考虑到这段代码,我能绝对确定finally块总是执行的吗,不管something()是什么?
try {
something();
return success;
}
catch (Exception e) {
return failure;
}
finally {
System.out.println("I don't know if this will get printed out");
}
考虑到这段代码,我能绝对确定finally块总是执行的吗,不管something()是什么?
try {
something();
return success;
}
catch (Exception e) {
return failure;
}
finally {
System.out.println("I don't know if this will get printed out");
}
当前回答
除其他响应外,重要的是要指出,“finally”有权通过try重写任何异常/返回值。。捕捉块。例如,以下代码返回12:
public static int getMonthsInYear() {
try {
return 10;
}
finally {
return 12;
}
}
类似地,以下方法不会引发异常:
public static int getMonthsInYear() {
try {
throw new RuntimeException();
}
finally {
return 12;
}
}
虽然以下方法确实抛出了它:
public static int getMonthsInYear() {
try {
return 12;
}
finally {
throw new RuntimeException();
}
}
其他回答
是的,会的。唯一不会发生的情况是JVM退出或崩溃
我试过了,它是单线程的。
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
Object obj = new Object();
try {
synchronized (obj) {
obj.wait();
System.out.println("after wait()");
}
} catch (Exception ignored) {
} finally {
System.out.println("finally");
}
}
主线程将永远处于等待状态,因此最终不会被调用,
因此控制台输出不会在wait()或finally之后打印String:
同意@Stephen C的观点,上述示例是这里提到的第三个案例之一:
在以下代码中添加更多这样的无限循环可能性:
// import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
// Thread.sleep(Long.MAX_VALUE);
// Thread.currentThread().join();
// new Semaphore(0).acquire();
// while (true){}
System.out.println("after sleep join semaphore exit infinite while loop");
} catch (Exception ignored) {
} finally {
System.out.println("finally");
}
}
案例2:如果JVM首先崩溃
import sun.misc.Unsafe;
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
public static void main(String args[]) {
try {
unsafeMethod();
//Runtime.getRuntime().halt(123);
System.out.println("After Jvm Crash!");
} catch (Exception e) {
} finally {
System.out.println("finally");
}
}
private static void unsafeMethod() throws NoSuchFieldException, IllegalAccessException {
Field f = Unsafe.class.getDeclaredField("theUnsafe");
f.setAccessible(true);
Unsafe unsafe = (Unsafe) f.get(null);
unsafe.putAddress(0, 0);
}
参考:如何使JVM崩溃?
情况6:如果finally块将由守护程序线程执行,并且所有其他非守护程序线程在finally被调用之前退出。
public static void main(String args[]) {
Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
printThreads("Daemon Thread printing");
// just to ensure this thread will live longer than main thread
Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (Exception e) {
} finally {
System.out.println("finally");
}
}
};
Thread daemonThread = new Thread(runnable);
daemonThread.setDaemon(Boolean.TRUE);
daemonThread.setName("My Daemon Thread");
daemonThread.start();
printThreads("main Thread Printing");
}
private static synchronized void printThreads(String str) {
System.out.println(str);
int threadCount = 0;
Set<Thread> threadSet = Thread.getAllStackTraces().keySet();
for (Thread t : threadSet) {
if (t.getThreadGroup() == Thread.currentThread().getThreadGroup()) {
System.out.println("Thread :" + t + ":" + "state:" + t.getState());
++threadCount;
}
}
System.out.println("Thread count started by Main thread:" + threadCount);
System.out.println("-------------------------------------------------");
}
输出:这不会打印“finally”,这意味着“守护进程线程”中的“finally块”没有执行
主螺纹打印线程:线程[My Daemon线程,5,main]:状态:BLOCKED线程:线程[main,5,main]:状态:RUNNABLE线程:线程[Monitor Ctrl-Break,5,main]:状态:RUNNABLE主线程启动的线程计数:3------------------------------------------------- Daemon线程打印线程:线程[My Daemon线程,5,main]:状态:RUNNABLE线程:线程[Monitor Ctrl-Break,5,main]:状态:RUNNABLE主线程启动的线程计数:2------------------------------------------------- 进程已完成,退出代码为0
试用间苯二酚示例
static class IamAutoCloseable implements AutoCloseable {
private final String name;
IamAutoCloseable(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public void close() {
System.out.println(name);
}
}
@Test
public void withResourceFinally() {
try (IamAutoCloseable closeable1 = new IamAutoCloseable("closeable1");
IamAutoCloseable closeable2 = new IamAutoCloseable("closeable2")) {
System.out.println("try");
} finally {
System.out.println("finally");
}
}
测试输出:
try
closeable2
closeable1
finally
这是因为您将i的值指定为12,但没有将i的返回给函数。正确的代码如下:
public static int test() {
int i = 0;
try {
return i;
} finally {
i = 12;
System.out.println("finally trumps return.");
return i;
}
}
公认的答案在几乎所有方面都是正确的,但它仍然只是事实的一半(好吧,95%的事实)。
假设以下代码:
private final Lock m_Lock = new ReentrantLock();
…
public final SomeObject doSomething( final SomeObject arg )
{
final SomeObject retValue;
try
{
lock.lock();
retValue = SomeObject( arg );
}
finally
{
out.println( "Entering finally block");
callingAnotherMethod( arg, retValue );
lock.unlock();
}
return retValue;
}
…
try
{
final var result = doSomething( new SomeObject() );
}
catch( final StackOverflowError e ) { /* Deliberately ignored */ }
调用doSomething()方法将几乎立即导致StackOverflowError。
锁也不会松开!
但是,当finally块总是被执行时(接受的答案中已经列出了例外情况),这怎么会发生呢?
这是因为不能保证finally块中的所有语句都真正执行!
如果在调用lock.unlock()之前调用System.exit()或throws语句,这将是显而易见的。
但示例代码中没有类似的内容…
除此之外,调用lock.unlock()之前finally块中的另外两个方法调用将导致另一个StackOverflowError…
瞧,锁没有松开!
虽然这样的示例代码很愚蠢,但在许多类型的软件中都可以找到类似的模式。只要最后一个街区没有发生什么丑恶的事情,一切都会好起来的…
有趣的事实是,它在Java的更高版本中不起作用(这意味着在更高的版本中,锁被释放了…)。不知道何时以及为什么会发生变化。
但您仍然必须确保finally块始终正常终止,否则它是否始终被执行可能无关紧要…