在我的情况下，我发现在myContext.SaveChangesAsync()调用之前缺少“await”语句。在这些异步调用之前添加await，为我解决了数据读取器的问题。

通过向构造函数中添加选项，我轻松地(实用地)解决了这个问题。因此，我只在需要时使用它。

public class Something : DbContext
{
    public Something(bool MultipleActiveResultSets = false)
    {
        this.Database
            .Connection
            .ConnectionString = Shared.ConnectionString /* your connection string */
                              + (MultipleActiveResultSets ? ";MultipleActiveResultSets=true;" : "");
    }
...

It is not about closing connection. EF manages connection correctly. My understanding of this problem is that there are multiple data retrieval commands executed on single connection (or single command with multiple selects) while next DataReader is executed before first one has completed the reading. The only way to avoid the exception is to allow multiple nested DataReaders = turn on MultipleActiveResultSets. Another scenario when this always happens is when you iterate through result of the query (IQueryable) and you will trigger lazy loading for loaded entity inside the iteration.

你得到这个错误，当你试图迭代的集合是一种惰性加载(iquerible)。

foreach (var user in _dbContext.Users)
{    
}

将iquerible集合转换为其他可枚举集合将解决这个问题。 例子

_dbContext.Users.ToList()

注意:. tolist()每次都会创建一个新的集合，如果你在处理大数据，它会导致性能问题。

这个问题可以简单地通过将数据转换为列表来解决

 var details = _webcontext.products.ToList();


            if (details != null)
            {
                Parallel.ForEach(details, x =>
                {
                    Products obj = new Products();
                    obj.slno = x.slno;
                    obj.ProductName = x.ProductName;
                    obj.Price = Convert.ToInt32(x.Price);
                    li.Add(obj);

                });
                return li;
            }

在第二次查询之前，我使用以下代码段解决了这个问题:

 ...first query
 while (_dbContext.Connection.State != System.Data.ConnectionState.Closed)
 {
     System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(500);
 }
 ...second query

您可以以毫秒为单位更改睡眠时间

P.D.在使用线程时很有用