您还可以尝试这段代码。我们可以尝试任何论点

# Finding the average of given number of arguments
def avg(*args):   # args is the argument name we give
    sum = 0
    for i in args:
        sum += i
        average = sum/len(args)   # Will find length of arguments we given
    print("Avg: ", average)

# call function with different number of arguments
avg(1,2)
avg(5,6,4,7)
avg(11,23,54,111,76)

Python 3.8增加了functools.singledispatchmethod

将方法转换为单分派泛型函数。 要定义一个泛型方法，请使用@singledispatchmethod装饰它 装饰。注意，调度发生在第一个的类型上 非self或非cls参数，相应地创建你的函数:

from functools import singledispatchmethod


class Negator:
    @singledispatchmethod
    def neg(self, arg):
        raise NotImplementedError("Cannot negate a")

    @neg.register
    def _(self, arg: int):
        return -arg

    @neg.register
    def _(self, arg: bool):
        return not arg


negator = Negator()
for v in [42, True, "Overloading"]:
    neg = negator.neg(v)
    print(f"{v=}, {neg=}")

输出

v=42, neg=-42
v=True, neg=False
NotImplementedError: Cannot negate a

@singledispatchmethod支持与其他装饰器嵌套，例如 @classmethod。注意，为了允许dispatcher.register， Singledispatchmethod必须是最外层的装饰器。这是 带有negg方法的否定类:

from functools import singledispatchmethod


class Negator:
    @singledispatchmethod
    @staticmethod
    def neg(arg):
        raise NotImplementedError("Cannot negate a")

    @neg.register
    def _(arg: int) -> int:
        return -arg

    @neg.register
    def _(arg: bool) -> bool:
        return not arg


for v in [42, True, "Overloading"]:
    neg = Negator.neg(v)
    print(f"{v=}, {neg=}")

输出:

v=42, neg=-42
v=True, neg=False
NotImplementedError: Cannot negate a

相同的图案可以用于其他类似的装饰: Staticmethod、abstractmethod等。

对于函数重载，可以使用“自己动手”的解决方案。下面这个摘自Guido van Rossum关于多方法的文章(因为在Python中，多方法和重载之间几乎没有区别):

registry = {}

class MultiMethod(object):
    def __init__(self, name):
        self.name = name
        self.typemap = {}
    def __call__(self, *args):
        types = tuple(arg.__class__ for arg in args) # a generator expression!
        function = self.typemap.get(types)
        if function is None:
            raise TypeError("no match")
        return function(*args)
    def register(self, types, function):
        if types in self.typemap:
            raise TypeError("duplicate registration")
        self.typemap[types] = function


def multimethod(*types):
    def register(function):
        name = function.__name__
        mm = registry.get(name)
        if mm is None:
            mm = registry[name] = MultiMethod(name)
        mm.register(types, function)
        return mm
    return register

它的用法是

from multimethods import multimethod
import unittest

# 'overload' makes more sense in this case
overload = multimethod

class Sprite(object):
    pass

class Point(object):
    pass

class Curve(object):
    pass

@overload(Sprite, Point, Direction, int)
def add_bullet(sprite, start, direction, speed):
    # ...

@overload(Sprite, Point, Point, int, int)
def add_bullet(sprite, start, headto, speed, acceleration):
    # ...

@overload(Sprite, str)
def add_bullet(sprite, script):
    # ...

@overload(Sprite, Curve, speed)
def add_bullet(sprite, curve, speed):
    # ...

目前最严格的限制是:

不支持方法，只支持非类成员的函数; 继承没有被处理; 不支持Kwargs; 注册新函数应该在导入时完成，这是不线程安全的

您还可以尝试这段代码。我们可以尝试任何论点

# Finding the average of given number of arguments
def avg(*args):   # args is the argument name we give
    sum = 0
    for i in args:
        sum += i
        average = sum/len(args)   # Will find length of arguments we given
    print("Avg: ", average)

# call function with different number of arguments
avg(1,2)
avg(5,6,4,7)
avg(11,23,54,111,76)

你要求的是所谓的多重调度。参见Julia语言示例，其中演示了不同类型的分派。

然而，在讨论这个问题之前，我们首先要解决为什么在Python中重载并不是你真正想要的。

为什么不超载?

首先，我们需要理解重载的概念，以及为什么它不适用于Python。

在使用可以区分数据类型的语言时 编译时，可以在 编译时。为…创造这样的替代功能的行为 编译时选择通常称为重载 函数。(维基百科)

Python是一种动态类型语言，因此重载的概念并不适用于它。然而，并不是所有的都失去了，因为我们可以在运行时创建这样的替代函数:

在编程语言中，将数据类型识别推迟到 运行时在备选项中进行选择 函数必须在运行时根据动态确定的值发生 函数参数的类型。其替代函数 以这种方式选择的实现引用最多 通常称为多方法。(维基百科)

因此，我们应该能够在python中使用多方法——或者，也可以称为:多分派。

多分派

多方法也被称为多重调度:

多调度或多方法是一些的特点 面向对象的程序设计语言，其中包含函数或方法 的运行时(动态)类型可以动态分派 不止一个论点。(维基百科)

Python不支持开箱即用1，但是，恰好有一个名为multipledispatch的优秀Python包可以做到这一点。

解决方案

下面是我们如何使用multipledispatch2包来实现你的方法:

>>> from multipledispatch import dispatch
>>> from collections import namedtuple
>>> from types import *  # we can test for lambda type, e.g.:
>>> type(lambda a: 1) == LambdaType
True

>>> Sprite = namedtuple('Sprite', ['name'])
>>> Point = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y'])
>>> Curve = namedtuple('Curve', ['x', 'y', 'z'])
>>> Vector = namedtuple('Vector', ['x','y','z'])

>>> @dispatch(Sprite, Point, Vector, int)
... def add_bullet(sprite, start, direction, speed):
...     print("Called Version 1")
...
>>> @dispatch(Sprite, Point, Point, int, float)
... def add_bullet(sprite, start, headto, speed, acceleration):
...     print("Called version 2")
...
>>> @dispatch(Sprite, LambdaType)
... def add_bullet(sprite, script):
...     print("Called version 3")
...
>>> @dispatch(Sprite, Curve, int)
... def add_bullet(sprite, curve, speed):
...     print("Called version 4")
...

