function reverse_string(string)
{
var string;

var len = string.length;

var stringExp = string.split('');
var i;
for (i = len-1; i >=0;i--)
{
var result = document.write(stringExp[i]);
}

return result;
}

reverse_string("This is a reversed string");

//outputs: gnirts描述一个sihT

保持干燥和简单，傻!!

function reverse(s){
let str = s;
var reverse = '';
for (var i=str.length;i>0;i--){

    var newstr = str.substring(0,i)
    reverse += newstr.substr(-1,1)
}
return reverse;
}

在一次面试中，我被要求在不使用任何变量或本机方法的情况下反转一个字符串。这是我最喜欢的实现:

function reverseString(str) {
    return str === '' ? '' : reverseString(str.slice(1)) + str[0];
}

使用Array函数，

String.prototype.reverse = function(){
    return [].reduceRight.call(this, function(last, secLast){return last + secLast});
}

真正的答案是:你不能把它颠倒过来，但是你可以创建一个颠倒过来的新字符串。

Just as an exercise to play with recursion: sometimes when you go to an interview, the interviewer may ask you how to do this using recursion, and I think the "preferred answer" might be "I would rather not do this in recursion as it can easily cause a stack overflow" (because it is O(n) rather than O(log n). If it is O(log n), it is quite difficult to get a stack overflow -- 4 billion items could be handled by a stack level of 32, as 2 ** 32 is 4294967296. But if it is O(n), then it can easily get a stack overflow.

有时候面试官还是会问你，“作为练习，你为什么不用递归来写呢?”就是这样:

String.prototype.reverse = function() {
    if (this.length <= 1) return this;
    else return this.slice(1).reverse() + this.slice(0,1);
}

测试运行:

var s = "";
for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    s += ("apple" + i);
}
console.log(s.reverse());

输出:

999elppa899elppa...2elppa1elppa0elppa

为了尝试获得堆栈溢出，我在谷歌Chrome中将1000更改为10000，它报告:

RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

ES6

 function reverseString(str) {
     return [...str].reverse().join("");
 }

 console.log(reverseString("Hello")); // olleH