if (this.GetType() != typeof(DefaultDateTimeProvider))
stack = stack.Push(this);
}
public static DateTimeProvider Current => stack.Peek();
public abstract DateTime Today { get; }
public abstract DateTime Now {get; }
public void Dispose()
{
if (this.GetType() != typeof(DefaultDateTimeProvider))
stack = stack.Pop();
}
// Not visible Default Implementation
private class DefaultDateTimeProvider : DateTimeProvider {
public override DateTime Today => DateTime.Today;
public override DateTime Now => DateTime.Now;
}
}
}
下面是如何在单元测试中使用上述DateTimeProvider
using System;
using Xunit;
namespace ambientcontext
{
public class TestDateTimeProvider
{
[Fact]
public void TestDateTime()
{
var actual = DateTimeProvider.Current.Today;
var expected = DateTime.Today;
Assert.Equal<DateTime>(expected, actual);
using (new MyDateTimeProvider(new DateTime(2012,12,21)))
{
Assert.Equal(2012, DateTimeProvider.Current.Today.Year);
using (new MyDateTimeProvider(new DateTime(1984,4,4)))
{
Assert.Equal(1984, DateTimeProvider.Current.Today.Year);
}
Assert.Equal(2012, DateTimeProvider.Current.Today.Year);
}
// Fall-Back to Default DateTimeProvider
Assert.Equal<int>(expected.Year, DateTimeProvider.Current.Today.Year);
}
private class MyDateTimeProvider : DateTimeProvider
{
private readonly DateTime dateTime;
public MyDateTimeProvider(DateTime dateTime):base()
{
this.dateTime = dateTime;
}
public override DateTime Today => this.dateTime.Date;
public override DateTime Now => this.dateTime;
}
}
}
为系统添加一个假程序集(右键单击System reference=>添加假程序集)。
并在测试方法中写入:
using (ShimsContext.Create())
{
System.Fakes.ShimDateTime.NowGet = () => new DateTime(2014, 3, 10);
MethodThatUsesDateTimeNow();
}
下面的代码为我工作:
bizDeedMock.Verify(p => p.SetDeed(It.Is<DsPostList>(x => x.PostLists[0].registerDate.Year == DateTime.Now.Year)));
bizDeedMock.Verify(p => p.SetDeed(It.Is<DsPostList>(x => x.PostLists[0].registerDate.Month == DateTime.Now.Month)));
bizDeedMock.Verify(p => p.SetDeed(It.Is<DsPostList>(x => x.PostLists[0].registerDate.Day == DateTime.Now.Day)));
我们使用的是静态SystemTime对象,但是在运行并行单元测试时遇到了问题。我尝试使用Henk van Boeijen的解决方案,但在派生异步线程上有问题,最终以类似于下面的方式使用AsyncLocal:
public static class Clock
{
private static Func<DateTime> _utcNow = () => DateTime.UtcNow;
static AsyncLocal<Func<DateTime>> _override = new AsyncLocal<Func<DateTime>>();
public static DateTime UtcNow => (_override.Value ?? _utcNow)();
public static void Set(Func<DateTime> func)
{
_override.Value = func;
}
public static void Reset()
{
_override.Value = null;
}
}
来源:https://gist.github.com/CraftyFella/42f459f7687b0b8b268fc311e6b4af08
摩尔数:
[Test]
public void TestOfDateTime()
{
var firstValue = DateTime.Now;
MDateTime.NowGet = () => new DateTime(2000,1,1);
var secondValue = DateTime.Now;
Assert(firstValue > secondValue); // would be false if 'moleing' failed
}
免责声明-我工作的鼹鼠