>>> sprite = Sprite('Turtle')
>>> start = Point(1,2)
>>> direction = Vector(1,1,1)
>>> speed = 100 #km/h
>>> acceleration = 5.0 #m/s**2
>>> script = lambda sprite: sprite.x * 2
>>> curve = Curve(3, 1, 4)
>>> headto = Point(100, 100) # somewhere far away

>>> add_bullet(sprite, start, direction, speed)
Called Version 1

>>> add_bullet(sprite, start, headto, speed, acceleration)
Called version 2

>>> add_bullet(sprite, script)
Called version 3

>>> add_bullet(sprite, curve, speed)
Called version 4

1. Python 3目前支持单分派 2. 注意不要在多线程环境中使用multipledispatch，否则会出现奇怪的行为。

我认为Bullet类层次结构和相关联的多态性是正确的方法。通过使用元类，可以有效地重载基类构造函数，这样调用基类就会创建适当的子类对象。下面是一些示例代码，以说明我的意思的本质。

更新

代码已被修改为在Python 2和Python 3下运行，以保持相关性。这样做的方式避免了使用Python的显式元类语法，这在两个版本之间是不同的。

为了实现这一目标，在创建Bullet基类时显式调用元类来创建BulletMeta类的BulletMetaBase实例(而不是使用__metaclass__= class属性或根据Python版本使用元类关键字参数)。

class BulletMeta(type):
    def __new__(cls, classname, bases, classdict):
        """ Create Bullet class or a subclass of it. """
        classobj = type.__new__(cls, classname, bases, classdict)
        if classname != 'BulletMetaBase':
            if classname == 'Bullet':  # Base class definition?
                classobj.registry = {}  # Initialize subclass registry.
            else:
                try:
                    alias = classdict['alias']
                except KeyError:
                    raise TypeError("Bullet subclass %s has no 'alias'" %
                                    classname)
                if alias in Bullet.registry: # unique?
                    raise TypeError("Bullet subclass %s's alias attribute "
                                    "%r already in use" % (classname, alias))
                # Register subclass under the specified alias.
                classobj.registry[alias] = classobj

        return classobj

    def __call__(cls, alias, *args, **kwargs):
        """ Bullet subclasses instance factory.

            Subclasses should only be instantiated by calls to the base
            class with their subclass' alias as the first arg.
        """
        if cls != Bullet:
            raise TypeError("Bullet subclass %r objects should not to "
                            "be explicitly constructed." % cls.__name__)
        elif alias not in cls.registry: # Bullet subclass?
            raise NotImplementedError("Unknown Bullet subclass %r" %
                                      str(alias))
        # Create designated subclass object (call its __init__ method).
        subclass = cls.registry[alias]
        return type.__call__(subclass, *args, **kwargs)


class Bullet(BulletMeta('BulletMetaBase', (object,), {})):
    # Presumably you'd define some abstract methods that all here
    # that would be supported by all subclasses.
    # These definitions could just raise NotImplementedError() or
    # implement the functionality is some sub-optimal generic way.
    # For example:
    def fire(self, *args, **kwargs):
        raise NotImplementedError(self.__class__.__name__ + ".fire() method")

    # Abstract base class's __init__ should never be called.
    # If subclasses need to call super class's __init__() for some
    # reason then it would need to be implemented.
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        raise NotImplementedError("Bullet is an abstract base class")


# Subclass definitions.
class Bullet1(Bullet):
    alias = 'B1'
    def __init__(self, sprite, start, direction, speed):
        print('creating %s object' % self.__class__.__name__)
    def fire(self, trajectory):
        print('Bullet1 object fired with %s trajectory' % trajectory)


class Bullet2(Bullet):
    alias = 'B2'
    def __init__(self, sprite, start, headto, spead, acceleration):
        print('creating %s object' % self.__class__.__name__)


class Bullet3(Bullet):
    alias = 'B3'
    def __init__(self, sprite, script): # script controlled bullets
        print('creating %s object' % self.__class__.__name__)


class Bullet4(Bullet):
    alias = 'B4'
    def __init__(self, sprite, curve, speed): # for bullets with curved paths
        print('creating %s object' % self.__class__.__name__)


class Sprite: pass
class Curve: pass

b1 = Bullet('B1', Sprite(), (10,20,30), 90, 600)
b2 = Bullet('B2', Sprite(), (-30,17,94), (1,-1,-1), 600, 10)
b3 = Bullet('B3', Sprite(), 'bullet42.script')
b4 = Bullet('B4', Sprite(), Curve(), 720)
b1.fire('uniform gravity')
b2.fire('uniform gravity')

输出:

creating Bullet1 object
creating Bullet2 object
creating Bullet3 object
creating Bullet4 object
Bullet1 object fired with uniform gravity trajectory
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "python-function-overloading.py", line 93, in <module>
    b2.fire('uniform gravity') # NotImplementedError: Bullet2.fire() method
  File "python-function-overloading.py", line 49, in fire
    raise NotImplementedError(self.__class__.__name__ + ".fire() method")
NotImplementedError: Bullet2.fire() method