我通常至少有3个远程分支:master、staging和production。我有3个本地分支来跟踪这些远程分支。

更新我所有的本地分支是乏味的:

git fetch --all
git rebase origin/master
git checkout staging
git rebase origin/staging
git checkout production
git rebase origin/production

我很想做一个“git pull -all”,但我还没能让它工作。它似乎做了一个“fetch -all”,然后更新(快进或合并)当前工作的分支,但不包括其他本地分支。

我仍然需要手动切换到每个本地分支并进行更新。


当前回答

我知道这个问题已经提了将近3年了,但我也问过自己同样的问题,但没有找到任何现成的解决方案。所以,我自己创建了一个自定义的git命令shell脚本。

在这里,git-ffwd-update脚本执行以下操作…

it issues a git remote update to fetch the lates revs then uses git remote show to get a list of local branches that track a remote branch (e.g. branches that can be used with git pull) then it checks with git rev-list --count <REMOTE_BRANCH>..<LOCAL_BRANCH> how many commit the local branch is behind the remote (and ahead vice versa) if the local branch is 1 or more commits ahead, it can NOT be fast-forwarded and needs to be merged or rebased by hand if the local branch is 0 commits ahead and 1 or more commits behind, it can be fast-forwarded by git branch -f <LOCAL_BRANCH> -t <REMOTE_BRANCH>

脚本可以这样调用:

$ git ffwd-update
Fetching origin
 branch bigcouch was 10 commit(s) behind of origin/bigcouch. resetting local branch to remote
 branch develop was 3 commit(s) behind of origin/develop. resetting local branch to remote
 branch master is 6 commit(s) behind and 1 commit(s) ahead of origin/master. could not be fast-forwarded

完整的脚本应该保存为git-ffwd-update,并且需要在PATH上。

#!/bin/bash

main() {
  REMOTES="$@";
  if [ -z "$REMOTES" ]; then
    REMOTES=$(git remote);
  fi
  REMOTES=$(echo "$REMOTES" | xargs -n1 echo)
  CLB=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD);
  echo "$REMOTES" | while read REMOTE; do
    git remote update $REMOTE
    git remote show $REMOTE -n \
    | awk '/merges with remote/{print $5" "$1}' \
    | while read RB LB; do
      ARB="refs/remotes/$REMOTE/$RB";
      ALB="refs/heads/$LB";
      NBEHIND=$(( $(git rev-list --count $ALB..$ARB 2>/dev/null) +0));
      NAHEAD=$(( $(git rev-list --count $ARB..$ALB 2>/dev/null) +0));
      if [ "$NBEHIND" -gt 0 ]; then
        if [ "$NAHEAD" -gt 0 ]; then
          echo " branch $LB is $NBEHIND commit(s) behind and $NAHEAD commit(s) ahead of $REMOTE/$RB. could not be fast-forwarded";
        elif [ "$LB" = "$CLB" ]; then
          echo " branch $LB was $NBEHIND commit(s) behind of $REMOTE/$RB. fast-forward merge";
          git merge -q $ARB;
        else
          echo " branch $LB was $NBEHIND commit(s) behind of $REMOTE/$RB. resetting local branch to remote";
          git branch -f $LB -t $ARB >/dev/null;
        fi
      fi
    done
  done
}

main $@

其他回答

你不能只使用一个git命令,但是你可以用一个bash行自动化它。

为了用一行安全地更新所有分支,我是这样做的:

git fetch --all && for branch in $(git branch | sed '/*/{$q;h;d};$G' | tr -d '*') ; do git checkout $branch && git merge --ff-only || break ; done

如果它不能快进一个分支或遇到错误,它将停止并将您留在该分支中,以便您可以收回控制权并手动合并。 如果所有分支都可以快进,它将以您当前所在的分支结束,使您停留在更新之前的位置。

解释:

为了更好的可读性,可以将它分成几行:

git fetch --all && \
for branch in $(git branch | sed '/*/{$q;h;d};$G' | tr -d '*')
    do git checkout $branch && \
    git merge --ff-only || break
done

git fetch --all && ... => Fetches all refs from all remotes and continue with the next command if there has been no error. git branch | sed '/*/{$q;h;d};$G' | tr -d '*' => From the output of git branch, sed take the line with a * and move it to the end (so that the current branch will be updated last). Then tr simply remove the *. for branch in $(...) ; do git checkout $branch && git merge --ff-only || break ; done = > For each branch name obtained from the previous command, checkout this branch and try to merge with a fast-forward. If it fails, break is called and the command stops here.

