在听StackOverflow播客的时候,经常有人说“真正的程序员”是用C语言编写的,而C语言的速度要快得多,因为它“接近机器”。把前面的断言留到另一篇文章,C有什么特别之处,使它比其他语言更快?或者换句话说:什么能阻止其他语言编译成二进制代码,使其运行速度与C语言一样快?
当前回答
The lack of abstraction is what makes C faster. If you write an output statement you know exactly what is happening. If you write an output statement in java it is getting compiled to a class file which then gets run on a virtual machine introducing a layor of abstraction. The lack of object oriented features as a part of the language also increases it's speed do to less code being generated. If you use C as an object oriented language then you are doing all the coding for things such as classes, inharitence, etc. This means rather then make something generalized enough for everyone with the amount of code and the performance penelty that requires you only write what you need to get the job done.
其他回答
我猜你忘了汇编语言也是一种语言:)
但是说真的,只有当程序员知道自己在做什么的时候,C程序才会更快。你可以很容易地编写一个C程序,它比用其他语言编写的程序运行得更慢。
C语言之所以更快,是因为它就是这样设计的。它允许你做很多“低级”的事情,帮助编译器优化代码。或者,我们可以说,你程序员负责优化代码。但这通常相当棘手,而且容易出错。
其他语言,就像前面提到的其他语言一样,更关注程序员的生产力。人们普遍认为程序员的时间比机器的时间要昂贵得多(即使在过去)。因此,尽量减少程序员花在编写和调试程序上的时间,而不是减少程序的运行时间,是很有意义的。为了做到这一点,您将牺牲一些可以使程序更快的事情,因为许多事情都是自动化的。
这不是语言的问题,而是工具和库的问题。C语言可用的库和编译器比新语言要老得多。你可能认为这会让它们变慢,但事实恰恰相反。
这些库是在处理能力和内存非常重要的时候编写的。它们必须写得非常高效,才能发挥作用。C编译器的开发人员也花了很长时间为不同的处理器进行各种巧妙的优化。C语言的成熟和广泛采用使得它比同时期的其他语言具有显著的优势。它还使C语言在速度上比那些不像C语言那样强调原始性能的新工具更有优势。
我知道很多人都说过这句话,但是:
C更快,因为它(为你)做的更少。
这实际上是一个长期存在的谎言。虽然C程序确实经常更快,但情况并非总是如此,特别是当C程序员不太擅长它的时候。
人们往往会忘记的一个明显的漏洞是,当程序必须为某种IO阻塞时,比如任何GUI程序中的用户输入。在这些情况下,使用什么语言并不重要,因为您受到数据传入速度的限制,而不是处理数据的速度。在这种情况下,不管你使用的是C、Java、c#甚至Perl;你不能比数据进入的速度更快。
The other major thing is that using garbage collection and not using proper pointers allows the virtual machine to make a number of optimizations not available in other languages. For instance, the JVM is capable of moving objects around on the heap to defragment it. This makes future allocations much faster since the next index can simply be used rather than looking it up in a table. Modern JVMs also don't have to actually deallocate memory; instead, they just move the live objects around when they GC and the spent memory from the dead objects is recovered essentially for free.
This also brings up an interesting point about C and even more so in C++. There is something of a design philosophy of "If you don't need it, you don't pay for it." The problem is that if you do want it, you end up paying through the nose for it. For instance, the vtable implementation in Java tends to be a lot better than C++ implementations, so virtual function calls are a lot faster. On the other hand, you have no choice but to use virtual functions in Java and they still cost something, but in programs that use a lot of virtual functions, the reduced cost adds up.
The lack of abstraction is what makes C faster. If you write an output statement you know exactly what is happening. If you write an output statement in java it is getting compiled to a class file which then gets run on a virtual machine introducing a layor of abstraction. The lack of object oriented features as a part of the language also increases it's speed do to less code being generated. If you use C as an object oriented language then you are doing all the coding for things such as classes, inharitence, etc. This means rather then make something generalized enough for everyone with the amount of code and the performance penelty that requires you only write what you need to get the job done.