结合这里介绍的一些想法，您可以创建一个没有循环的优雅if语句，它可以精确地进行单词匹配。

find="myword"
array=(value1 value2 myword)
if [[ ! -z $(printf '%s\n' "${array[@]}" | grep -w $find) ]]; then
  echo "Array contains myword";
fi

这将不会触发一个单词或val，只有整个单词匹配。如果每个数组值包含多个单词，则会中断。

虽然这里有几个很好的和有用的答案，但我没有找到一个似乎是性能、跨平台和健壮性的正确组合;所以我想分享一下我为我的代码编写的解决方案:

#!/bin/bash

# array_contains "$needle" "${haystack[@]}"
#
# Returns 0 if an item ($1) is contained in an array ($@).
#
# Developer note:
#    The use of a delimiter here leaves something to be desired. The ideal
#    method seems to be to use `grep` with --line-regexp and --null-data, but
#    Mac/BSD grep doesn't support --line-regexp.
function array_contains()
{
    # Extract and remove the needle from $@.
    local needle="$1"
    shift

    # Separates strings in the array for matching. Must be extremely-unlikely
    # to appear in the input array or the needle.
    local delimiter='#!-\8/-!#'

    # Create a string with containing every (delimited) element in the array,
    # and search it for the needle with grep in fixed-string mode.
    if printf "${delimiter}%s${delimiter}" "$@" | \
        grep --fixed-strings --quiet "${delimiter}${needle}${delimiter}"; then
        return 0
    fi

    return 1
}

别胡闹了!使您的解决方案简单、干净和可重用。

这些函数负责索引数组和关联数组。可以通过将搜索算法从线性搜索升级为二进制搜索(用于大型数据集)来改进它们。

##
# Determines if a value exists in an array.
###
function hasArrayValue ()
{
    local -r needle="{$1:?}"
    local -nr haystack="{$2:?}"  # Where you pass by reference to get the entire array in one argument.

    # Linear search. Upgrade to binary search for large datasets.
    for value in "${haystack[@]}"; do
        if [[ "$value" == "$needle" ]]; then
            return 0
        fi
    done

    return 1
}

##
# Determines if a value exists in an associative array / map.
###
function hasMapValue ()
{
    local -r needle="{$1:?}"
    local -nr haystack="{$2:?}"

    # Linear search. Upgrade to binary search for large datasets.
    for value in "${haystack[@]}"; do
        if [[ $value == $needle ]]; then
            return 0
        fi
    done

    return 1
}

是的，同样的逻辑，但在处理bash时，如果函数的名称可以让您知道迭代的对象(或不迭代的对象)，则可能(可能)有用。

另一个没有函数的代码:

(for e in "${array[@]}"; do [[ "$e" == "searched_item" ]] && exit 0; done) && echo "found" || echo "not found"

谢谢@Qwerty关于空格的提示!

对应的功能:

find_in_array() {
  local word=$1
  shift
  for e in "$@"; do [[ "$e" == "$word" ]] && return 0; done
  return 1
}

例子:

some_words=( these are some words )
find_in_array word "${some_words[@]}" || echo "expected missing! since words != word"

我通常只使用:

inarray=$(echo ${haystack[@]} | grep -o "needle" | wc -w)

非零值表示找到了匹配。

．.． 实际上，为了解决它不能与needle1和needle2工作的问题，如果你只想要一个精确匹配，没有更多，没有更少，只需在-o后面添加一个w标志，用于整个单词匹配:

inarray=$(echo ${haystack[@]} | grep -ow "needle" | wc -w)

@ghostdog74关于使用大小写逻辑检查数组包含特定值的回答的一个小补充:

myarray=(one two three)
word=two
case "${myarray[@]}" in  ("$word "*|*" $word "*|*" $word") echo "found" ;; esac

或者打开extglob选项，你可以这样做:

myarray=(one two three)
word=two
shopt -s extglob
case "${myarray[@]}" in ?(*" ")"$word"?(" "*)) echo "found" ;; esac

我们也可以用if语句:

myarray=(one two three)
word=two
if [[ $(printf "_[%s]_" "${myarray[@]}") =~ .*_\[$word\]_.* ]]; then echo "found"; fi