当然,如果你想要的话,你可以用git rebase替换git merge——ff-only。

最后,你可以把它作为一个别名放在bashrc中:

alias git-pull-all='git fetch --all && for branch in $(git branch | sed '\''/*/{$q;h;d};$G'\'' | tr -d "*") ; do git checkout $branch && git merge --ff-only || break ; done'

或者如果你害怕混淆' and ',或者你只是喜欢在编辑器中保持语法的可读性,你可以将它声明为一个函数:

git-pull-all()
{
    git fetch --all && for branch in $(git branch | sed '/*/{$q;h;d};$G' | tr -d '*') ; do git checkout $branch && git merge --ff-only || break ; done
}

奖金:

对于那些想要sed '/*/{$q;h;d};$G'部分的解释:

/*/ =>查找带*的行。 {$q =>如果它在最后一行,退出(我们不需要做任何事情,因为当前分支已经是列表中的最后一个)。 d} =>否则,将该行保存在保持缓冲区中,并将其删除在当前列表位置。 $G =>当它到达最后一行时,追加保持缓冲区的内容。

以上答案都没有考虑存在多个工作树的可能性。使用git update-ref或git branch -f更新当前在其他工作树中签出的分支会产生意想不到的副作用。

考虑一下我处理工作树的解决方案:

#! /usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

# Read the default remote from config, defaulting to "origin".
DEFAULT_REMOTE=$(git config --default origin --get clone.defaultRemoteName)

# Use first argument as remote name, fallback to default.
REMOTE=${1:-$DEFAULT_REMOTE}

# Resolve the rev that HEAD points at, so that we can give it
# a special treatment.
HEAD_REV=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

# Format that allows us to easily grep for local branches that are behind,
# and have an upstream at $REMOTE.
FORMAT="%(upstream:trackshort)%(upstream:remotename)|%(refname:short)"

# Get a list of revs that are checked out. We don't want to
# update refs that are pointing at them.
set +e
WORKTREE_REVS=$(git worktree list --porcelain | grep -Po "HEAD \K(.+)" | grep -v "$HEAD_REV")
set -e

git fetch $REMOTE

for BRANCH in $(git for-each-ref refs/heads --format="$FORMAT" | grep -Po "<$REMOTE\|\K(.+)")
do
    BRANCH_REV=$(git rev-parse $BRANCH)
    if [ "$BRANCH_REV" = "$HEAD_REV" ]
    then
        # This branch is currently checked out "here". Forward it carefully.
        set +e
        git merge --no-autostash --ff-only $BRANCH@{u}
        set -e
    elif grep -q "$BRANCH_REV" <<< "$WORKTREE_REVS"
    then
        # This branch is currently checked out by another. Leave it alone.
        echo "$BRANCH skipped, because it is checked out in another worktree. Use 'git worktree list' to diagnose."
    else
        # This branch is not checked out. Just update it!
        git update-ref refs/heads/$BRANCH $BRANCH@{u}
        echo "$BRANCH forwarded"
        fi
done

这里有很多答案,但没有一个是使用git-fetch直接更新本地ref,这比检查分支简单得多,也比git-update-ref更安全。

这里我们使用git-fetch来更新非当前分支,而git pull——ff-only用于当前分支。它:

不需要检查分支机构 仅在可以快进的情况下更新分支 当它不能快进时会报告吗

就是这样:

#!/bin/bash
currentbranchref="$(git symbolic-ref HEAD 2>&-)"
git branch -r | grep -v ' -> ' | while read remotebranch
do
    # Split <remote>/<branch> into remote and branchref parts
    remote="${remotebranch%%/*}"
    branchref="refs/heads/${remotebranch#*/}"

    if [ "$branchref" == "$currentbranchref" ]
    then
        echo "Updating current branch $branchref from $remote..."
        git pull --ff-only
    else
        echo "Updating non-current ref $branchref from $remote..."
        git fetch "$remote" "$branchref:$branchref"
    fi
done

从git-fetch的manpage:

   <refspec>
       The format of a <refspec> parameter is an optional plus +, followed by the source ref <src>,
       followed by a colon :, followed by the destination ref <dst>.

       The remote ref that matches <src> is fetched, and if <dst> is not empty string, the local ref
       that matches it is fast-forwarded using <src>. If the optional plus + is used, the local ref is
       updated even if it does not result in a fast-forward update.

通过指定git fetch <remote> <ref>:<ref>(没有任何+),我们得到一个只在本地ref可以快进时更新它的fetch。

注意,这假设本地分支和远程分支的名称相同(并且您希望跟踪所有分支),它实际上应该使用关于您拥有哪些本地分支以及它们被设置为跟踪的内容的信息。

您为pull描述的行为——都完全符合预期,尽管不一定有用。该选项被传递给git fetch,然后从所有远程获取所有引用,而不仅仅是需要的一个;然后,Pull合并(或者在您的情况下,是重新创建)适当的单个分支。

如果你想查看其他分支机构,你就必须查看它们。是的,合并(和重基)绝对需要一个工作树,所以不检查其他分支就不能完成它们。如果愿意,您可以将所描述的步骤打包到脚本/别名中,不过我建议使用&&来连接命令,这样即使其中一个命令失败,它也不会尝试继续执行。

我使用hub的sync子命令来实现自动化。我在我的.bash_profile中有别名git=hub,所以我键入的命令是:

git sync

这将更新具有匹配上游分支的所有本地分支。从手册页:

如果本地分支已经过时,快进; 如果本地分支包含未推送的工作,请对此发出警告; 如果分支显示为已合并,且上游分支已被删除,则删除该分支。

它还处理在当前分支上存储/解存储未提交的更改。

我曾经使用过一个类似的工具,叫做git-up,但它不再被维护,git sync几乎做了完全相同的事情。