在Kotlin中使用这种结构是个好主意

companion object Run {
   fun after(delay: Long, process: () -> Unit) {
      Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).postDelayed({
          process()
      }, delay)
   }
}

稍后称为

Run.after(SPLASH_TIME_OUT) {
   val action = SplashFragmentDirections.actionSplashFragmentToLogin()
   v.findNavController().navigate(action)
}

被弃用的函数是Handler的构造函数。请改用Handler(loop . mylooper ()) .postDelayed(runnable, delay)

考虑使用协程

scope.launch {
    delay(3000L)
    // do stuff
}

我有三个解决方案:

显式地指定Looper: 处理程序(Looper.getMainLooper ()) .postDelayed ({ / /代码 },持续时间) 指定隐式线程本地行为: 处理程序(Looper.myLooper () ! !) .postDelayed ({ / /代码 },持续时间) 使用线程: 线程({ 尝试{ thread . sleep (3000) } catch (e:异常){ 把e ｝ / /代码 }).start ()

根据文档(https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/Handler#Handler()):

Implicitly choosing a Looper during Handler construction can lead to bugs where operations are silently lost (if the Handler is not expecting new tasks and quits), crashes (if a handler is sometimes created on a thread without a Looper active), or race conditions, where the thread a handler is associated with is not what the author anticipated. Instead, use an Executor or specify the Looper explicitly, using Looper#getMainLooper, {link android.view.View#getHandler}, or similar. If the implicit thread local behavior is required for compatibility, use new Handler(Looper.myLooper()) to make it clear to readers.

我们应该停止使用没有Looper的构造函数，而是指定一个Looper。

使用生命周期范围会更容易。内部活动或片段。

 lifecycleScope.launch {
     delay(2000)
     // Do your stuff
 }

或者使用处理器

        Handler(Looper.myLooper()!!)