我真的很喜欢Shavais的帖子，但我又添加了一个测试用例(&内置的isdigit()函数):

def isInt_loop(v):
    v = str(v).strip()
    # swapping '0123456789' for '9876543210' makes nominal difference (might have because '1' is toward the beginning of the string)
    numbers = '0123456789'
    for i in v:
        if i not in numbers:
            return False
    return True

def isInt_Digit(v):
    v = str(v).strip()
    return v.isdigit()

而且它一直明显优于其他时代:

timings..
isInt_try:   0.4628
isInt_str:   0.3556
isInt_re:    0.4889
isInt_re2:   0.2726
isInt_loop:   0.1842
isInt_Digit:   0.1577

使用普通2.7 python:

$ python --version
Python 2.7.10

我添加的两个测试用例(isInt_loop和isInt_digit)都通过了完全相同的测试用例(它们都只接受无符号整数)，但我认为人们可以更聪明地修改字符串实现(isInt_loop)而不是内置的isdigit()函数，所以我包括了它，尽管执行时间略有不同。(这两种方法都比其他方法好很多，但没有处理额外的东西:“。/ + / -)

此外，我发现有趣的是，regex (isInt_re2方法)在2012年(目前是2018年)由Shavais执行的相同测试中击败了字符串比较。也许正则表达式库已经改进了?

如果你真的不喜欢到处使用try/except，请写一个helper函数:

def represents_int(s):
    try: 
        int(s)
    except ValueError:
        return False
    else:
        return True

>>> print(represents_int("+123"))
True
>>> print(represents_int("10.0"))
False

它将需要更多的代码来精确覆盖Python认为是整数的所有字符串。要我说，你就用蟒语吧。

Greg Hewgill的方法缺少了几个组件:前导的“^”只匹配字符串的开头，并且预先编译re。但是这种方法可以让你避免尝试:

import re
INT_RE = re.compile(r"^[-]?\d+$")
def RepresentsInt(s):
    return INT_RE.match(str(s)) is not None

我很感兴趣为什么你试图避免尝试:除了?

>>> "+7".lstrip("-+").isdigit()
True
>>> "-7".lstrip("-+").isdigit()
True
>>> "7".lstrip("-+").isdigit()
True
>>> "13.4".lstrip("-+").isdigit()
False

所以你的函数是

def is_int(val):
   return val.lstrip("-+").isdigit()

我的建议如下:

import ast

def is_int(s):
    return isinstance(ast.literal_eval(s), int)

从文档中可以看出:

安全地计算表达式节点或包含Python文字或容器显示的字符串。提供的字符串或节点只能由以下Python文字结构组成:字符串、字节、数字、元组、列表、字典、集、布尔值和None。

我应该指出，当对任何不构成Python文字的内容调用时，这将引发ValueError异常。因为这个问题要求一个没有try/except的解决方案，我有一个Kobayashi-Maru类型的解决方案:

from ast import literal_eval
from contextlib import suppress

def is_int(s):
    with suppress(ValueError):
        return isinstance(literal_eval(s), int)
    return False

¯\_(五)_/¯

正确的RegEx解决方案应该结合Greg Hewgill和Nowell的思想，但不使用全局变量。可以通过将属性附加到方法来实现这一点。另外，我知道在方法中导入是不受欢迎的，但我想要的是像http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/Importing#lazy-imports这样的“惰性模块”效果

edit:到目前为止，我最喜欢的技术是使用String对象的独占方法。

#!/usr/bin/env python

# Uses exclusively methods of the String object
def isInteger(i):
    i = str(i)
    return i=='0' or (i if i.find('..') > -1 else i.lstrip('-+').rstrip('0').rstrip('.')).isdigit()

# Uses re module for regex
def isIntegre(i):
    import re
    if not hasattr(isIntegre, '_re'):
        print("I compile only once. Remove this line when you are confident in that.")
        isIntegre._re = re.compile(r"[-+]?\d+(\.0*)?$")
    return isIntegre._re.match(str(i)) is not None

# When executed directly run Unit Tests
if __name__ == '__main__':
    for obj in [
                # integers
                0, 1, -1, 1.0, -1.0,
                '0', '0.','0.0', '1', '-1', '+1', '1.0', '-1.0', '+1.0',
                # non-integers
                1.1, -1.1, '1.1', '-1.1', '+1.1',
                '1.1.1', '1.1.0', '1.0.1', '1.0.0',
                '1.0.', '1..0', '1..',
                '0.0.', '0..0', '0..',
                'one', object(), (1,2,3), [1,2,3], {'one':'two'}
            ]:
        # Notice the integre uses 're' (intended to be humorous)
        integer = ('an integer' if isInteger(obj) else 'NOT an integer')
        integre = ('an integre' if isIntegre(obj) else 'NOT an integre')
        # Make strings look like strings in the output
        if isinstance(obj, str):
            obj = ("'%s'" % (obj,))
        print("%30s is %14s is %14s" % (obj, integer, integre))

对于那些不太喜欢冒险的同学，输出如下:

I compile only once. Remove this line when you are confident in that.
                             0 is     an integer is     an integre
                             1 is     an integer is     an integre
                            -1 is     an integer is     an integre
                           1.0 is     an integer is     an integre
                          -1.0 is     an integer is     an integre
                           '0' is     an integer is     an integre
                          '0.' is     an integer is     an integre
                         '0.0' is     an integer is     an integre
                           '1' is     an integer is     an integre
                          '-1' is     an integer is     an integre
                          '+1' is     an integer is     an integre
                         '1.0' is     an integer is     an integre
                        '-1.0' is     an integer is     an integre
                        '+1.0' is     an integer is     an integre
                           1.1 is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                          -1.1 is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                         '1.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '-1.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '+1.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                       '1.1.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                       '1.1.0' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                       '1.0.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                       '1.0.0' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '1.0.' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '1..0' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                         '1..' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '0.0.' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '0..0' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                         '0..' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                         'one' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
<object object at 0x103b7d0a0> is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                     (1, 2, 3) is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                     [1, 2, 3] is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                {'one': 'two'} is NOT an integer is NOT an integre