String.prototype.reverse_string=function() {return this.split("").reverse().join("");}

or

String.prototype.reverse_string = function() {
    var s = "";
    var i = this.length;
    while (i>0) {
        s += this.substring(i-1,i);
        i--;
    }
    return s;
}

你可以尝试这样做。我相信还有重构的空间。我无法使用分裂函数。也许有人知道不分裂的方法。

代码设置，可以把它放在你的。js库

使用它的代码(有客户端代码，只是因为它在浏览器中测试过):

var sentence = "My Stack is Overflowing."
document.write(sentence.reverseLetters() + '<br />');
document.write(sentence.reverseWords() + '<br />');

代码片段:

String.prototype.aggregate = function(vals, aggregateFunction) { var temp = ''; for (var i = vals.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { temp = aggregateFunction(vals[i], temp); } return temp; } String.prototype.reverseLetters = function() { return this.aggregate(this.split(''), function(current, word) { return word + current; }) } String.prototype.reverseWords = function() { return this.aggregate(this.split(' '), function(current, word) { return word + ' ' + current; }) } var sentence = "My Stack is Overflowing." document.write(sentence.reverseLetters() + '<br />'); document.write(sentence.reverseWords() + '<br />');

字符串本身是不可变的，但是你可以用下面的代码轻松地创建一个反向副本:

function reverseString(str) {

  var strArray = str.split("");
  strArray.reverse();

  var strReverse = strArray.join("");

  return strReverse;
}

reverseString("hello");

好的，很简单，你可以创建一个简单的循环函数来为你反向字符串，而不需要使用reverse()， charAt()等，就像这样:

例如，你有这样一个字符串:

var name = "StackOverflow";

创建一个这样的函数，我称之为reverseString…

function reverseString(str) {
  if(!str.trim() || 'string' !== typeof str) {
    return;
  }
  let l=str.length, s='';
  while(l > 0) {
    l--;
    s+= str[l];
  }
  return s;
}

你可以这样称呼它:

reverseString(name);

结果是:

"wolfrevOkcatS"

保持干燥和简单，傻!!

function reverse(s){
let str = s;
var reverse = '';
for (var i=str.length;i>0;i--){

    var newstr = str.substring(0,i)
    reverse += newstr.substr(-1,1)
}
return reverse;
}

真正的答案是:你不能把它颠倒过来，但是你可以创建一个颠倒过来的新字符串。

Just as an exercise to play with recursion: sometimes when you go to an interview, the interviewer may ask you how to do this using recursion, and I think the "preferred answer" might be "I would rather not do this in recursion as it can easily cause a stack overflow" (because it is O(n) rather than O(log n). If it is O(log n), it is quite difficult to get a stack overflow -- 4 billion items could be handled by a stack level of 32, as 2 ** 32 is 4294967296. But if it is O(n), then it can easily get a stack overflow.

有时候面试官还是会问你，“作为练习，你为什么不用递归来写呢?”就是这样:

String.prototype.reverse = function() {
    if (this.length <= 1) return this;
    else return this.slice(1).reverse() + this.slice(0,1);
}

测试运行:

var s = "";
for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    s += ("apple" + i);
}
console.log(s.reverse());

输出:

999elppa899elppa...2elppa1elppa0elppa

为了尝试获得堆栈溢出，我在谷歌Chrome中将1000更改为10000，它报告:

RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded